城市地理与新型城镇化

长江三角洲城际客流网络的时空特征与影响因素——基于年内春运与小长假的异同性分析

展开
  • 安徽师范大学 地理与旅游学院,中国安徽 芜湖 241002
张宇(1988—),男,博士研究生,研究方向为区域发展与区域规划。E-mail:1055006221@qq.com
※ 曹卫东(1973—),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为区域发展与交通物流。E-mail:weidongwh@163.com

收稿日期: 2023-02-27

  修回日期: 2023-06-14

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-29

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41571124)

Spatial Characteristics of Intercity Passenger Flow Network in the Yangtze River Delta and Its Influencing Factors:Based on the Spring Rush and Other Short Holidays’ Rush

Expand
  • School of Geography and Tourism,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241002,Anhui,China

Received date: 2023-02-27

  Revised date: 2023-06-14

  Online published: 2024-03-29

摘要

作为中国经济引擎和改革试验区,探测长江三角洲年内各时期城际客流网络的异同性更能透析空间一体化发展的新特征新问题。基于年内春运与小长假的居民城际出行数据,从“点—线—面”维度对长江三角洲城际客流网络时空特征展开比较分析、探知影响因素和潜藏规律。研究表明:①两时期长江三角洲城市客流量趋向“西北—东南”的分布方向,形成“一主四副”核心的“フ”形空间格局,且边缘地带城市的客流量在春运更高。②小长假日均客流量远高于春运;小长假64.66%的客流量集聚于省内且局域空间一体化最密切,春运47.69%的客流量发生在省际且全域空间一体化更紧密。③春运形成3种城市组团类型,小长假以省域单一型城市组团为主且空间结构更加清晰;首位城市与边缘地带城市的客流联系在春运更紧密;受到择优联系、邻近链接和路径依赖的制约,两时期形成3种空间组织模式,尤其春运更趋复杂。④两时期城际客流网络发育受到城市属性、出行成本、邻近关系、人口特性和历史惯性的共同影响,但解释变量差异明显。希冀能为推动形成优势互补高质量一体化发展的区域新布局提供实践指导。

本文引用格式

张宇, 曹卫东 . 长江三角洲城际客流网络的时空特征与影响因素——基于年内春运与小长假的异同性分析[J]. 经济地理, 2023 , 43(11) : 91 -103 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.11.010

Abstract

This study performs a comparative analysis of the spatiotemporal characteristics of the intercity passenger flow network from the point-line-surface dimension based on the residents' intercity travel data during the Spring Rush and other short holidays' rush,and identifies its influencing factors and laws. It's found that: 1) The passenger flow of the Yangtze River Delta shows the distribution characteristics of "northwest-southeast" direction during the two-type rush periods,and forms spatial pattern with "one core and four sub-cores",and the passenger flow in the fringe areas of cities is higher in the Spring Rush. 2) The average daily flow in the other short holidays' rush is much higher than that in the Spring Rush. 64.66% of the passenger flow is concentrated within the province and forms the closest spatial integration in the other short holidays' rush; 47.69% of the passenger flow occurs in the inter-provincial during the the Spring Rush and forms the closer spatial integration of the whole area. 3) There is three types of city groups during the Spring Rush. It's dominated by city group which is located in the same province in the other short holidays' rush,whose spatial structure is more clear. It has stronger passenger flow links between the first city and the cities in the fringe areas in the Spring Rush. Due to merit-based connection,adjacent link and path dependence,it forms three spatial organization patterns in the two periods,the spatial organization pattern is more complex in the Spring Rush. 4) The development of intercity passenger flow network in the two periods is influenced by a combination of the urban attributes,travel cost,proximity,population characteristics and historical inertia,but the explanatory variables differ significantly.

