数字经济赋能旅游业高质量发展,旅游业高质量发展倒逼和驱动数字经济新动能释放。在梳理数字经济和旅游业高质量发展耦合机理基础上,基于2011—2019年中国30个省域的面板数据,采用耦合协调度探究数字经济与旅游业高质量发展的耦合协调时空演化,运用障碍度模型与面板Tobit模型诊断2个系统的障碍因子,探析外部影响因素。研究发现：①2011—2019年,数字经济与旅游业高质量发展的综合评价指数总体上均呈现动态增长态势,且皆由最初“沿海高,中西部低”差异分布转变为“中间高,南北两端低”差异分布。②2011—2019年,数字经济与旅游业高质量发展协调度整体上渐趋优化,但与优质协调差距较大,耦合协调度空间分布格局呈现出“‘东中西+T字形’→‘南北两端+T字形’→‘南北两端+中间地带+T字形’”的演化过程。③大多省域数字经济和旅游业高质量发展子系统的前3位指标层障碍因子相同,中西部地区及中间地带、南北两端准则层障碍度排序为数字化创新>数字化发展>数字化基础,东部地区和“T字形”地带为数字化发展>数字化创新>数字化基础。经济发展水平、产业结构、交通可达性、对外开放度、教育水平正向影响2个系统的协调发展,城镇化进程为负向影响,各影响因素回归系数皆为东部>中部>西部,“T字形”地带>中间地带>南北两端。
The digital economy empowers the tourism high-quality development,the tourism high-quality development forces and drives the release of new dynamics of the digital economy. Based on the panel data of 30 provincial-level regions of China in 2011-2019,this study sorts out the coupling mechanism between digital economy and tourism high-quality development,and explores the coupling coordination evolutionary of digital economy and tourism high-quality development by the means of the coupling coordination degree. It uses the methods of the obstacle degree model and panel Tobit model to diagnose the obstacle factors and analyze the external influencing factors of the two systems,respectively. It's found that: 1) From 2011 to 2019,the comprehensive evaluation indexes of digital economy and tourism high-quality development both show dynamic growth in general,and both change from the "higher in coastal region and lower in central and western regions" distribution to "higher in the middle region and lower in the north and south of China" distribution. 2) From 2011 to 2019,the overall coordination degree between tourism high-quality development and digital economy tends to be optimized,but it has the gap to reach the high-quality coordination,and the spatial distribution pattern of coupling coordination degree shows dynamic evolution which is from the "higher in eastern region,lower in western region and T-shaped" distribution characteristics,"lower in the north and south of China and T-shaped " distribution characteristics to "lower in the north and south of China,higher in the middle region and T-shaped" distribution characteristics. 3) Most provincial-level regions have the same obstacle factors in the top three indicator layers of two subsystems,the rank of obstacle degrees from high value to low value is digital innovation,digital development and digital foundation respectively in the central and western regions,the middle zone and the north and south of China. In the eastern region and the "T-shaped" zone,the rank of obstacle degrees from high value to low value is digital development,digital innovation and digital foundation. 4) The level of economic development,industrial structure,traffic accessibility,openness to the outside world,and education level positively influence the coordinated development of the two systems,while the urbanization process negatively influences the development of the two systems,the rank of the regression coefficients of all influencing factors from high value to low value is the eastern region,the central region,the western region,the T-shaped zone,the middle zone,the north and south of China.
[1] 王兆峰,谢佳亮,吴卫. 环长株潭城市群旅游业高质量发展水平变化及其影响因素[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(3):172-181,221.
[2] 刘英基,韩元军. 要素结构变动、制度环境与旅游经济高质量发展[J]. 旅游学刊,2020,35(3):28-38.
[3] 杨路明. 旅游电子商务理论及应用[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社,2015.
[4] 张旺,白永秀. 数字经济与乡村振兴耦合的理论构建、实证分析及优化路径[J]. 中国软科学,2022(1):132-146.
[5] 许宪春,张美慧. 中国数字经济规模测算研究——基于国际比较的视角[J]. 中国工业经济,2020(5):23-41.
[6] Li Y,Hu C,Huang C,et al.The concept of smart tourism in the context of tourism information services[J]. Tourism Management,2017,58:293-300.
[7] Yin P,Zheng X,Duan L,et al.A study of the contribution of information technology on the growth of tourism economy using cross-sectional data[J]. Journal of Global Information Management,2019,27(2):39-58.
[8] 王龙杰,曾国军,毕斗斗. 信息化对旅游产业发展的空间溢出效应[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(2):366-378.
