从单一性与复杂性、稳定性与跳跃性、孤立性与开放性解析了边疆山区旅游城市交通演化的一般特征,从原生性与多样性、整体性与差异性并存解析了边疆山区旅游城市旅游演化特征。从双向视角总结了边疆山区交通与旅游双向互馈机制。选取典型边疆山区旅游城市——丽江市为实证研究个案,实证表明：①2001—2016年丽江市交通与旅游综合发展水平都呈现逐步上升的发展趋势,二者差异呈现先扩大后减小的态势,表明交通对旅游支撑作用呈现出先减弱后逐渐增强的趋势;②2001—2016年交通与旅游发展水平耦合度均在0.8以上,交通与旅游发展水平存在较强的耦合互动关系;③2001—2016年交通与旅游发展水平协调度逐步提高,协调指数从0.1808增加到0.9878,以2006、2010和2014年为节点前后经历了失调状态、过渡状态、优化提升状态、优质协调状态四个阶段;④2001—2016年交通与旅游发展变化拟合较好,但旅游因子对交通发展的贡献率显著高于交通因子对旅游发展的贡献率,交通与旅游发展构成双向互馈作用关系且表现出显著的旅游产业发展的首位驱动效应。
Defined the concept of the frontier, the frontier mountain area and tourist city of Frontier mountain area, it is pointed out that the characteristic of tourism industry format is the most prominent feature of tourism cities in frontier mountain areas. this paper analyzed the general characteristics of the traffic evolution of tourist cities in the frontier mountain areas from the singularity and complexity, stability and jumping, isolation and openness, and analyzed the general characteristics of tourism evolution of tourist cities in the Frontier mountainous areas from two aspects of the nature and diversity, integrity and differences. It is summarized from the bidirectional angle of Mutual travel mechanism between traffic and tourism in border mountainous areas. Taking Lijiang as a case study and the study showed: 1)The comprehensive development level of traffic and tourism in Lijiang shows a rising trend 2001-2016, The difference between the two showed a trend of decreasing after expansion, that traffic on the tourism supporting role presents the first weakened gradually increased. 2)The coupling degree of traffic and tourism development is more than 0.8 in 2001-2016, There is a strong interaction between traffic and tourism development. 3)2001 to 2016 the level of coordination between traffic and tourism development is gradually increased, Coordination index increased from 0.1808 to 0.9878, It has experienced four stages, which are the maladjustment state, the transition state, the optimized promotion state and the high quality coordinated state; 4)From 2001 to 2016 the fitting degree of traffic and tourism development is better, However, the contribution rate of tourism factors to traffic development is significantly higher than the contribution rate of traffic factors to tourism development, Traffic and tourism development constitutes a two-way interaction relationship and Showed the first driving effect of the development of tourism industry.
[1] 金晓哲,林涛. 边疆的类型划分与研究视角[J]. 地域研究与开发,2008,27(3):7-11.
[2] 王凯. 我国省际边界地区旅游经济发展的空间结构优化方略[J].桂林旅游高等专科学校学报,2004,15(2):13-15.
[3] Prideaux B.The role of the transport system in destination de-velopment[J]. Tourism Management,2000,21(1):53-63.
[4] Kozak M.Repeaters behavior at two distinct destination[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,2001,28(3):784-807.
[5] Can V V.Estimation of travel mode choice for domestic tourists to Neha Trans using the multinomial probity model[J]. Transportation Research Part A,2013,49(1):149-159.
[6] 陈新哲,熊黑钢. 新疆交通与旅游协调发展的定量评价及时序分析[J]. 地域研究与开发,2009,28(6):118-121.
[7] 余菲菲,胡文海,荣慧芳. 中小城市旅游经济与交通耦合协调发展研究[J]. 地理科学,2015,35(9):1 116-1 122.
[8] 张广海,贾海威. 江苏省交通优势度与旅游产业发展水平空间耦合分析[J]. 南京师大学报:自然科学版,2013,36(3):139-144.
[9] 程瑞芳,卢晓宾. 河北省旅游交通与旅游经济相关性分析[J]. 经济论坛,2014(7):16-19,29.
[10] 王峰,刘安乐,明庆忠,等. 云南省交通优势度与旅游产业发展水平空间耦合态势研究[J]. 世界地理研究,2014,23(2):166-175.
[11] 刘安乐,杨承玥,鲁芬,等. 滇中城市群交通网络与旅游业耦合发展研究[J]. 世界地理研究,2017,26(1):65-76
[12] 刘安乐,杨承玥,明庆忠,等. 边疆山地城市群交通网络的时空演化——以滇中城市群为例[J]. 经济地理,2016,36(4):70-77.
[13] 程钰,刘雷,任建兰,等. 济南都市圈交通可达性与经济发展水平测度及空间格局研究[J]. 经济地理,2013,33(3):59-64.
[14] 王兆峰,罗瑶. 旅游驱动下的张家界交通运输响应机制分析[J]. 地理科学,2015,35(11):1 397-1 403.
[15] 王兆峰,石献. 武陵山片区旅游业与交通协同发展研究[J]. 经济地理,2016,36(2):202-208.
[16] 贾欢,顾月月. 论山区概念的法律界定[J]. 长春大学学报,2010,20(4):38-41.
[17] 王峰. 西南边疆山区交通网络与旅游空间结构演化关联机制及效应研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学,2014.
[18] 刘安乐. 滇中城市群交通网络演化与旅游发展水平协调性研究[D]. 昆明:云南师范大学,2015.
