EN中文

经济地理 >

2022 , Vol. 42 >Issue 6: 144 - 155

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.06.015

三农、土地与生态

乡村振兴重点帮扶县农村基本公共服务的多维减贫效应

展开
  • 1.首都师范大学 资源环境与旅游学院,中国 北京 100048;
    2.首都师范大学 三维信息获取与应用教育部重点实验室,中国 北京 100048;
    3.首都师范大学 城市环境过程与数字模拟国家重点实验室培育基地,中国 北京 100048;
    4.中国四维测绘技术有限公司,中国 北京 100086
孙玥（1999—）,女,辽宁丹东人,硕士研究生,研究方向为地图学与地理信息系统建模与应用。E-mail：sssyyy163163@163.com

收稿日期: 2021-12-06

  修回日期: 2022-03-19

  网络出版日期: 2023-10-10

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目（42171224）; 国家重点研发计划项目（2018YFB0505400）; 北京市长城学者资助项目（CIT&TCD20190328）; 全国统计科学研究重点项目（2021LZ23）

收起

Multidimensional Poverty-reduction Effect of Rural Basic Public Services in Key Counties for Rural Revitalization

Expand
  • 1. College of Resource Environment and Tourism,Capital Normal University,Beijing 100048,China;
    2. Key Laboratory of 3D Information Acquisition and Application,Ministry of Education,Capital Normal University,Beijing 100048,China;
    3. State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Urban Environmental Processes and Digital Simulation,Capital Normal University,Beijing 100048,China;
    4. China Siwei Surveying and Mapping Technology Co. Ltd.,Beijing 100086,China

Received date: 2021-12-06

  Revised date: 2022-03-19

  Online published: 2023-10-10

Fold

摘要

为探究农村基本公共服务对多维贫困的减贫效应,文章利用2015—2018年云南省福贡县农村多维贫困监测的面板数据,在分别测算村级基本公共服务发展水平和多维贫困水平的基础上,构建时空关联分析模型和动态空间杜宾模型,从整体和分区、分维度层面实证分析探测村级基本公共服务对农户多维贫困的减贫效应。以云南福贡县为研究区的实证结果表明,基本公共服务对农村多维贫困存在减贫效应,且不同类型的农村基本公共服务的减贫效应存在差异。在整体层面,无论在短期还是长期影响下,医疗卫生、基础设施和社会保障服务的减贫效果较为突出,同时其直接效应比间接效应更为显著,表明农村基本公共服务的减贫效应以直接效应为主。在分区层面,多维贫困程度较轻的中段地区其教育、公共文化及信息化服务的减贫效果较好,同时存在间接效应能够缓解邻近地区多维贫困的状况。其中,多维贫困程度较深的研究区北段和南段,其医疗卫生、基础设施和社会保障服务的减贫效果尤为突出。

关键词： 乡村振兴; 农村基本公共服务; 多维贫困; 空间杜宾模型; 减贫效应; 医疗卫生; 社会保障服务

本文引用格式

孙玥, 黄涛, 王艳慧, 玉龙飞雪 . 乡村振兴重点帮扶县农村基本公共服务的多维减贫效应[J]. 经济地理, 2022 , 42(6) : 144 -155 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.06.015

Abstract

In order to explore the multidimensional poverty-reduction effect of rural basic public services,this paper calculates the development level of village-level basic public services and the multidimensional poverty level respectively in Fugong County of Yunnan Province from 2015 to 2018 on the basis of the panel data of rural multidimensional poverty monitoring,and constructs the spatio-temporal correlation analysis model and the dynamic spatial Durbin model. Empirical analysis is made to explore the poverty-reduction effect of village-level basic public services from the perspectives of the whole,the different region and the sub-dimension. The results show that basic public services have a poverty-reduction effect on rural multidimensional poverty,and the poverty-reduction effect of different types of rural basic public services is different. At the overall level,whether in the short term or the long term,the poverty-reduction effect of health care, infrastructure and social security services is prominent. The direct effect is more significant than the indirect effect, which indicates that the poverty-reduction effect of rural basic public services is mainly direct effect. At the regional level,education,public culture and information services have a better effect on the poverty reduction in the middle part of the region with a lower degree of multidimensional poverty,while there is an indirect effect to alleviate multidimensional poverty in the neighboring region. Health care,infrastructure and social security services play an important role on the poverty-reduction effect in the northern and southern sections of the study area with a high degree of multidimensional poverty.

