EN中文

经济地理 >

2023 , Vol. 43 >Issue 8: 210 - 219

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.08.021

旅游经济与管理

苏州城市生态旅游舒适性空间格局演变及溢出效应

展开
  • 1.苏州大学 社会学院,中国江苏 苏州 215123;
    2.苏州大学 文化与旅游发展研究院,中国江苏 苏州 215123;
    3.中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所,中国 北京 100101
黄泰（1977—）,男,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为城乡发展与旅游规划。E-mail：huangtai_fx@163.com
※卫嫚（1997—）,女,博士研究生,研究方向为旅游规划与管理。E-mail：weimango@foxmail.com

收稿日期: 2023-04-04

  修回日期: 2023-08-11

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-29

基金资助

国家社会科学基金项目（17BGL123）

收起

Evolution and Spillover Effect of Urban Ecotourism Amenity Spatial Pattern in Suzhou

Expand
  • 1. School of Social Science,Soochow University,Suzhou 215123,Jiangsu,China;
    2. Academy of Culture and Tourism Research,Soochow University,Suzhou 215123,Jiangsu,China;
    3. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China

Received date: 2023-04-04

  Revised date: 2023-08-11

  Online published: 2024-03-29

Fold

摘要

经济增长和社会转型促使舒适性成为旅游者空间流动的重要因素,生态旅游可以化解城镇化与生态保护之间的冲突,从舒适性视角解析大城市生态旅游演变规律可为构建大城市高质量发展格局提供理论支撑。文章基于城市舒适性理论和场景理论,以苏州市区为例,利用最小阻力模型、空间连续小波变换、空间计量模型等多元集成方法,解析2010—2020年大城市生态旅游舒适性格局演变与溢出效应。研究发现：①苏州城市生态旅游舒适性逐渐提升,舒适性类型由生态主导型向综合型演变。②苏州城市生态旅游舒适性核心区为城市边缘的生态聚集型,通过舒适性增长的空间溢出带动其他区域共同发展,且空间溢出随距离增加呈现“倒U型”发展趋势。③苏州应营造以“核心区—联动区—辐射区—边缘区”为圈层、以生态旅游源地为节点,通过生态旅游舒适性核心廊道联通的生态旅游舒适性空间。文章对协调大城市发展与保护的共生关系、推动以人为中心的新型城镇化发展等具有现实指导意义。

关键词： 城市生态旅游; 舒适性; 溢出效应; 空间连续小波变换; 空间营造; 廊道; 苏州

本文引用格式

黄泰, 卫嫚, 席建超 . 苏州城市生态旅游舒适性空间格局演变及溢出效应[J]. 经济地理, 2023 , 43(8) : 210 -219 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.08.021

Abstract

Economic growth and social transformation make amenity become an important factor in tourist space flow. Ecotourism can resolve the conflict between large-scale urbanization development and ecological protection. Explaining the evolution law of ecotourism in big cities from the perspective of amenity can provide theoretical support for the construction of high-quality pattern of big cities. Based on urban amenity theory and scene theory, and taking Suzhou City as the research object, this paper analyzes the evolution and spillover effect of ecotourism amenity pattern in big city from 2010 to 2020 by the means of the minimal cumulative resistance,spatial continuous wavelet transform and spatial measurement model. The results show that: 1) The amenity of urban ecotourism in Suzhou has gradually improved, and the amenity type has evolved from ecological-oriented type to comprehensive type. 2) The core area of urban ecotourism amenity in Suzhou is an ecological aggregation type at the edge of the city, which can drive other areas to develop together through the spatial spillover of amenity growth,and the spatial spillover presents an "inverted U-shaped" development trend with the increase of distance. 3) Suzhou should create an ecotourism amenity space taking "core area-linkage area-radiation area-edge area" as the circle layer, ecotourism source as the node. which is connected by ecotourism amenity core corridor. In conclusion,this paper has practical guiding significance for coordinating the symbiotic relationship between the development and protection of big cities and promoting the development of people-centered new urbanization.

Key words： urban ecotourism; amenity; spillover effect; spatial continuous wavelet transform; space construction; corridor; Suzhou