参考文献

[1] 孙九霞,周尚意,王宁,等. 跨学科聚焦的新领域:流动的时间、空间与社会[J]. 地理研究,2016,35(10):1801-1818.
[2] 张宇,曹卫东,梁双波,等. 中国春运城际出行网络结构特征与城市角色识别——基于多元交通客流的测度[J]. 地理研究,2021,40(9):2526-2541.
[3] 习近平. 推动形成优势互补高质量发展的区域经济布局[J]. 求是,2019(24):4-9.
[4] 王士君,廉超,赵梓渝. 从中心地到城市网络:中国城镇体系研究的理论转变[J]. 地理研究,2019,38(1):64-74.
[5] Castells M.Globalisation,networking,urbanisation:Reflections on the spatial dynamics of the information age[J]. Urban Studies,2010,47(13):2737-2745.
[6] 杨喜平,方志祥. 移动定位大数据视角下的人群移动模式及城市空间结构研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2018,37(7):880-889.
[7] 李梦程,王成新,刘海猛,等. 黄河流域城市发展质量评价与空间联系网络特征[J]. 经济地理,2021,41(12):84-93.
[8] 张宇,梁双波,曹卫东,等. 长江三角洲船舶代理服务业空间组织网络时空演化:基于两省一市分析[J]. 人文地理,2018,33(2):92-99.
[9] Ma H T,Fang C L,Lin S N,et al.Hierarchy,clusters,and spatial differences in Chinese inter-city networks constructed by scientific collaborators[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2018,28(12):1793-1809.
[10] 桂钦昌,杜德斌,刘承良,等. 全球城市知识流动网络的结构特征与影响因素[J]. 地理研究,2021,40(5):1320-1337.
[11] Chen W,Liu W D,Ke W Q,et al.Understanding spatial structures and organizational patterns of city networks in China:A highway passenger flow perspective[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2018,28(4):477-494.
[12] 贺灿飞,余昌达. 多维邻近性、贸易壁垒与中国—世界市场的产业联系动态演化[J]. 地理学报,2022,77(2):275-294.
[13] 李涛,王姣娥,高兴川. 中国居民工作日与节假日的城际出行网络异同性研究[J]. 地理学报,2020,75(4):833-848.
[14] 刘耀彬,孙敏. 基于信息流的工作日与节假日城市网络联系特征对比——以长江中游城市群为例[J]. 经济地理,2021,41(5):75-84.
[15] 温锋华,古恒宇,许志斌. 中国省际人口迁移网络结构及时空演化[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(6):13-21,54.
[16] 陈艳如,谷跃,宋伟轩,等. 长三角流动人口居留意愿差异及其影响因素[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(9):59-67.
[17] Zhou J P,Murphy E,Long Y.Commuting efficiency in the Beijing metropolitan area:An exploration combining smartcard and travel survey data[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2014,41:175-183.
[18] 王垚,钮心毅,宋小冬. 基于城际出行的长三角城市群空间组织特征[J]. 城市规划,2021,45(11):43-53.
[19] 刘望保,石恩名. 基于ICT 的中国城市间人口日常流动空间格局:以百度迁徙为例[J]. 地理学报,2016,71(10):1667-1679.
[20] 王会昌. 中国文化地理[M]. 武汉:华中师范大学出版社,1992.
[21] 马晓冬,胡颖,黄彪. 江苏省乡村绿色发展的时空特征及影响因素[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(4):159-167.
[22] Guimerà R,Amaral L A.Cartography of complex networks:Modules and universal roles[J]. Journal of Statistical Mechanics:Theory and Experiment,2005,DOI:10.1088/1742-5468/2005/02/P02001.
[23] Meo P D,Ferrara E,Fiumara G,et al.Fast unfolding of communities in large networks[J]. Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory & Experiment,2008(10):155-168.
[24] 刘军. 整体网分析:UCINET 软件实用指南(第三版)[M]. 上海:格致出版社,上海人民出版社,2019.
[25] Luo J D,Cheng M Y,Zhang T.Guanxi circle and organizational citizenship behavior:Context of a Chinese workplace[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2016,33(3):649-671.
[26] 安徽省统计局. 安徽统计年鉴(2019)[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社,2019.
文章导航

/