旅游经济与管理

元阳哈尼梯田遗产乡村聚落韧性测度及优化策略——以多依树村为例

展开
  • 1.昆明理工大学 建筑与城市规划学院,中国云南 昆明 650500;
    2.湖南城市学院 建筑与城市规划学院,中国湖南 益阳 413000;
    3.数字化城乡空间规划关键技术湖南省重点实验室,中国湖南 益阳 413000
高钰桔(1998—),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为传统村落保护与活化、遗产保护。E-mail:849145995@qq.com
※毛志睿(1972—),男,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为遗产保护与乡村规划。E-mail:286604737@qq.com

收稿日期: 2022-09-13

  修回日期: 2023-02-10

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-29

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(52168004); 湖南省自然科学基金项目(2022JJ50279)

Resilience Measurement of Rural Settlement in Hani Terrace Field Heritage in Yuanyang and Its Optimization Strategy:A Case Study of Duoyishu Village

Expand
  • 1. Faculty of Architecture and City Planning,Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kunming 650500,Yunnan,China;
    2. College of Architecture and Urban Planning,Hunan City University,Yiyang 413000,Hunan,China;
    3. Key Technologies of Digital Urban Rural Spatial Planning,Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory,Yiyang 413000,Hunan,China

Received date: 2022-09-13

  Revised date: 2023-02-10

  Online published: 2024-03-29

摘要

文章基于社会生态韧性的演化思维,建立了以“应对长期、隐性、缓慢冲击的韧性”和“韧性为增进本地居民利益”为考量的乡村聚落韧性测度指标体系。以多依树聚落为例,运用层次分析法、量表打分和模糊评价法、自然断点法,测度其韧性发展现状,据此探索同一行政村内不同韧性水平聚落的韧性提升策略。研究表明:①多依树聚落韧性整体处于中等水平。在各维度韧性评价序列中,社会韧性水平最高,其后依次为空间韧性、制度韧性、经济韧性、生态韧性和文化韧性。②遗产地村域内聚落之间在各个维度的韧性能力存在明显差异,获得较好政策扶持和积极发展遗产旅游业的社区,其聚落韧性水平相对较高。③人口老龄化、乡村建设用地破碎、保护规划实施不利、旅游开发单一、自然灾害频发、传统文化传承人减少是多依树聚落不同维度韧性能力的短板。④依据遗产地乡村聚落韧性水平将其分为巩固稳健类、提高适应类和学习转型类等3种类型,对应韧性优化策略为:巩固稳健类乡村聚落应巩固应对干扰的抵御能力,加强乡村自身基底的自稳健性,关键是要降低自然灾害发生的频率,构建社会网络结构,加强聚落间经济的互补;提高适应类乡村聚落要增强对于扰动的更新适应能力,完善干扰预警应对机制,运用现代方式演绎历史文化,提升聚落社区的自组织性,创新文化活态传承,此外,要严格乡村聚落建设用地的管控;学习转型类乡村聚落应注重村落改革发展引擎的提质改进,注意多元主体的协同参与和社区保障机制的建设与健全。

本文引用格式

高钰桔, 毛志睿, 陈笑葵, 易纯 . 元阳哈尼梯田遗产乡村聚落韧性测度及优化策略——以多依树村为例[J]. 经济地理, 2023 , 43(8) : 220 -228 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.08.022

Abstract

Based on the evolutionary thinking of social ecological resilience,the article establishes the measurement index system of rural settlement resilience that considers "resilience to cope with long-term,implicit,and slow impacts" and "resilience to enhance the interests of local residents". Taking the Duoyishu Village as an example and using AHP,scale scoring,fuzzy evaluation,and natural breakpoint method,this study measures its resilience development status,and explores resilience improvement strategies for settlements with different resilience levels within the same administrative village. Research shows that: 1) The overall resilience of Duoyishu Village is at a moderate level. The resilience values of each dimension are ranked,social resilience is at the highest level,followed by spatial resilience,institutional resilience,economic resilience,ecological resilience,and cultural resilience. 2) There are significant differences in the resilience capabilities of settlements in heritage sites in various dimensions. Communities that receive good policy support and actively develop heritage tourism have relatively high resilience level. 3) Aging population,fragmented rural construction land,unfavorable implementation of protection planning,single tourism development,frequent natural disasters, and a decrease in the number of inheritors of traditional culture are the weaknesses in the resilience of Duoyishu Village in different dimensions. 4) According to the resilience level of rural settlements in heritage sites,it can be divided into three types: consolidation and stability type, improvement and adaptation type, and learning and transformation type. At the type of consolidation and stability settlement, it should strengthen their resistance to interference, strengthen the self stability of the rural base,and reduce the frequency of natural disasters,construct social network structures,and strengthen the economic complementarity between settlements. At the type of improvement and adaptation settlement, it should enhance their ability to update and adapt to disturbances, improve the interference warning and response mechanism, use modern methods to interpret historical culture, enhance the self-organization of settlement communities, innovate cultural heritage, and strictly control the management of rural settlement construction land. At the type of learning and transformation settlement, it should focus on improving the quality of the development engine of village reform, and pay attention to the collaborative participation of multiple entities and the construction of community security mechanism.