Key words： rural revitalization; rural basic public services; multidimensional poverty; spatial Durbin model; poverty-reduction effect; health care; social security services

参考文献

[1] Shaffer P.Poverty and development in China: Alternative approaches to poverty assessment[J]. The Journal of Development Studies,2013,49(7):1030-1031.
[2] 龙花楼,陈坤秋. 基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展[J]. 地理学报,2021,76(2):295-309.
[3] 迟瑶,王艳慧,房娜. 连片特困区贫困县农村基本公共服务与县域经济时空格局演变关系研究[J]. 地理研究,2016,35(7):1243-1258.
[4] 刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报,2018,73(4):637-650.
[5] 周扬,郭远智,刘彦随. 中国县域贫困综合测度及2020年后减贫瞄准[J]. 地理学报,2018,73(8):1478-1493.
[6] Alkire S,Foster J.Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement[J]. Journal of Public Economics,2007,95(7):476-487.
[7] 施琳娜,文琦. 相对贫困视角下的精准扶贫多维减贫效应研究——以宁夏彭阳县为例[J]. 地理研究,2020,39(5):1139-1151.
[8] Liu Y,Xu Y.A geographic identification of multidimensional poverty in rural China under the framework of sustainable livelihoods analysis[J]. Applied Geography,2016,73(73):62-76.
[9] 李彬,韩增林,马慧强. 辽宁省城市基本公共服务质量差异的时空分析[J]. 人文地理,2015,30(3):111-117.
[10] Gomaa M D,Meraj N M,Ramze A E,et al.GIS-based public services analysis based on municipal election areas:A methodological approach for the city of Makkah,Saudi Arabia[J]. Journal of Geographic Information System,2013(5):378-395.
[11] Neutens T,Delafontaine M,Scott D M,et al.A GIS-based method to identify spatiotemporal gaps in public service delivery[J]. Applied Geography,2012,32(2):253-264.
[12] 马晓冬,沈正平,宋潇君. 江苏省城乡公共服务发展差距及其障碍因素分析[J]. 人文地理,2014,29(1):89-93.
[13] 王晓玲. 我国省区基本公共服务水平及其区域差异分析[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报,2013(3):23-29.
[14] Karnani A.The roles of the private and public sectors in poverty reduction[J]. Journal of Marketing Management,2017,33(17-18):1585-1592.
[15] 曾福生,曾小溪. 基本公共服务减贫实证研究——以湖南省为例[J]. 农业技术经济,2013(8):4-11.
[16] Parker D,Kirkpatrick C,Figueira-Theodorakopoulou C.Infrastructure regulation and poverty reduction in developing countries:A review of the evidence and a research agenda[J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,2008,48(2):177-188.
[17] Wan Y,Wang Y,Gong Z,et al.A study on the coupling relationship between basic public services and multi-dimensional poverty in rural poor areas-empirical analysis based on Hechi city,Guangxi[J]. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry,Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences,2020,5(3):773-780.
[18] 孙晶晶,黄敦平,方建. 我国农村基本公共服务供给对农村贫困减缓的影响研究——基于省际空间面板模型实证分析[J]. 太原理工大学学报:社会科学版,2021,39(3):62-68.
[19] Palamalai S.Causality between public expenditure and economic growth:The Indian case[J]. International Journal of Economics and Management,2014,7(2):335-347.
[20] 兰昊骋,杨帆. 四川藏区基本公共服务对减贫的影响作用分析[J]. 四川农业大学学报,2016,34(1):115-120.
[21] Chen S,Li J,Lu S,et al.Escaping from poverty trap:A choice between government transfer payments and public services[J]. Global Health Research and Policy,2017,2(1):1-16.
