三农、土地与生态

民族旅游乡村农户生计恢复力评价及障碍因子分析——以湘鄂武陵山片区10个村为例

展开
  • 1.吉首大学 土木工程与建筑学院,中国湖南 张家界 427000;
    2.武陵山区乡村规划与发展研究中心,中国湖南 张家界 427000;
    3.吉首大学 旅游学院,中国湖南 张家界 427000
吴吉林(1978—),男,博士,教授,研究方向为乡村旅游与乡村发展。E-mail:wjlin9911@163.com
※谢文海(1985—),女,博士,讲师,研究方向为土地利用与乡村旅游。E-mail:xiewhai@jsu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2023-03-20

  修回日期: 2023-07-27

  网络出版日期: 2024-06-03

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(42061036); 湖南省自然科学基金项目(2023JJ30491); 湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(22YBX007、22YBA152)

Evaluation and Obstacle Factors of Farmer Households’ Livelihood Resilience in Ethnic Tourism Villages:A Case Study of 10 Villages in Wuling Mountain Area of Hunan and Hubei

Expand
  • 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Jishou University,Zhangjiajie 427000,Hunan,China;
    2. Rural Planning and Development Research Center of Wuling Mountain Area,Zhangjiajie 427000,Hunan,China;
    3. Tourism College,Jishou University,Zhangjiajie 427000,Hunan,China

Received date: 2023-03-20

  Revised date: 2023-07-27

  Online published: 2024-06-03

摘要

生计恢复力能够评估农户应对乡村旅游等外部冲击时的适应能力,是当前乡村社会—生态系统恢复力研究的热点之一。文章基于缓冲能力、适应能力和转型能力3个维度构建了民族旅游乡村农户生计恢复力评价指标体系,以湘鄂武陵山片区10个民族旅游乡村480户农户为研究对象,划分其生计恢复力类型,定量评价生计恢复力指数,并分析生计恢复力障碍因子。结果表明:①农户生计恢复力可分为文化传承型、生计多样型、政策扶持型和传统生计型4种类型。②4种类型农户的生计恢复力指数分别为0.4562、0.3865、0.2022和0.1964,文化传承型农户的缓冲能力、适应能力和转型能力均最高,生计多样型次之,政策扶持型的转型能力最低,传统生计型农户的缓冲能力和适应能力均最低。③家庭成员参与旅游人数、获得专业技能培训机会、家庭核心成员受教育程度、家庭能够获得救助补贴种类等4项指标是不同类型农户生计恢复力的最主要障碍因子。

本文引用格式

吴吉林, 肖玉春, 刘水良, 左金友, 尹宁玲, 谢文海 . 民族旅游乡村农户生计恢复力评价及障碍因子分析——以湘鄂武陵山片区10个村为例[J]. 经济地理, 2024 , 44(1) : 174 -184 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2024.01.018

Abstract

Livelihood resilience,which can assess the adaptive capacity of farmer households in coping with external shocks such as rural tourism,is one of the current hotspots in the research of rural social-ecological system resilience. This paper constructs an evaluation index system of farmer households' livelihood resilience based on the three dimensions of buffering capacity,adaptive capacity and transformation capacity. It takes 480 farmer households of 10 ethnic tourism villages in Wuling Mountain area of Hunan and Hubei as the research objects,classifies their livelihood resilience types,quantitatively evaluates the livelihood resilience index,and analyzes the livelihood resilience obstacle factors. The results show that: 1) The livelihood resilience of farmer households can be divided into four types: cultural inheritance type,diversified livelihood type,policy support type and traditional livelihood type. 2) The livelihood resilience indices of the four types of farmer households are 0.4562,0.3865,0.2022 and 0.1964 respectively,the cultural inheritance type has the highest values in three dimensions,followed by the diversified livelihood type,the policy support type has the lowest value in terms of transformation capacity, and the traditional livelihood type has the lowest values in terms of buffering capacity and adaptive capacity. 3) Four indicators,including the number of family members participating in tourism,access to professional skills training,the education level of core family members,and the types of assistance subsidies available to the family,are the main obstacle factors of livelihood resilience for different types of farmer households.

