青年论坛

武夷山市旅游发展与景观格局演变的联动关系

展开
  • 1.天津财经大学 商学院,中国 天津 300222;
    2.自然资源部国土整治中心/自然资源部土地整治重点实验室,中国 北京 100035
钟莉娜(1989—),女,山东青岛人,博士,副教授,研究方向为旅游景观生态。E-mail:zhong_lina@163.com

收稿日期: 2021-09-08

  修回日期: 2022-01-05

  网络出版日期: 2023-10-07

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41901254)

Relationship Between Tourism Development and Landscape Pattern Evolution in Wuyishan City

Expand
  • 1. School of Business,Tianjin University of Finance and Economics,Tianjin 300222,China;
    2. Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center& Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation,Beijing 100035,China

Received date: 2021-09-08

  Revised date: 2022-01-05

  Online published: 2023-10-07

摘要

以典型的旅游驱动型城市武夷山市为研究区,基于景观破碎指数、形态学空间格局分析、景观连通度等方法,分析了旅游发展与景观格局演变之间的联动关系。结果表明:①2000—2020年,武夷山市人工表面大面积扩张,城市景观破碎度指数增加而自然景观破碎度指数降低。②核心区、边缘区和空隙面积显著减少,桥接区面积增加,重要程度较高的核心区集中在武夷山市的西北部。③景观格局演变与旅游发展之间存在显著的时空联动关系。④旅游产业发展与城市景观格局演变之间,以城市发展为中介,存在着显著的双向作用过程。旅游发展通过强化城市定位、引导产业用地等方式影响景观格局,同时景观格局变化优化旅游发展环境,二者之间形成联动关系。

本文引用格式

钟莉娜, 李正欢, 王军 . 武夷山市旅游发展与景观格局演变的联动关系[J]. 经济地理, 2022 , 42(3) : 222 -230 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.03.023

Abstract

It is of great significance to the rational utilization of tourism resources that the relationship between tourism development and landscape pattern evolution is explored. Wuyishan City,a typical tourism-driven city,is studied as the research area. The relationship between tourism development and landscape pattern evolution is analyzed by landscape fragmentation index,morphological spatial pattern analysis,landscape connectivity and other methods. The results showed that: 1) Artificial surfaces expanded in a large area and encroached on the surrounding woodland,grassland and arable land from 2000 to 2020. While the urban landscape fragmentation index increased,the natural landscape fragmentation index decreased. 2) Core areas, fringe areas and void areas of Wuyishan City decreased significantly,and bridge areas increased. The more important core areas were concentrated in the northwest of Wuyishan City. And the importance of the eastern core areas was generally declining. 3) There is a significant spatio-temporal linkage between the evolution of landscape pattern and tourism development. 4) There is a significant dual-way process between the development of tourism industry and the evolution of urban landscape pattern,with urban development as the intermediary. Tourism development affects the landscape pattern by strengthening urban orientation and guiding industrial land use. At the same time,the change of landscape pattern optimizes the tourism development environment,and a linkage relationship is formed between the two.

