区域经济与理论方法

认知邻近对中国企业绿地投资行业选择影响的实证研究

展开
  • 1.北京大学 城市与环境学院,中国 北京 100871;
    2.北京大学—林肯研究院城市发展与土地政策研究中心,中国 北京 100871;
李诗韵(1995—),女,博士研究生,研究方向为经济地理与产业发展。E-mail:lishiyun@stu.pku.edu.cn
※贺灿飞(1972—),男,博士,教授,研究方向为经济地理、产业与区域经济。E-mail:hecanfei@urban.pku.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2023-07-13

  修回日期: 2023-12-07

  网络出版日期: 2024-06-03

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(42171169)

An Empirical Study on the Impact of Cognitive Proximity on the Industry Decision of Chinese Firms' Greenfield Investments

Expand
  • 1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China;
    2. Peking University-Lincoln Institute Center for Urban Development and Land Policy,Beijing 100871,China

Received date: 2023-07-13

  Revised date: 2023-12-07

  Online published: 2024-06-03

摘要

文章基于fDi Markets绿地投资数据,在企业比较优势的基础上,充分考虑了企业潜在比较优势和本地相关知识溢出的双重影响,从认知邻近的视角探究中国企业绿地投资的行业选择问题。结果表明:①中国跨国企业同时存在行业内投资和跨行业投资行为,投资行业与自身知识库联系紧密但又不完全一致。②中国企业绿地投资的行业选择同时受到企业潜在比较优势和城市相关知识溢出的显著影响。③企业异质性显示,外资企业和国有企业绿地投资仅依赖自身能力,而民营企业的本地嵌入性更强,更加依赖城市知识库;小规模企业和首次绿地投资企业因自身缺乏经验,也更加依赖城市知识库。④城市异质性显示,企业所在城市经济复杂度越高、创新能力越强,其绿地投资行业决策越可能受到城市知识库的影响。此外,研究还有助于认识中国企业绿地投资行业演替的微观过程及其机理,为中国“走出去”战略的有效实施提供政策建议。

本文引用格式

李诗韵, 李文韬, 贺灿飞 . 认知邻近对中国企业绿地投资行业选择影响的实证研究[J]. 经济地理, 2024 , 44(2) : 10 -11 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2024.02.002

Abstract

Using the greenfield investment data of fDi Markets,this article explores the industry choices of Chinese firms' greenfield investments from the perspective of cognitive proximity based on firms' comparative advantages,with full consideration of the dual impacts of firms' potential comparative advantages and locally relevant knowledge spillovers. Firstly,Chinese multinational enterprises have both intra-industry and cross-industry investments,and the investment industries are closely, but not entirely, aligned with their own knowledge bases. Secondly, the industry choices of Chinese firms' greenfield investments are significantly influenced by both the firms' potential comparative advantages and city-related knowledge spillovers. Thirdly, foreign and state-owned enterprises rely only on their own capabilities to select sectors for greenfield investment,while private enterprises rely more on the urban knowledge base due to their greater local embeddedness. Small-scale enterprises and first-time greenfield investors also rely more on the urban knowledge base due to their lack of experience. Similarly,urban heterogeneity shows that the more complex or innovative the city's economy is,the more likely it is that the sectors chosen for firms' greenfield investments are influenced by the city's knowledge base. In addition, this study also helps to understand the micro-processes and mechanisms of the evolution of Chinese enterprises' greenfield investment sectors,and provides policy recommendations for the effective implementation of China's "Going Global" strategy.

