城市地理与新型城镇化

借用规模视角下中国城市收缩时空特征及其空间溢出效应

  • 陈姝兴 ,
  • 丁登龙 ,
  • 吴康
展开
  • 1.西南财经大学 经济学院,中国四川 成都 611130;
    2.西南财经大学 经济与管理研究院,中国四川 成都 611130;
    3.首都经济贸易大学 城市经济与公共管理学院,中国 北京 100070
陈姝兴(1991—),女,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为空间政治经济学、区域经济学。E-mail:chensx@swufe.edu.cn
※吴康(1984—),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为城市经济与空间规划治理、城市大数据分析与模拟。E-mail:wukang@cueb.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2023-03-10

  修回日期: 2023-10-30

  网络出版日期: 2024-09-12

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(42171216); 教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(19YJA790092)

Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Spatial Spillover Effects of Urban Shrinkage in China: Based on the Perspective of Borrowed Size

  • CHEN Shuxing ,
  • DING Denglong ,
  • WU Kang
Expand
  • 1. School of Economics,Southwestern University of Finance and Economics,Chengdu 611130,Sichuan,China;
    2. Research Institute of Economics and Management,Southwestern University of Finance and Economics,Chengdu 611130,Sichuan,China;
    3. School of Urban Economics and Public Administration,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing 100070,China

Received date: 2023-03-10

  Revised date: 2023-10-30

  Online published: 2024-09-12

摘要

近年来中国城市收缩现象日益突出,客观准确识别城市收缩现象并探究其影响因素,对于新型城镇化建设具有重要意义。文章以2011—2018年中国286个地级及以上城市为研究对象,通过构建城市收缩指数测度指标体系,从功能规模借用和绩效规模借用的视角,对城市面板数据采用双固定效应模型、空间杜宾模型和面板门限模型等方法,实证检验了城市收缩的影响因素。研究发现:①中国城市在时间维度和空间维度上都出现增长与收缩并存现象,不同类型收缩城市数量、收缩程度和区域分布都存在显著差异。②功能规模借用和绩效规模借用2种效应在城市群和非城市群中均表现出异质性,并存在“空间溢出效应”现象。功能层面以规模借用形式存在,在全国范围内效应都显著;绩效层面则以集聚阴影形式存在,在非城市群中效应不显著。③借用规模因城市规模不同对城市收缩呈现非线性影响,功能规模借用水平表现为大城市>小城市>中型城市,而在绩效层面中小城市表现为集聚阴影,大城市则表现为绩效规模借用。

本文引用格式

陈姝兴 , 丁登龙 , 吴康 . 借用规模视角下中国城市收缩时空特征及其空间溢出效应[J]. 经济地理, 2024 , 44(3) : 66 -75 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2024.03.007

Abstract

In recent years,the phenomenon of urban shrinkage has become increasingly prominent in China. It is of great significance to objectively and accurately identify the phenomenon of urban shrinkage and explore its influencing factors for the construction of new urbanization. This study meticulously examines this phenomenon by focusing on 286 prefecture-level cities of China from 2011 to 2018. It constructs comprehensive evaluation system of urban shrinkage,empirically tests the impact factors of urban shrinkage using the methods of the two-way fixed effects model,spatial Durbin model,and panel threshold model from the perspective of borrowed size. It's found that: 1) Chinese cities which exhibit a unique duality shrink and grow simultaneously within the same geographical confines. Moreover,shrinking cities are not a homogeneous group,it exhibits significant disparities in terms of their numbers,shrinkage degree,and regional distribution. 2) The borrowed function effect and the borrowed performance effect both show heterogeneity in urban agglomerations and non-urban agglomerations,and there is a phenomenon of "spatial spillover effect". The functional level exists in the form of scale borrowing,and the effect is significant throughout the country. The performance level exists in the form of agglomeration shadow,and the effect is not significant in non-urban agglomerations. 3) Borrowed size has a non-linear effect on urban shrinkage due to different city sizes. The order of functional scale borrowing level from high to low is big-sized cities,small-sized cities,medium-sized cities. Small and medium-sized cities show agglomeration shadow,while big-sized cities show performance scale borrowing at the performance level.