参考文献

[1] Pirnat J.Conservation and management of forest patches and corridors in suburban landscape[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2000,52:135-143.
[2] 张娟,陈凡,角媛梅,等. 哈尼梯田区不同旅游模式村寨土地利用变化对生态系统服务与人类福利的影响[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(15):5179-5189.
[3] 张潇,张晓瑶,陆林,等. 旅游干扰下流域多尺度景观格局演化特征及驱动因素——以新安江流域为例[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(9):3415-3428.
[4] 钟莉娜,滕菲菲,李正欢,等. 生态系统服务视域下的旅游导向型城镇化:框架与展望[J]. 生态环境学报,2020,29(10):2130-2140.
[5] 陈志钢. 风景名胜城市土地利用动态变化及与旅游发展的互动机理研究——以广西壮族自治区阳朔县为例[J]. 资源科学,2010,32(10):1980-1986.
[6] 麻学锋,刘玉林. 旅游产业成长与城市空间形态演变的关系——以张家界为例[J]. 经济地理,2019,39(5):226-234.
[7] 林明太,孙虎,郭斌. 福建旅游型海岛景观格局变化——以妈祖圣地湄洲岛为例[J]. 生态学杂志,2010,29(7):1414-1419.
[8] Abellán F C,Martínez C G.Landscape and tourism as tools for local development in mid-mountain rural areas in the southeast of Spain (Castilla-La Mancha)[J]. Land,2021,10(2):221-240.
[9] Sun J,Zheng Y,Shi J.Conserving the landscape connectivity of natural forest reserves in tourism development[J]. The Professional Geographer,2021,73(3):573-578.
[10] 王少华,梁留科. 旅游产业集聚背景下遗产区土地格局演变及机理——以龙门石窟为例[J]. 经济地理,2015,35(12):216-224.
[11] 常疆,刘新华. 休闲观光农业与土地利用的互动关系——以湖南省益阳市为例[J]. 经济地理,2007,27(6):1011-1014.
[12] 范强,杨俊,吴楠,等. 海岸旅游小镇景观格局演变与动态模拟——以大连市金石滩国家旅游度假区为例[J]. 地理科学,2013,33(12):1467-1475.
[13] 阳柏苏,何平,赵同谦. 张家界国家森林公园土地利用格局变化[J]. 生态学报,2006(6):2027-2034.
[14] 马晓龙,金远亮. 城市土地利用变化与旅游发展的作用机制研究[J]. 旅游学刊,2014,29(4):87-96.
[15] 左冰. 土地利用变化的旅游驱动力研究[J]. 云南财贸学院学报,2005(5):106-110.
[16] Darnay S.Quality of Landscape and Sustainability Benefit to Wine Tourism:Contexts and Commitments[C]//Peris-Ortiz M,Del Río Rama M,Rueda-Armengot C(Eds). Wine and Tourism. Cham:Springer,2016.
[17] Çiğdem K A,Tülay C T,Ferah Ö,et al.Land use suitability analysis of rural tourism activities:Yenice,Turkey[J]. Tourism Management,2020,76:103949.
[18] 陈志钢. 风景名胜城市土地利用动态变化及与旅游发展的互动机理研究——以广西壮族自治区阳朔县为例[J]. 资源科学,2010,32(10):1980-1986.
[19] 邓贵平,覃建雄,颜磊. 旅游发展对九寨沟自然保护区景观格局变化的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(5):579-584.
[20] 周年兴,黄震方,林振山. 武陵源世界自然遗产旅游地景观格局变化[J]. 地理研究,2008(4):734-744.
[21] Zeng Y,Zhong L.Identifying conflicts tendency between nature-based tourism development and ecological protection in China[J]. Ecological Indicators,2020,109:105791.
[22] Soto M T R,Clavé S A. Second homes and urban landscape patterns in Mediterranean coastal tourism destinations[J]. Land Use Policy,2017,68:117-132.
[23] Montis A D,Martín B,Ortega E,et al.Landscape fragmentation in Mediterranean Europe:A comparative approach[J]. Land Use Policy,2017,64:83-94.
[24] Romano B,Zullo F.Valutazione della pressione insediativa:Indicatori esperimentazione disoglie[C]//Battisti C,Conigliaro M,Poeta G(Eds.). Biodiversità,Disturbi,Minacce. Udine:Editrice Universitaria Udinese,2013.
[25] Battisti C,Romano B.Frammentazione e connettività[C]//Dall'Analisi Ecologica Alla Pianificazione Ambientale. Torino:CittàStudi,2007.
[26] Soille P,Vogt P.Morphological segmentation of binary patterns[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters,2009,30(4):456-459.
[27] Ostapowicz K,Vogt P,Riitters K H,et al.Impact of scale on morphological spatial pattern of forest[J]. Landscape Ecology,2008,23(9):1107-1117.
[28] Vogt P,Ferrari J R,Lookingbil T R,et al.Mapping functional connectivity[J]. Ecological Indicators,2009,9(1):64-71.
[29] 邱瑶,常青,王静. 基于MSPA的城市绿色基础设施网络规划——以深圳市为例[J]. 中国园林,2013,29(5):104-108.
[30] 许峰,尹海伟,孔繁花,等. 基于MSPA与最小路径方法的巴中西部新城生态网络构建[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(19):6425-6434.
[31] 史芳宁,刘世梁,安毅,等. 城市化背景下景观破碎化及连接度动态变化研究——以昆明市为例[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(10):3303-3314.
[32] Pascual-Hortal L,Saura S.Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices:towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation[J]. Landscape Ecology,2006,21(7):959-967.
[33] Saura S,Pascual-Hortal L.A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning:comparison with existing indices and application to a case study[J]. Landscape Urban Planning,2007,83(2):91-103.
[34] 李正欢. 世界遗产地财政资源配置与旅游业的关系研究[M]. 北京:北京交通大学出版社,2017.
文章导航

/