作为判断上市公司（总部）地理位置的“办公地址”与“注册地址”并非总是重合,可能会造成许多研究的数据和结论出错。文章基于多学科的文献阐述企业位置分歧及对实证研究的影响,验证办公地址与注册地址表征A股上市公司（总部）位置的能力,并延伸讨论不同情况下企业位置的标准及对区位理论的影响。结果表明：①办公地址与注册地址的分离必然导致部分文献所界定的上市公司（总部）位置及其所属地区与现实不符,并造成企业指标、地区指标统计和企业距离等误差,使得研究结论可信度存疑。②在117家办公地址与注册地址跨省份分离的A股上市公司中,高达85.48%的公司总部与办公地址一致,因此上市公司相关研究应以办公地址作为公司（总部）位置,而采用注册地址的已有文献要重新审视。③在企业经营场所与注册地址分离现象的背景下,经济地理学中的企业位置应是承担经济职能并占据一定地理空间的经营场所,注册地址只宜在少数非经济类的研究和数据统计中适用。加强对企业注册地址及其与经营场所分离现象的关注,将在区位主体、区位现象、区位因子、区位影响等方面有益于区位理论的发展创新。
The "office address" and "registration address" of the listed company,which are the only two standards for judging the geographical location of the headquarters,are not spatially identical. This phenomenon may lead to inconsistencies between the location or regional attribution of listed companies (headquarters) defined in numerous literature and the reality,thereby questioning the credibility of research data and conclusions. Based on multidisciplinary literature,this article expounds the divergence of enterprise location and its impact on empirical research,verifies the ability of office address and registration address to represent the location of A-share listed companies (headquarters),and discusses the criteria of enterprise location under different circumstances and its impact on location theory. The results show that: 1) The separation of the office address and the registration address will inevitably lead to the discrepancy between the location and the region of the listed company (headquarters) defined in some literatures and the reality,and cause errors in enterprise indicators,regional indicator statistics and enterprise distance,which makes the credibility of the research conclusion doubtful. 2) Among the 117 A-share listed companies with cross-province separation of office address and registration address,up to 85.48% of the company headquarters and office address are the same,the office address is much better than the registration address in representing the location of the company (headquarters),so the relevant research of listed companies should take the office address as the location of the company (headquarters),and the existing literature using registration address should be re-examined. 3) In fact,the separation between business premises and registration address is quite common. The location of the company (headquarters) in economic geography is be a business premises that undertakes economic functions and occupies a certain geographical space,and the registration address should only be applied in a few non-economic research and data statistics. It should pay more attention to the separation of registration address and business premises,which will be beneficial to the development and innovation of location theory in the aspects of location subject,location phenomenon, location factor and location influence.
[1] 关皓明,杨青山,浩飞龙,等. 基于“产业—企业—空间”的沈阳市经济韧性特征[J]. 地理学报,2021,76(2):415-427.
[2] Bodenmann B R,Axhausen K W.Destination choice for relocating firms:A discrete choice model for the St. Gallen region,Switzerland[J]. Papers in Regional Science,2012,91(2):319-341.
[3] 刘磊. 我国A股市场地域联动性的实证研究[D]. 大连:东北财经大学,2015.
[4] Dziemianowicz W,Ukomska J,Ambroziak A A.Location factors in foreign direct investment at the local level the case of Poland[J]. Regional Studies,2019,53(8):1183-1192.
[5] 蔡宏标,饶品贵. 机构投资者、税收征管与企业避税[J]. 会计研究,2015(10):59-65,97.
[6] 孙玉涛,刘凤朝. 中国企业技术创新主体地位确立——情境、内涵和政策[J]. 科学学研究,2016,34(11):1716-1724.
[7] 曹洁. 金融集团内的信息流动与基金投资业绩[D]. 马鞍山:安徽工业大学,2012.
[8] 尹齐炜. 高铁开通与公司业绩:来自中国上市公司的经验证据[D]. 武汉:中南财经政法大学,2019.
[9] Zhao J L,Zhang X B,Song J P.The changing geography of domestic financial city network in China,1995-2015[J]. Growth and Change,2017,49(3):490-511.
[10] 谭劲松,陈艳艳,谭燕. 地方上市公司数量、经济影响力与企业长期借款——来自我国A股市场的经验数据[J]. 中国会计评论,2010,8(1):31-52.
