遗产重生是强化遗产价值认知、促进遗产保护与传承、增强和提升文化自信的重要课题,空间生产理论在审视社会空间形态与文化生产演化方面具有重要作用,为分析遗产重生的过程与机制提供了解读视角。大运河作为一类巨型的线性文化遗产,难以全景分析遗产格局状态和演化机制,针对其中节点开展空间生产演化研究,是揭示遗产重生过程与机制的基础性工作。以扬州运河三湾生态文化公园为例,运用土地利用变化指数模型和GIS技术,从空间形态层面刻画遗产重生的物理形变过程与特点,进一步通过查阅志书和访谈分析探究遗产文化生产变迁历程,从空间生产视角揭示遗产重生机制。结果表明：①遗产重生过程分为农居空间、工业空间以及生态文化空间三个阶段,每一阶段功能区布局和空间形态规律不一。②遗产空间形态的变化,反映了遗产地不同阶段文化脉络及空间生产方式与内容的差异化特征,空间嬗变具有不同属性的特征。③遗产空间在工业化阶段出现断层,而在生态文明建设指引下,空间生产的三元主体共同作用,推动了运河遗产重生。
The rebirth of heritage is an important topic for strengthening the perception of heritage value,promoting the protection and inheritance of heritage,and enhancing cultural self-confidence. Spatial production theory plays an important role in examining the social spatial form and the evolution of cultural production. This theory provides an interpretation perspective to analyze the process of heritage rebirth and its mechanism. As a huge and line-like cultural heritage,it is difficult to analyze the status and evolution mechanism of the Grand Canal. To carry out research on the evolution of space production at the nodes is the basic work to reveal the process and mechanism of heritage rebirth. Taking the Sanwan Ecological and Cultural Park in Yangzhou as an example,the paper uses the land use change index model and GIS technology to describe the physical deformation process and characteristics of the heritage rebirth from the spatial morphological level,further explores the cultural production changes of the heritage through the analysis of historical records and interviews,and reveals the rebirth mechanism of heritage from the perspective of space production. The results show that: 1) The heritage rebirth process is divided into three stages: rural residential space,industrial space,and ecological and cultural space. The layout of functional areas and spatial patterns in each stage are different. 2) The change in the spatial pattern of the heritage reflects the cultural context at different stages and the differentiation characteristics of spatial production mode and content,spatial evolution has characteristics of different attributes. 3) The heritage space was interrupted in the industrialization stage. Under the guidance of the construction of ecological civilization,the ternary subjects of space production collectively promote the rebirth of the canal heritage.
[1] 过国忠. 古运河要重生,该如何发力[N]. 科技日报,2020-11-18.
[2] 康琦,赵鸣. 工业遗产地的景观再生[J]. 工业建筑,2016,46(7):93-96,101.
[3] Xie P F.Developing industrial heritage tourism:A case study of the proposed jeep museum in Toledo,Ohio[J]. Tourism Management,2006,27(6):1321-1330.
[4] 丁小珊. 三线工业遗产文化记忆的再生路径研究[J]. 社会科学研究,2021(3):198-206.
[5] 曾锐,李早. 城市工业遗产转型再生机制探析——以上海市为例[J]. 城市发展研究,2019,26(5):33-39.
[6] 陈平. 文化遗产的再生与利用[J]. 中外文化交流,2021(4):63-67.
[7] Tunbridge J E,Ashworth G J.Dissonant heritage:The management of the past as a resource in con?ict[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons,1996.
[8] 罗钢,刘象愚. 文化研究读本[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000.
[9] 厉新建. 文化旅游、旅游凝视及其他[J]. 旅游学刊,2013,28(11):8-10.
[10] 唐宁,潘天波. 江苏大运河文化记忆场所的建设及其活化传承[J]. 南京社会科学,2020(2):150-156.
[11] Moore Kevin,Buchmann Annæ,Månsson Maria,et al.Authenticity in tourism theory and experience. Practically indispensable and theoretically mischievous?[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,2021,89(2):103208.
[12] 范春. 古镇多元文化空间生产的冲突与调适——以C市H区L古镇为例[J]. 中南民族大学学报:人文社会科学版,2020,40(5):89-95.
[13] 郭文. 社区型文化遗产地的旅游空间生产与形态转向——基于惠山古镇案例的分析[J]. 四川师范大学学报:社会科学版,2019,46(2):75-82.
[14] Cai J,Peng J.Introduction of Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal and analysis of its heritage values[J]. Journal of Hydro-environment Research,2019,26:2-7.
[15] 李飞. 线性文化遗产空间结构演化研究——兼述旅游于其中的影响[J]. 地理与地理信息科学,2019,35(5):133-140.
[16] 万安伦,刘浩冰. 国家视野中大运河的历史形象变迁与出版文献探析[J]. 扬州大学学报:人文社会科学版,2019,23(5):73-80.
[17] 汪原. 关于《空间的生产》和空间认识范式转换[J]. 新建筑,2002(2):59-61.
[18] 明庆忠,段超. 基于空间生产理论的古镇旅游景观空间重构[J]. 云南师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2014,46(1):42-48.
[19] 李麦产,王凌宇. 论线性文化遗产的价值及活化保护与利用——以中国大运河为例[J]. 中华文化论坛,2016(7):75-82.