[22] 郝晓薇,黄念兵,庄颖. 乡村振兴视角下公共服务对农村多维贫困减贫效应研究[J]. 中国软科学,2019(1):72-81.
[23] Nguyen C V,Giang L T,Tran A N,et al.Do good governance and public administration improve economic growth and poverty reduction?The case of vietnam[J]. International Public Management Journal,2021,24(1):131-161.
[24] Lee L F,Yu J.Estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects[J]. Journal of Econometrics,2010,154(2):165-185.
[25] 陈鸣,姚旭兵. 农村教育投资减缓农村贫困具有空间溢出效应吗?[J]. 教育与经济,2020,36(5):13-21.
[26] 彭雷霆,刘婉娜. 政府公共文化服务供给的减贫效应研究——基于1998—2018年省际面板数据的实证分析[J/OL]. 图书馆建设:1-17. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1331.G2.20210730.1546.017.html,2022-06-23.
[27] 马慧强,廉倩文,韩增林,等. 基本公共服务—城镇化—区域经济耦合协调发展时空演化[J]. 经济地理,2020,40(5):19-28.
[28] 刘传明,张春梅,任启龙,等. 基本公共服务与经济发展互动耦合机制及时空特征——以江苏省13城市为例[J]. 经济地理,2019,39(4):26-33.
[29] 杨洪,徐小飞. 基于云模型的旅游发展绩效评估——以武陵山片区为例[J]. 经济地理,2018,38(2):220-224.
[30] Li D,Han J,Shi X,et al.Knowledge representation and discovery based on linguistic atoms[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,1998,10(7):431-440.
[31] Wang Y H,Chen Y F,Chi Y,et al.Village-level multidimensional poverty measurement in China:Where and how[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2018,28(10):1444-1466
[32] 王艳慧,钱乐毅,段福洲,等. 村级贫困人口多维测算及其贫困特征分析——以河南省内乡县为例[J]. 人口与经济,2014(5):114-120.
[33] 李响,齐文平,谭畅,等. 生态环境脆弱性与多维贫困的耦合关系——基于广西河池市1586个贫困村的实证分析[J]. 应用生态学报,2019,30(12):4303-4312.
[34] 齐文平,王艳慧,万圆,等. 基于G-TOPSIS模型的贫困农户多目标发展评价——以云南福贡县为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2020,39(6):1024-1036.
[35] Martha G R,杨国安. 可持续发展研究方法国际进展:脆弱性分析方法与可持续生计方法比较[J]. 地理科学进展,2003,22(1):11-21.
[36] 崔春生,王怡,李群. 基于博弈论指标综合赋权的物流服务绩效评价[J]. 数学的实践与认识,2019,49(2):110-118.
[37] 王瑜,汪三贵. 基本公共服务减贫:理论概念、现实关切与评估建议[J]. 贵州社会科学,2018(9):164-168.
[38] Mcintyre D,Meheus F,John R.What level of domestic government health expenditure should we aspire to for universal health coverage?[J]. Health Economics Policy and Law,2017,12(2):125-137.
[39] 李涛,张一童. 农村医疗减贫效果被低估了吗——来自社会空间视角的解释[J]. 重庆理工大学学报:社会科学版,2021,35(8):126-137.
[40] 李杰. 我国农村基础设施建设对贫困地区的减贫效应研究[D]. 西安:西北大学,2018.
[41] 罗明忠,邱海兰. 以信息化全面推进减贫治理能力现代化[J]. 乡村振兴,2021(7):26-28.
[42] 常建新. 数字普惠金融发展能够矫正要素错配吗?——基于动态空间杜宾模型的实证分析[J]. 福建金融,2021(8):23-32.
[43] 张博胜,杨子生. 中国城镇化的农村减贫及其空间溢出效应——基于省级面板数据的空间计量分析[J]. 地理研究,2020,39(7):1592-1608.
[44] 王颖,高升. 我国远洋渔业技术进步空间溢出效应分析——基于动态空间杜宾模型[J]. 上海管理科学,2021,43(4):89-94.
[45] Lee L F,Yu J.Estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects[J]. Journal of Econometrics,2010,154(2):165-185.
[46] Belotti F,Hughes G,Mortari A P.Spatial panel-data models using stata[J]. The Stata Journal,2017,17(1):139-180.
[47] 张冲,廖海亚. 规模化经营对粮食生产的影响研究——基于空间计量模型的实证检验[J]. 华中师范大学学报:自然科学版,2021,55(3):462-471.
[48] 章贵军,王芝儒,李峰. “脱贫攻坚”下的减贫弹性:测度方法与区域比较[J]. 统计学报,2021,2(4):1-11.
[49] LeSage J P,Pace R K. A matrix exponential spatial specification[J]. Journal of Econometrics,2007,140(1):190-214.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