EN中文

经济地理 >

2024 , Vol. 44 >Issue 1: 32 - 44

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2024.01.004

区域经济与理论方法

能源富集区社会—生态系统韧性演化与机理——以榆林市为例

展开
  • 1.陕西师范大学 地理科学与旅游学院,中国陕西 西安 710119;
    2.重庆市地理信息和遥感应用中心,中国 重庆 401120
宋永永（1990—）,男,博士后,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为城市与区域发展、社会—生态系统韧性评估与治理。E-mail：syy2016@snnu.edu.cn
※马蓓蓓（1983—）,女,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为城市与区域发展。E-mail：mabb@snnu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2023-04-04

  修回日期: 2023-06-07

  网络出版日期: 2024-06-03

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年项目（42001251）; 中国博士后科学基金面上项目（2021M692003）; 中央高校基本科研业务费项目（GK202201008）

收起

Evolution and Mechanism of Socio-ecological system Resilience in Energy-rich Areas：A Case Study of Yulin City

Expand
  • 1. School of Geography and Tourism,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi'an 710119,Shaanxi,China;
    2. Chongqing Geomatics and Remote Sensing Center,Chongqing 401120,China

Received date: 2023-04-04

  Revised date: 2023-06-07

  Online published: 2024-06-03

Fold

摘要

文章在构建能源富集区社会—生态系统韧性研究理论框架基础上,以陕北能源富集区榆林市为例,采用集对分析、相关分析等方法,从生态、经济和社会3个子系统和脆弱性与应对能力2个方面入手,评估1998—2020年区域社会—生态系统韧性,揭示其韧性演化规律与机理。结果表明：①1998—2020年榆林市社会—生态系统脆弱性指数由0.427波动上升至0.494,应对能力指数由0.248上升至0.798,韧性指数由0.326上升至0.664,区域社会—生态系统韧性是脆弱性与应对能力相互作用的结果。②社会生活子系统脆弱性对总系统脆弱性的作用呈现上升趋势,各子系统应对能力对总系统应对能力的贡献均呈上升趋势。总应对能力对系统韧性起决定性作用,其中经济生产子系统和社会生活子系统应对能力的影响突出。③各影响因子对榆林市社会—生态系统韧性演化的作用性质、速率和规律存在显著差异,呈现近线性、非线性2种影响方式和近线性递增或递减、U型或倒U型递增或递减6种曲线类型。④在自然生态约束、社会经济转型驱动和能源市场变革等内外部因素作用下,区域社会—生态系统呈现由农牧型向能源型进而迈向绿色型的转型发展态势。

关键词： 社会—生态系统; 韧性; 绿色转型; 自然生态系统; 经济生产系统; 社会生活系统; 能源富集区

本文引用格式

宋永永, 庞先峰, 唐宇, 马蓓蓓, 马艳艳, 薛东前 . 能源富集区社会—生态系统韧性演化与机理——以榆林市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2024 , 44(1) : 32 -44 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2024.01.004

Abstract

Based on the construction of a theoretical framework of the socio-ecological system resilience in energy-rich areas,this paper takes Yulin City,an energy-rich area in northern Shaanxi,as the research area,and uses the methods of the set pair analysis and the correlation analysis to measure the regional socio-ecological system resilience from two levels of vulnerability and response capacity and three subsystems of ecology,economy and society in 1998-2020,it reveals the evolution law and impact mechanism of regional socio-ecological system resilience. The results show that: 1) From 1998 to 2020,the vulnerability index of the socio-ecological system in Yulin City fluctuated from 0.427 to 0.494,the response capacity index increased from 0.248 to 0.798,and the resilience index increased from 0.326 to 0.664. The regional socio-ecological system resilience is the result of the interaction between vulnerability and response capacity. 2) The contribution of social life subsystem vulnerability to the overall system vulnerability is on the rise,and the contribution of each subsystem's response capacity to the overall system's response capacity is on the rise. Total response capacity plays a decisive role in socio-ecological system resilience,with the impact of economic production and social life subsystem's response capacity being prominent. 3) There are significant differences in the nature,rate,and law of the impact of various impact factors on the evolution of the socio-ecological system resilience in Yulin City,presenting two types of impact: near linear and nonlinear,and six types of curve: near linear increasing or decreasing,U-shaped or inverted U-shaped increasing or decreasing. 4) Under the coupling effect of multiple internal and external factors such as natural ecological constraints,socio-ecological transformation drive,and energy market reform,Yulin's socio-ecological system presents a transformation and development trend from agricultural and pastoral type to energy type,and then to green type.

Key words： socio-ecological system; resilience; green transformation; natural ecosystem; economic production system; social life system; energy-rich areas