参考文献

[1] 刘宇,沈坤荣. 以高质量对外直接投资促进中国企业攀升全球价值链[J]. 求是学刊,2022,49(2):67-77.
[2] 刘笑萍,蒋依鸣. 中国制造业企业海外多元化投资与经营绩效[J]. 国际贸易,2022(10):87-95.
[3] Liao H,Yang L,Dai S,et al.Outward FDI,industrial structure upgrading and domestic employment:empirical evidence from the Chinese economy and the belt and road initiative[J]. Journal of Asian Economics,2021,74:101-303.
[4] Jiang M,Luo S,Zhou G.Financial development,OFDI spillovers and upgrading of industrial structure[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2020,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119974.
[5] Nugent J B,Lu J.China’s outward foreign direct investment in the Belt and Road Initiative:What are the motives for Chinese firms to invest?[J]. China Economic Review,2021,DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101628.
[6] He C,Xie X,Zhu S.Going global:understanding China’s outward foreign direct investment from motivational and institutional perspectives[J]. Post-Communist Economies,2015,27(4):448-471.
[7] Zhou K,Kumar S,Yu L,et al.The economic policy uncertainty and the choice of entry mode of outward foreign direct investment:Cross-border M&A or Greenfield Investment[J]. Journal of Asian Economics,2021,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101306.
[8] Gunessee S,Hu S.Chinese cross‐border mergers and acquisitions in the developing world:Is Africa unique?[J]. Thunderbird International Business Review,2021,63(1):27-41.
[9] Chen J,Liu Y,Liu W.Investment facilitation and China’s outward foreign direct investment along the belt and road[J]. China Economic Review,2020,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101458.
[10] Ramasamy B,Yeung M,Laforet S.China’s outward foreign direct investment:Location choice and firm ownership[J]. Journal of World Business,2012,47(1):17-25.
[11] 刘晓凤,葛岳静,赵亚博. 国家距离与中国企业在“一带一路”投资区位选择[J]. 经济地理,2017,37(11):99-108.
[12] Lv P,Curran L,Spigarelli F,et al.One country,many industries:Heterogeneity of Chinese OFDI motivations at meso level[J]. China Economic Review,2021,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101672.
[13] Mudambi R,Li L,Ma X,et al.Zoom in,zoom out:Geographic scale and multinational activity[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2018,49(8):929-941.
[14] Hymer S H.The international operations of national firms,a study of direct foreign investment[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1977,85(5):1096-1098.
[15] Buckley P J,Casson M C.Analyzing foreign market entry strategies:Extending the internalization approach[J]. Journal of international business studies,1998,29:539-561.
[16] Dunning J H.Toward an eclectic theory of international production:Some empirical tests[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,1980,11(1):9-31.
[17] Conconi P,Sapir A,Zanardi M.The internationalization process of firms:From exports to FDI[J]. Journal of International Economics,2016,99:16-30.
[18] 李伟,贺灿飞. 区域新产业发展路径:研究述评与展望[J]. 区域经济评论,2020,48(6):12-24.
[19] 杨博飞,朱晟君,高菠阳. 基于文献视角的海外对华投资和中国对外投资的比较[J]. 经济地理,2021,41(5):122-133.
[20] 周沂,贺灿飞,杨汝岱. 区域潜在比较优势与出口升级[J]. 经济研究,2022,57(2):125-141.
[21] Delios A,Gaur A S,Makino S.The timing of international expansion:Information,rivalry and imitation among Japanese firms,1980-2002[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2008,45(1):169-195.
[22] Porter M E.The competitive advantage of notions[J]. Harvard Business Review,1990,73:91.
[23] 贺灿飞,李伟. 演化经济地理学与区域发展[J]. 区域经济评论,2020(1):39-54.
[24] 陈阵,李亚茹. 海外市场风险如何影响中国企业的国际化进程?[J]. 世界经济研究,2019(5):92-106,136.
[25] 赵云辉,陶克涛,李亚慧,等. 中国企业对外直接投资区位选择——基于QCA方法的联动效应研究[J]. 中国工业经济,2020(11):118-136.
[26] Chen Y,Chao Y,Liu W,et al.Make friends,not money:How Chinese enterprises select transport infrastructure investment locations along the Belt and Road[J]. Transport Policy,2021,101:119-132.
[27] 郭琪,周沂,贺灿飞. 出口集聚、企业相关生产能力与企业出口扩展[J]. 中国工业经济,2020,386(5):137-155.
[28] Li W,Guo B,Xu G.Making the next move:When does the newness of experience matter in overseas sequential entries of multinational companies?[J]. International Business Review,2017,26(5):908-926.
[29] 王疆. 组织间模仿、环境不确定性与区位选择:以中国企业对美国直接投资为例[J]. 管理学报,2014,11(12):1775-1781.
[30] Burrus R T,Graham J E,Jones A T.Regional innovation and firm performance[J]. Journal of Business Research,2018,88:357-362.
[31] Burlina C,Casadei P,Crociata A.Economic complexity and firm performance in the cultural and creative sector:Evidence from Italian provinces[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies,2023,30(2):152-171.
[32] Pierce J R,Schott P K.A concordance between ten-digit US Harmonized System Codes and SIC/NAICS product classes and industries[J]. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement,2012,37(1-2):61-96.
[33] Hidalgo C A,Klinger B,Barabási A L,et al. The product space conditions the development of nations[J]. Science,2007,317(5837):482-487.
[34] Tian Z.Measuring agglomeration using the standardized location quotient with a bootstrap method[J]. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy,2013,43(2):186-197.
[35] 贺灿飞,陈韬. 供给侧路径、需求侧路径与出口比较优势提升[J]. 中国工业经济,2021(10):98-116.
文章导航

/