参考文献

[1] 龙瀛,吴康,王江浩. 中国收缩城市及其研究框架[J]. 现代城市研究,2015(9):14-19.
[2] 吴康,孙东琪. 城市收缩的研究进展与展望[J]. 经济地理,2017,37(11):59-67.
[3] 张明斗,曲峻熙. 中国广义城市收缩的空间格局与生成逻辑研究——基于人口总量和经济规模的视角[J]. 经济学家,2020(1):77-85.
[4] Burchfield M,Overman H G,Puga D,et al.Causes of sprawl:A portrait from space[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2006,121(2):587-633.
[5] Pallagst K,Fleschurz R,Trapp F.Greening the shrinking city-policies and planning approaches in the USA with the example of Flint,Michigan[J]. Landscape Research,2017,42(7):716-727.
[6] Wolff M,Wiechmann T.Urban growth and decline:Europe’s shrinking cities in a comparative perspective 1990-2010[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies,2018,25(2):122-139.
[7] Liu Z,Liu S.Urban shrinkage in a developing context:Rethinking China's present and future trends[J]. Sustain Cities Society,2022,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103779.
[8] 张帅,王成新,王敬,等. 中国城市收缩的综合测度及其时空分异特征研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(8):72-82.
[9] 姚常成,宋冬林,范欣. 城市“规模”偏小不利于经济增长吗?——两种借用规模视角下的再审视[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(8):62-71.
[10] 王飞. 城市借用规模研究综述[J]. 现代城市研究,2017(2):120-124.
[11] 李顺成,Sewon L,刘晓晨. 城市区域尺度下多中心空间结构的经济绩效影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2021,31(11):123-133.
[12] 陆军,毛文峰. 城市网络外部性的崛起:区域经济高质量一体化发展的新机制[J]. 经济学家,2020(12):62-70.
[13] Alonso W.Urban zero population growth[J]. Daedalus,1973,109(4):191-206.
[14] 姚常成,宋冬林. 借用规模,网络外部性与城市群集聚经济[J]. 产业经济研究,2019(2):76-87.
[15] 杨继军,刘依凡,陈旭,等. 城市群空间功能分工、规模功能借用与企业出口增加值[J]. 经济科学,2021(5):68-83.
[16] Häußermann H,Siebel W.Die schrumpfende Stadt und die Stadtsoziologie[J]. Soziologische Stadtforschung,1988:78-94.
[17] Martinez-Fernandez C,Weyman T,Fol S,et al.Shrinking cities in Australia,Japan,Europe and the USA:From a global process to local policy responses[J]. Progress in Planning,2016,105:1-48.
[18] 高新雨. 城市收缩问题研究进展[J]. 经济学动态,2021(3):145-158.
[19] 吴康,龙瀛,杨宇. 京津冀与长江三角洲的局部收缩:格局,类型与影响因素识别[J]. 现代城市研究,2015(9):26-35.
[20] Pickett S,Boone C G,Mcgrath B P,et al.Ecological science and transformation to the sustainable city[J]. Cities,2013,32(4):10-20.
[21] Ganning J P,Tighe J R.Moving toward a shared understanding of the US shrinking city[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research,2021,41(2):188-201.
[22] Franz P.Shrinking cities. Shrinking economy? The case of East Germany[J]. German Journal of Urban Studies,2004,43(1):23.
[23] Mills,E.S.Book review of urban sprawl causes,consequences and policy responses[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2003(33):251-252.
[24] Blanco H,Alberti M,Forsyth A,et al.Hot,congested,crowded and diverse:Emerging research agendas in planning[J]. Progress in Planning,2009,71(4):153-205.
[25] Audirac I,Cunningham-Sabot E,Fol S,et al.Declining Suburbs in Europe and Latin America[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2012,36(2):226-244.
[26] 张学良,张明斗,肖航. 成渝城市群城市收缩的空间格局与形成机制研究[J]. 重庆大学学报:社会科学版,2018,24(6):1-14.
[27] 丁任重,许渤胤,张航. 城市群能带动区域经济增长吗?——基于7个国家级城市群的实证分析[J]. 经济地理,2021,41(5):37-45.
[28] Wu K,Yao C C.Exploring the association between shrinking cities and the loss of external investment:An intercity network analysis[J]. Cities,2021,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103351.
[29] Meijers E J,Burger M J,Hoogerbrugge M M.Borrowing size in networks of cities:City size,network connectivity and metropolitan functions in Europe[J]. Papers in Regional Science,2016,95(1):181-198.
[30] 刘修岩,李松林,秦蒙. 城市空间结构与地区经济效率——兼论中国城镇化发展道路的模式选择[J]. 管理世界,2017(1):51-64.
[31] Krugman P.Increasing returns and economic geography[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1991,99(3):483-499.
[32] Hesse M.On borrowed size,flawed urbanisation and emerging enclave spaces:The exceptional urbanism of Luxembourg,Luxembourg[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies,2016,23(4):612-627.
[33] Burger M J,Meijers E J,Hoogerbrugge M M,et al.Borrowed size,agglomeration shadows and cultural amenities in North-West Europe[J]. European Planning Studies,2015,23(6):1090-1109.
[34] Camagni R,Capello R,Caragliu A.The rise of second-rank cities:What role for agglomeration economies?[J]. European Planning Studies,2015,23(6):1069-1089.
[35] Meijers E J,Burger M J.Stretching the concept of ‘borrowed size’[J]. Urban Studies,2017,54(1):269-291.
[36] Camagni R,Capello R,Caragliu A.Static vs. dynamic agglomeration economies:Spatial context and structural evolution behind urban growth[J]. Papers in Regional Science,2016,95(1):133-159.
[37] 刘春阳,杨培峰. 中外收缩城市动因机制及表现特征比较研究[J]. 现代城市研究,2017(3):64-71.
[38] 董昕,张朝辉,周卫华. 为什么收缩城市的流动人口定居意愿更强?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2021,31(3):43-51.
[39] 苏红键,魏后凯,邓明. 城市集聚经济的多维性及其实证检验[J]. 财贸经济,2014(5):115-126.
[40] Sohn C,Licheron J,Meijers E.Border cities:Out of the shadow[J]. Papers in Regional Science,2022,101(2):417-438.
文章导航

/