参考文献

[1] Brondizio E S,Vogt N D,Mansur A V,et al.A conceptual framework for analyzing deltas as coupled social-ecological systems:An example from the Amazon River Delta[J]. Sustainability Science,2016,11(4):591-609.
[2] 苏飞,莫潇杭,童磊,等. 旅游地社会—生态系统适应性研究进展[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(2):280-288.
[3] 宋爽,王帅,傅伯杰,等. 社会—生态系统适应性治理研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(11):2401-2410.
[4] Song Yongyong,Xia Siyou,Xue Dongqian,et al.Spatio-temporal differences and influencing factors of carbon emission equity in the Loess Plateau based on major function-oriented zones[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2023,33(6):1245-1270.
[5] 唐宇,宋永永,薛东前,等. 晋陕蒙地区市域新旧动能转换过程与分异机制[J]. 地理科学进展,2023,42(2):287-300.
[6] 李连刚,张平宇,谭俊涛,等. 韧性概念演变与区域经济韧性研究进展[J]. 人文地理,2019,34(2):1-7,151.
[7] 周晓芳. 社会—生态系统恢复力的测量方法综述[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(12):4278-4288.
[8] 李振民,石磊,张冲昊. 社会—生态视角下县域乡村地域系统脆弱性评价与差异化应对策略[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(5):175-184.
[9] Bruneau M,Chang S E,Eguchi R.T,et al. A Framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J]. Earthquake Spectra,2003,19(4):733-752.
[10] 李艳,陈雯,孙阳. 关联演化视角下地理学区域韧性分析的新思考[J]. 地理研究,2019,38(7):1694-1704.
[11] Fikret Berkes.Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability:Lessons from resilience thinking[J]. Natural Hazards,2007,41(2):283-295.
[12] 王奕佳,刘焱序,宋爽,等. 社区尺度社会—生态系统适应途径述评[J]. 地理科学进展,2022,41(5):935-944.
[13] 杨新军,张慧,王子侨. 基于情景分析的西北农村社会—生态系统脆弱性研究——以榆中县中连川乡为例[J]. 地理科学,2015,35(8):952-959.
[14] Engle N L,Lemos M C.Unpacking governance:Building adaptive capacity to climate change of river basins in Brazil[J]. Global Environmental Change,2010,20(1):4-13.
[15] 王群,银马华,杨兴柱,等. 大别山贫困区旅游地社会—生态系统脆弱性时空演变与影响机理[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(8):1663-1679.
[16] 张行,梁小英,刘迪,等. 生态脆弱区社会—生态景观恢复力时空演变及情景模拟[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(7):1450-1466.
[17] Renaud F G,Birkmann J,Damm M,et al.Understanding multiple thresholds of coupled social-ecological systems exposed to natural hazards as external shocks[J]. Natural Hazards,2010,55(3):749-763.
[18] Cumming G S,Barnes S. Perz S,et al.An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience[J]. Ecosystems,2005,8(8):975-987.
[19] 王群,陆林,杨兴柱. 千岛湖社会—生态系统恢复力测度与影响机理[J]. 地理学报,2015,70(5):779-795.
[20] 叶文丽,杨新军,吴孔森,等. 黄土高原社会—生态系统恢复力时空变化特征与影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理,2022,45(3):912-924.
[21] 夏春华,李阳兵,黄孟勤,陈爽,等. 山区社会—生态系统转型测度——以三峡典型库区为例[J]. 生态学报,2023,43(1):274-289.
[22] 宋永永,薛东前,代兰海,等. 陕北能源开发区县域社会剥夺的空间差异与形成机制[J]. 地理与地理信息科学,2019,35(1):109-117.
[23] 樊杰,李思思,郭锐. 中国式现代化与我们的使命担当——对地理学、人文与经济地理学自主知识创新的讨论[J]. 经济地理,2023,43(1):1-9.
[24] 刘焱序,傅伯杰,王帅,等. 空间恢复力理论支持下的人地系统动态研究进展[J]. 地理学报,2020,75(5):891-903.
[25] Brown K.Global environmental change I:A social turn for resilience?[J]. Progress in Human Geography,2014,38(1):107-117.
[26] 吴传钧. 论地理学的研究核心——人地关系地域系统[J]. 经济地理,1991,11(3):1-6.
[27] 文琦,侯凯元,郑殿元,等. 成长型资源城市产业转型能力评价与优化路径——以榆林市为例[J]. 地理科学,2022,42(4):682-691.
[28] 宋永永,薛东前,代兰海,等. 陕北能源开发区产业转型升级特征及其经济效应[J]. 浙江大学学报:理学版,2019,46(1):121-130.
[29] 宋永永,薛东前,马蓓蓓,等. 黄土高原城镇化过程及其生态环境响应格局[J]. 经济地理,2020,40(6):174-184.
[30] 唐宇,宋永永,薛东前,等. 能源富集区经济韧性演化过程及影响机制——以榆林市为例[J]. 资源科学,2022,44(7):1331-1343.
[31] 王群,杨万明,朱跃,等. 贫困区旅游地社会—生态系统恢复力时空分异研究——以安徽境内大别山区12个贫困县(市)为例[J]. 地理科学,2021,41(6):1030-1038.
[32] Maria Berrouet L,Machado J,Villegas-Palacio C.Vulnerability of socio—ecological systems:A conceptual framework[J]. Ecological Indicators,2018,84:632-647.
[33] Liang J Jg,Li Y F.Resilience and sustainable development goals based social-ecological indicators and assessment of coastal urban areas——A case study of Dapeng New District,Shenzhen,China[J]. Watershed Ecology and the Environment,2020,2:6-15.
[34] 朱晏君,李红波,胡晓亮,等. 欠发达地区县域乡村社会—生态系统韧性研究[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2022,45(1):11-20.
[35] 胡蒙蒙,张军民,黄锦楼,等. 鄂尔多斯社会—生态系统恢复力评价及驱动机制研究[J]. 水土保持研究,2017,24(4):191-197.
[36] 赵克勤. 集对分析及其初步应用[M]. 杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,2000.
[37] 丁建军,王璋,柳艳红,等. 中国连片特困区经济韧性测度及影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学进展,2020,39(6):924-937.
[38] 苏飞,张平宇,李鹤. 中国煤矿城市经济系统脆弱性评价[J]. 地理研究,2008,27(4):907-916.
[39] 文琦,万媛媛,陆冰洁,等. 中国能源地理学研究进展及展望[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(11):95-102,132.
[40] 黄晓军,王博,刘萌萌,等. 社会—生态系统恢复力研究进展——基于CiteSpace的文献计量分析[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(8):3007-3017.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