参考文献

[1] He Z Y,Liu Q Y,Zhao P J.Challenges of passenger and freight transportation in mega-city regions:A systematic literature review[J]. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives,2022,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100730.
[2] 王业强,魏后凯. 大城市效率锁定与中国城镇化路径选择[J]. 中国人口科学,2018(2):24-38,126.
[3] 余玲,刘家明,李涛,等. 中国城市公共游憩空间研究进展[J]. 地理学报,2018,73(10):1923-1941.
[4] 苏飞,莫潇杭,童磊,等. 旅游地社会—生态系统适应性研究进展[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(2):280-288.
[5] 李华,刘志国. 城市生态旅游的认知度研究——以上海为例[J]. 世界地理研究,2014,23(1):158-166.
[6] Ullman E L.Amenities as a factor in regional growth[J]. Geographical Review,1954,44(1):119-132.
[7] Hjerpe E,Hussain A,Holmes T.Amenity migration and public lands:Rise of the protected areas[J]. Environmental Management,2020,66(1):56-71.
[8] 胡宇娜,马鑫涛,刘继生,等. 基于GPS数据的海岛型目的地游客时空行为相似性研究——以山东长岛为例[J]. 地理科学,2022,42(11):1954-1962.
[9] 蔚丹丹,李山,张粮锋,等. 旅游气候舒适性评价:模型优化与中国案例[J]. 旅游学刊,2021,36(5):14-28.
[10] Malinović-Milićević S,Petrović M D,Radovanović M M.Evaluation of outdoor thermal comfort conditions:Evidence from the Serbian major ski resort over the last 30 years[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology,2023,67(5):807-819.
[11] 席天宇,王翘楚,丁建华,等. 寒地城市景点旅游人群热舒适差异化对比研究[J]. 建筑科学,2019,35(10):124-129.
[12] 耿树丰,国安东,杨俊,等. 中国绿色旅游基地适宜性综合评价[J]. 地理科学,2019,39(9):1507-1515.
[13] Ambo F B,Frederick N,Tata T H,et al.Assessment of ecotourism potentials in the north west region of Cameroon[J]. Earth Sciences,2022,11(5):250-259.
[14] Ghous M,Siddiqui S. GIS-based site suitability evaluation for ecotourism development in Salt Range Wetlands,Punjab-Pakistan[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2022,https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-11037-x.
[15] 张飞,杨林生,何勋,等. 大运河遗产河道游憩利用适宜性评价[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(7):1114-1123.
[16] Fadafan F K,Soffianian A,Pourmanafi S,et al.Assessing ecotourism in a mountainous landscape using GIS-MCDA approaches[J]. Applied Geography,2022,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102743.
[17] Jones G,Spadafora A.Creating ecotourism in costa Rica,1970-2000[J]. Enterprise & Society,2017,18(1):146-183.
[18] 周素,刘国华,周维,等. 红河哈尼梯田遗产区生态系统服务价值外溢研究[J]. 生态学报,2023(7):1-11.
[19] Clark T N,Lloyd R,Wong K K,et al.Amenities drive urban growth:A new paradigm and policy linkages,the city as an entertainment machine[J]. Research in Urban Policy,2003,9(12):291-322.
[20] 吕拉昌,于英杰,栾惠. 北京城市舒适性、差异性与创新能力的关系[J]. 地理科学,2022,42(1):115-125.
[21] Zhang S L,Zheng H Q,Zhou H Y,et al.Sustainable land urbanization,urban amenities,and population urbanization:Evidence from city-level data in China[J]. Social Science Quarterly,2021,102(4):1686-1698.
[22] Silver D A,Clark T N.Scenescapes:How Qualities of Place Shape Social Life[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2016.
[23] 姚新涛,曾坚,吴鼎. 湘西山地生态旅游资源空间结构特征研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(5):246-256.
[24] 丛小丽,黄悦,刘继生. 吉林省生态旅游与旅游环境耦合协调度的时空演化研究[J]. 地理科学,2019,39(3):496-505.
[25] 敬峰瑞,孙虎,袁超. 成都市旅游资源吸引力空间结构特征[J]. 资源科学,2017,39(2):303-313.
[26] 王志远,李欣,蒋超,等. 基于GIS的岳阳市中心城区生态安全格局构建与城市增长管控[J]. 生态科学,2022,41(4):49-59.
[27] 汪晓春,熊峰,王振伟,等. 基于POI大数据与机器学习的养老设施规划布局——以武汉市为例[J]. 经济地理,2021,41(6):49-56.
[28] 陈波,赵润. 中国城市非遗传承场景评价指标体系构建与实证[J]. 华中师范大学学报:人文社会科学版,2020,59(4):78-86.
[29] 穆学青,郭向阳,明庆忠,等. 黄河流域旅游生态安全的动态演变特征及驱动因素[J]. 地理学报,2022,77(3):714-735.
[30] 王成,代蕊莲,陈静,等. 乡村人居环境系统韧性的演变规律及其提升路径——以国家城乡融合发展试验区重庆西部片区为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2022,37(3):645-661.
[31] Ries L,Fletcher R J,Battin J,et al.Ecological responses to habitat edges:Mechanisms,models,and variability explained[J]. Annual Review of Ecology,Evolution,and Systematics,2004,35(1):491-522.
[32] Dong J Q,Peng J,Liu Y X,et al.Integrating spatial continuous wavelet transform and kernel density estimation to identify ecological corridors in megacities[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2020,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103815.
[33] 覃成林,杨霞. 先富地区带动了其他地区共同富裕吗——基于空间外溢效应的分析[J]. 中国工业经济,2017(10):44-61.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