[11] Marian O.Home-country effects of corporate inversions[J]. Washington Law Review,2015,90(1):101-173.
[12] 邢丽,郝晓婧. 全球最低企业税:意图、影响及政策选择[J]. 地方财政研究,2021(12):103-112.
[13] 张可云,裴相烨. 大城市制造业企业空间扩张模式及其对企业效率的影响——以北京市上市企业为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2021,40(10):1613-1625.
[14] 蒋子龙,王军,樊杰. 1990—2019年中国上市公司总部分布变迁及影响因素[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(4):112-121.
[15] 胡国建,陆玉麒,胡舒云. 顾及企业注册地址的区位理论研究[J]. 地理研究,2022,41(2):580-595.
[16] 毕茜,顾立盟,张济建. 传统文化、环境制度与企业环境信息披露[J]. 会计研究,2015(3):12-19,94.
[17] Clausing K A.Should tax policy target multinational firm headquarters?[J]. National Tax Journal,2010,63(4):741-763.
[18] Salehizadeh M.Emerging economies' multinationals:Current status and future prospects[J]. Third World Quarterly,2007,28(6):1151-1166.
[19] 李玲. 高铁站区发展的影响因素研究——以京沪高铁站区为例[D]. 北京:北京交通大学,2019.
[20] 吴波,郝云宏,魏立春. 中国上市公司总部迁移的动向与动因研究[J]. 经济地理,2012,32(12):8-14.
[21] Laamanen T,Simula T,Torstila S.Cross-border relocations of headquarters in Europe[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2012,43(2):187-210.
[22] Zhang X,Li Y J,Yuan Y B.Behind the scenes:The evolving urban networks of film production in China[J]. Urban Geography,2018,39(10):1510-1527.
[23] 白京羽,林晓锋,丁俊琦. 我国生物产业发展现状及政策建议[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2020,35(8):1053-1060.
[24] 蔡庆丰,陈熠辉,林焜. 信贷资源可得性与企业创新:激励还是抑制?——基于银行网点数据和金融地理结构的微观证据[J]. 经济研究,2020,55(10):124-140.
[25] 沈甜甜,汪洋. 上市公司地理位置、风险投资参与与股票流动性——基于创业板市场的实证研究[J]. 金融理论与实践,2020(8):85-95.
[26] Meyer K E,Benito G R G. Where do MNEs locate their headquarters? At home！[J]. Global Strategy Journal,2016,6(2):149-159.
[27] 胡国建,金星星,陆玉麒,等. 中国上市公司总部与注册地跨城市分离的格局、形成过程和影响因素[J]. 地理研究,2021,40(2):402-418.
[28] 朱超. 自贸区背景下宁波FT贸易公司发展战略研究[D]. 杭州:浙江理工大学,2017.
[29] 郭富青. 我国企业住所与经营场所分离与分制改革的法律探析[J]. 现代法学,2020,42(2):145-156.
[30] 汪雨卉. 多源大数据视角下上海市初创企业集聚演化特征研究[D]. 上海:上海师范大学,2019.
[31] 李孝猛. 公司住所登记审查的法律限度[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛),2013,28(2):107-116.
[32] 李小建,李国平,曾刚,等. 经济地理学(第三版)[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2018.
[33] Clevenger N,Crumpacker M,Siehndel R.Corporate inversion:A symbol of a changing paradigm of corporate behavior?Balancing global competitiveness,fiduciary duty,and ethical behavior[J]. International Business & Economics Research Journal,2004,3(2):57-64.
[34] Desai M A,Foley C,Hines J R.Do tax havens divert economic activity?[J]. Economics Letters,2006,90(2):219-224.
[35] Thompson B.Solving the corporate inversion phenomenon:An exercise in free market patriotism,protectionism through facilitation[J]. The Business,Entrepreneurship & Tax Law Review,2017,1(2):556-581.
[36] Yang J G S. Tax planning strategies for corporate inversion[J]. International Journal of Accounting and Finance,2018,8(2):103-121.
[37] 郭婧婷,陶书宁. 霍尔果斯“转折”[J]. 商讯,2018(12):5-8.
[38] Cortes F,Gomes A,Gopalan R.Corporate inversions and governance[J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation,2021,47:100880.
[39] 李广隆. 科学防控公司登记注册地址风险探究[J]. 中国市场监管研究,2018(2):72-74.