参考文献

[1] 刘智. 旅游产业与农村可持续生计耦合的空间格局及驱动机制——以张家界为例[J]. 经济地理,2020,40(2):209-216.
[2] 任瀚,张怡. 新冠疫情冲击下旅游相关研究的进展与展望[J]. 资源开发与市场,2022,38(2):231-238.
[3] 卜诗洁,马金海,卓玛措,等. 生计恢复力研究进展与启示[J]. 地理与地理信息科学,2021,37(1):74-79.
[4] Worku A,Pretzsch J,Kassa H,et al.The significance of dry forest income for livelihood resilience:The case of the pastoralists and agro-pastoralists in the drylands of southeastern Ethiopia[J]. Forest Policy & Economics,2014,41:51-59.
[5] Thulstrup A W.Livelihood resilience and adaptive capacity:Tracing changes in household access to capital in Central Vietnam[J]. World Development,2015,74:352-362.
[6] Poelma T,Bayrak M M,Nha D V,et al.Climate change and livelihood resilience capacities in the Mekong Delta:A case study on the transition to rice-shrimp farming in Vietnam's Kien Giang Province[J]. Climatic Change,2021,164(9):1-20.
[7] Liu W,Li J,Ren L,et al.Exploring livelihood resilience and its impact on livelihood strategy in rural China[J]. Social Indicators Research,2020,150(3):977-998.
[8] Holling C S.Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1973,4(1):1-23.
[9] Speranza C I,Wiesmann U,Rist S.An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social-ecological dynamics[J]. Global Environmental Change,2014,28:109-119.
[10] Ayeb-Karlsson S,Geest K,Ahmed I,et al.A people‐centred perspective on climate change,environmental stress,and livelihood resilience in Bangladesh[J]. Sustainability Science,2016,11(4):679-694.
[11] Sina D,Chang-Richards A Y,Wilkinson S,et al. A conceptual framework for measuring livelihood resilience:Relocation experience from Aceh,Indonesia[J]. World Development,2019,117:253-265.
[12] 卜诗洁,卓玛措. 可持续生计方法与生计恢复力分析方法的比较[J]. 地球科学进展,2021,36(11):1127-1136.
[13] Tan S,Tan Z.Grassland tenure,livelihood assets and pastoralists’ resilience:Evidence and empirical analyses from western China[J]. Economic and Political Studies,2017,5(4):381-403.
[14] Zhao X,Chen H,Zhao H,et al.Farmer households’ livelihood resilience in ecological-function areas:Case of the Yellow River water source area of China[J]. Environment,Development and Sustainability,2022,24(7):9665-9686.
[15] Wilmsen B,Webber M.What can we learn from the practice of development-forced displacement and resettlement for organised resettlements in response to climate change?[J]. Geoforum,2015,58:76-85.
[16] Liu W,Xu J,Li J.The influence of poverty alleviation resettlement on rural household livelihood vulnerability in the western mountainous areas,China[J]. Sustainability,2018,10(8):2793.
[17] Quandt A.Measuring livelihood resilience:The household livelihood resilience approach (HLRA)[J]. World Development,2018,107:253-263.
[18] Alam G M M,Alam K,Mushtaq S,et al. How do climate change and associated hazards impact on the resilience of riparian rural communities in Bangladesh?Policy implications for livelihood development[J]. Environmental Science & Policy,2018,84:7-18.
[19] 郑殿元,黄晓军,王晨. 陕北黄土高原农户生计恢复力评价及优化策略研究——以延川县为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(9):9-16.
[20] 何艳冰,张娟,乔旭宁,等. 精准扶贫背景下贫困山区农户生计恢复力研究——以河南秦巴山片区为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(9):53-59.
[21] 苏飞,罗佳琪,朱晓倩,等. 湖北省乡村生计弹性测度及其影响因素分析[J]. 地球科学进展,2021,36(11):1117-1126.
[22] Forster J,Lake I R. Watkinson A R,et al.Marine dependent livelihoods and resilience to environmental change:A case study of Anguilla[J]. Marine Policy,2014,45:204-212.
[23] Marschke M J,Berkes F.Exploring strategies that build livelihood resilience:A case from Cambodia[J]. Ecology and Society,2006,11(1):709-723.
[24] Cooper S J,Wheeler T.Adaptive governance:Livelihood innovation for climate resilience in Uganda[J]. Geoforum,2015,65:96-107.
[25] Uy N,Takeuchi Y,Shaw R.Local adaptation for livelihood resilience in Albay,Philippines[J]. Environmental Hazards Human & Policy Dimensions,2011,10:139-153.
[26] 叶茂,王兆峰. 武陵山区交通通达性与旅游经济联系的耦合协调分析[J]. 经济地理,2017,37(11):213-219.
[27] 陈佳,郑文武,伍瑶,等. 武陵山贫困片区农户贫困特征研究——以湘西少数民族聚居区为例[J]. 衡阳师范学院学报,2013,34(3):172-176.
[28] 丁建军,金宁波,贾武,等. 武陵山片区城镇化的农户生计响应及影响因素研究——基于3个典型乡镇355户农户调查数据的分析[J]. 地理研究,2019,38(8):2027-2043.
[29] Zhang Q,Liu S,Liu J,et al.Sustainable livelihood of households in tourism destination:Evidence from in the Wulingyuan world heritage site[J]. Randwick International of Social Science Journal,2022,3(2):244-255.
[30] Li W,Shuai C,Shuai Y,et al.How livelihood assets contribute to sustainable development of smallholder farmers[J]. Journal of International Development,2020,32(3):408-429.
[31] 温腾飞,石育中,杨新军,等. 黄土高原半干旱区农户生计恢复力及其影响因素研究——以榆中县为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(5):172-182.
[32] 吴孔森,杨晴青,叶文丽,等. 黄土高原农户生计恢复力及其生计建设路径——以陕北佳县为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(4):24-30.
[33] 唐业喜,汤昪,伍招妃,等. 武陵山片区旅游经济时空差异与影响因素研究[J]. 资源开发与市场,2021,37(2):240-245,256.
[34] 刘伟,黎洁,徐洁. 连片特困地区易地扶贫移民生计恢复力评估[J]. 干旱区地理,2019,42(3):673-680.
[35] 纪金雄,洪小燕,朱永杰. 茶农生计恢复力测度及影响因素研究——以安溪县为例[J]. 茶叶科学,2021,41(1):132-142.
[36] 李博,韩增林. 沿海城市人地关系地域系统脆弱性研究——以大连市为例[J]. 经济地理,2010,30(10):1722-1728.
[37] 何艳冰,黄晓军,杨新军. 快速城市化背景下城市边缘区失地农民适应性研究——以西安市为例[J]. 地理研究,2017,36(2):226-240.
[38] 吴吉林,刘帅,刘水良,等. 张家界农户乡村旅游脆弱性评价与影响因素[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(8):1336-1344.
文章导航

/