[9] 王冠孝,梁留科,李锋,等. 区域旅游业与信息化的耦合协调关系实证研究[J]. 自然资源学报,2016,31(8):1339-1350.
[10] 杨勇. 互联网促进旅游产业动态优化了吗?[J]. 经济管理,2019,41(5):156-170.
[11] Li X,Law R,Xie G,et al.Review of tourism forecasting research with internet data[J]. Tourism Management,2021,83(3):104245.
[12] 杨彦锋. 互联网技术成为旅游产业融合与新业态的主要驱动因素[J]. 旅游学刊,2012,27(9):7-8.
[13] 毛剑梅,锁箭. 互联网背景下旅游产业的演化与发展:技术驱动视角[J]. 当代经济管理,2017,39(10):49-55.
[14] Navío-Marco J,Ruiz-Gómez L M,Sevilla-Sevilla C. Progress in information technology and tourism management:30 years on and 20 years after the internet-Revisiting Buhalis & Law's landmark study about eTourism[J]. Tourism Management,2018,69:460-470.
[15] 戴克清,苏振,黄润. “互联网+”驱动中国旅游产业创新的效率研究[J]. 华东经济管理,2019,33(7):87-93.
[16] 周琳,刘懿锋. 旅游产业与互联网融合发展研究[J]. 理论探讨,2019(6):114-117.
[17] 赵磊. 数字经济赋能旅游业高质量发展的内涵与维度[J]. 旅游学刊,2022,37(4):5-6.
[18] 陈琳琳,徐金海,李勇坚. 数字技术赋能旅游业高质量发展的理论机理与路径探索[J]. 改革,2022(2):101-110.
[19] 陈晓红. 数字经济时代的技术融合与应用创新趋势分析[J]. 中南大学学报:社会科学版,2018,24(5):1-8.
[20] 周锦,王廷信. 数字经济下城市文化旅游融合发展模式和路径研究[J]. 江苏社会科学,2021(5):70-77.
[21] 黄勃,李海彤,刘俊岐,等. 数字技术创新与中国企业高质量发展——来自企业数字专利的证据[J]. 经济研究,2023,58(3):97-115.
[22] 乔向杰. 智慧旅游赋能旅游业高质量发展[J]. 旅游学刊,2022,37(2):10-12.
[23] Tang R.Digital economy drives tourism development—Empirical evidence based on the UK[J]. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja,2023,36(1):2003-2020.
[24] 马斌斌,豆媛媛,贺舒琪,等. 中国数字经济与旅游产业融合发展的时空特征及驱动机制[J]. 经济地理,2023,43(6):192-201.
[25] 唐睿. 长三角数字经济和旅游业高质量发展的空间特征分析[J]. 经济体制改革,2022(5):51-59.
[26] 荆文君,孙宝文. 数字经济促进经济高质量发展:一个理论分析框架[J]. 经济学家,2019(2):66-73.
[27] 魏翔. 数字旅游——中国旅游经济发展新模式[J]. 旅游学刊,2022,37(4):10-11.
[28] 杨宏浩. 数字技术赋能旅游业高质量发展[J]. 中国旅游评论,2020(3):59-64.
[29] 石培华,吴普. 中国旅游业能源消耗与CO2排放量的初步估算[J]. 地理学报,2011,66(2):235-243.
[30] 余志康,孙根年,罗正文,等. 40°N以北城市夏季气候舒适度及消夏旅游潜力分析[J]. 自然资源学报,2015,30(2):327-339.
[31] 任保平,杜宇翔. 黄河流域经济增长—产业发展—生态环境的耦合协同关系[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2021,31(2):119-129.
[32] 舒小林,高应蓓,张元霞,等. 旅游产业与生态文明城市耦合关系及协调发展研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(3):82-90.
[33] 陆利军,李浪,李成家,等. 省域国家森林公园网络关注度与旅游吸引力动态耦合协调关系[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(3):150-159.
[34] 丁学谦,吴群,刘向南,等. 土地利用、经济高质量发展与碳排放耦合协调度及影响因素——来自中国282个地级市的经验研究[J]. 资源科学,2022,44(11):2233-2246.
[35] 郭向阳,穆学青,明庆忠,等. 长江经济带快速交通系统对城市旅游生产率的影响效应分析[J]. 经济地理,2021,41(12):213-222.
[36] 刘军,杨渊鋆,张三峰. 中国数字经济测度与驱动因素研究[J]. 上海经济研究,2020(6):81-96.