参考文献

[1] 邓明艳. 世界遗产旅游基本问题研究[J]. 乐山师范学院学报,2005,20(10):97-101.
[2] 汪侠,甄峰,沈丽珍,等. 基于贫困居民视角的旅游扶贫满意度评价[J]. 地理研究,2017,36(12):2355-2368.
[3] 孙业红,闵庆文,成升魁,等. 农业文化遗产的旅游资源特征研究[J]. 旅游学刊,2010,25(10):57-62.
[4] 贾垚焱,胡静,刘大均,等. 山区民族旅游地乡村聚落韧性评估及尺度关联研究[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(8):194-204.
[5] 王向彬,朱铨. 乡村韧性研究进展与展望[J]. 资源开发与市场,2022,38(3):321-327.
[6] 王群,银马华,杨兴柱,等. 大别山贫困区旅游地社会—生态系统脆弱性时空演变与影响机理[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(8):1663-1679.
[7] 李红波. 韧性理论视角下乡村聚落研究启示[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(4):556-562.
[8] McAslan A. The concept of resilience:Understanding its origins,meaning and utility[J]. Torrens Resilience Institute,2010:1-13.
[9] Holling C S.Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1973,4(4):1-23.
[10] Holling C S.Engineering Resilience Versus Ecological Resilience[M]. Washington DC:National Academies Press,1996.
[11] 臧鑫宇,王峤. 城市韧性的概念演进、研究内容与发展趋势[J]. 科技导报,2019,37(22):94-104.
[12] Adger W N.Social and ecological resilience:Are they related?[J]. Progress in Human Geography,2000,24(3):347-364.
[13] Arouri M,Nguyen C,Youssef A B.Natural disasters,household welfare,and resilience:Evidence from rural Vietnam[J]. World Development,2015,70:59-77.
[14] Hollday P J,Powell R B.Resident perceptions of social-ecological resilience and the sustainability of community-based tourism development in the Commonwealth of Dominic[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism,2013,21(8):1188-1211.
[15] Quandt A.Measuring livelihood resilience:The household livelihood resilience approach (HLRA)[J]. World Development,2018,107:253-263.
[16] Schwarz A M,Béné C,Bennett G,et al.Vulnerability and resilience of remote rural communities to shocks and global changes:Empirical analysis from Solomon Islands[J]. Global Environmental Change,2011,21(3):1128-1140.
[17] Alam G M M,Alam K,Mushtaq S,et al. How do climate change and associated hazards impact on the resilience of riparian rural communities in Bangladesh? Policy implications for livelihood development[J]. Environmental Science and Policy,2018,84:7-18.
[18] Li Y H,Westlund H,Liu Y S.Why some rural areas decline whilesome others not:An overview of rural evolution in the world[J].Journal of Rural Studies,2019,68:135-143.
[19] 岳俞余,彭震伟. 乡村聚落社会生态系统的韧性发展研究[J]. 南方建筑,2018(5):4-9.
[20] 曾斌丹,谢静,何银春. 传统村落社区演进韧性评估——以通道县皇都村为例[J]. 湘南学院学报,2022,43(5):37-44.
[21] 何艳冰,周明晖,贾豫霖,等. 基于韧性测度的传统村落旅游高质量发展研究——以河南省为例[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(8):222-231.
[22] 胡霄,李红波,李智,等. 河北省县域乡村韧性测度及时空演变[J]. 地理与地理信息科学,2021,37(3):89-96.
[23] 孟丽君,黄灿,陈鑫,等. 曲周县耕地利用系统韧性评价[J]. 资源科学,2019,41(10):1949-1958.
[24] 王俊,杨新军,刘文兆. 半干旱区社会—生态系统干旱恢复力的定量化研究[J]. 地理科学进展,2010,29(11):1385-1390.
[25] 杨大禹. 对云南红河哈尼族传统民居形态传承的思考[J]. 南方建筑,2010(6):18-27.
[26] 高凯,符禾. 生态智慧视野下的红河哈尼梯田文化景观世界遗产价值研究[J]. 风景园林,2014(6):64-68.
[27] 角媛梅,杨有洁,胡文英,等. 哈尼梯田景观空间格局与美学特征分析[J]. 地理研究,2006,25(4):624-632.
[28] 顾燕燕,孙攀,郑军德. 韧性乡村对乡村建设的意义探究[J]. 绿色科技,2019(4):205-208.
[29] 张小林. 乡村概念辨析[J]. 地理学报,1998,53(4):365-371.
[30] 岳俞余,高璟. 基于社会生态系统视角的乡村聚落韧性评价——以河南省汤阴县为例[J]. 小城镇建设,2019,37(1):5-14.
[31] Walker B,Holling C S,Carpenter S R,et al. Resilience,adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems[J]. Ecology and Society,2004,https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205.
[32] 买欣,陶伟,刘望保. 国内外乡村韧性研究进展评述[J]. 人文地理,2023,38(2):28-34.
[33] Cutter S L.Resilience to what?Resilience for whom?[J]. The Geographical Journal,2016,182(2):110-113.
[34] 杨立国,刘沛林. 传统村落文化传承度评价体系及实证研究——以湖南省首批中国传统村落为例[J]. 经济地理,2017,37(12):203-210.
[35] 邹君,刘媛,谭芳慧,等. 传统村落景观脆弱性及其定量评价——以湖南省新田县为例[J]. 地理科学,2018,38(8):1292-1300
[36] 王璇. 元阳哈尼梯田多依树景区村民可持续生计研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2020.
[37] 屈册,金钰涵,张朝枝. 哈尼梯田“申遗”过程与旅游发展中的权力实践[J]. 广西民族大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2018,40(3):64-69.
[38] 张永勋,闵庆文,李先德. 红河哈尼稻作梯田旅游资源价值空间差异评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2018,26(7):971-979.
[39] 毛佑全. 哈尼族文化初探[M]. 昆明:云南民族出版社,1991.
文章导航

/