[20] Francis Farrelly,Florian Kock,Alexander Josiassen.Cultural heritage authenticity:A producer view[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,2019,79:102770.
[21] 颜敏,赵媛. 国内外运河遗产旅游研究综述[J]. 资源开发与市场,2016,32(5):626-630.
[22] 朱晗,赵荣,郗桐笛. 基于文化线路视野的大运河线性文化遗产保护研究——以安徽段隋唐大运河为例[J]. 人文地理,2013,28(3):70-73,19.
[23] Martorell Carreño A.The transmision of the spirit of the place in the living cultural routes:the Route of Santiago de Compostela as case study[C]//16th ICOMOS General Assembly and International Symposium:“Finding the spirit of place between the tangible and the intangible”. Quebec,2008.
[24] 汪芳,吕舟,张兵,等. 迁移中的记忆与乡愁:城乡记忆的演变机制和空间逻辑[J]. 地理研究,2017,36(1):3-25.
[25] 刘朝晖. “被再造的”中国大运河:遗产话语背景下的地方历史、文化符号与国家权力[J]. 文化遗产,2016(6):60-68.
[26] 孙全胜. 论马克思“空间生产”的理论形态[J]. 上海师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2020,49(3):36-46.
[27] 庄友刚. 西方空间生产理论研究的逻辑、问题与趋势[J]. 马克思主义与现实,2011(6):116-122.
[28] 马学广. 城中村空间的社会生产与治理机制研究——以广州市海珠区为例[J]. 城市发展研究,2010,17(2):126-133.
[29] Michaele Leafy.The production of space through a shrine and vendetta in Manchester:Lefebvre's spatial triad and the regeneration of a place renamed Castlefield[J]. Planning Theory and Practice,2009,10(2):189-212.
[30] 包亚明. 现代性与空间的生产[M]. 上海:上海教育出版社,2003.
[31] Lefebvre H.The Production of Space[M]. Oxford Ok and Cambridge USA:Blackwell,1991.
[32] 大卫·哈维. 列菲弗尔与《空间的生产》[J]. 黄晓武,译. 国外理论动态,2006(1):53-56.
[33] 亨利·列斐伏尔. 空间与政治[M]. 李春,译. 上海:上海人民出版社,2008.
[34] 孙九霞,许泳霞,王学基. 旅游背景下传统仪式空间生产的三元互动实践[J]. 地理学报,2020,75(8):1742-1756.
[35] 戴维·哈维. 后现代的状况[M]. 阎嘉,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[36] Harvey D.The Urbanization of Capital:Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization[M]. Oxford:Basil Blackwell,1985.
[37] 龙启蒙,傅鸿源,廖艳. 城乡一体化的资本困境与突破路径——基于西方马克思主义资本三循环理论的思考[J]. 中国农村经济,2016(9):2-15.
[38] 王有正,张京祥. 资本的城市化:基于资本三级循环理论的改革开放后我国城市发展初探[J]. 现代城市研究,2018(6):99-105.
[39] 黄剑锋,陆林. 空间生产视角下的旅游地空间研究范式转型——基于空间涌现性的空间研究新范式[J]. 地理科学,2015,35(1):47-55.
[40] 王少华,梁留科. 旅游产业集聚背景下遗产区土地格局演变及机理——以龙门石窟为例[J]. 经济地理,2015,35(12):216-224.
[41] 李维维,陈田,马晓龙. 城市旅游综合体土地利用空间格局演变及驱动机制——以西安曲江为例[J]. 地理研究,2019,38(5):1103-1118.
[42] Yi X,Fu X,Yu L,et al.Authenticity and loyalty at heritage sites:The moderation effect of postmodern authenticity[J]. Tourism Management,2018,67(8):411-424.
[43] 晏晨. 真实的地方:对现代城市遗产旅游的探讨[J]. 宁夏社会科学,2020(6):209-216.
[44] 孙九霞,张士琴. 民族旅游社区的社会空间生产研究——以海南三亚回族旅游社区为例[J]. 民族研究,2015(2):68-77,125.
[45] Park Eunkyung,Choi Byoung-Kil,Lee Timothy J.The role and dimensions of authenticity in heritage tourism[J]. Tourism Management,2019,74(2):99-109.
[46] 丁凡,屈张. 以历史文化遗产保护为特征的城市更新探析——以新加坡河的再生为例[J]. 建筑与文化,2021(1):181-182.
[47] 周宪. 文化表征与文化研究[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社,2015.
[48] 郭文,朱竑. 旅游空间生产的叠写与认同[J]. 旅游学刊,2020,35(11):1-3.
[49] 张佳. 大卫·哈维的空间正义思想探析[J]. 北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2015,52(1):82-89.
[50] Xu S,Liu Y,Qian Y,et al.The significance of the West Lake pattern and its heuristic implications for creating China's heritage tourism economics[J]. Tourism Management,2017,58(2):286-292.
[51] 胡大平. 旅游空间的正义之维[J]. 旅游学刊,2017,32(3):4-5.
[52] 孔润年. 文化建设的伦理审视[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,2015.
[53] Zhang R,Smith L.Bonding and dissonance:Rethinking the interrelations among stakeholders in heritage tourism[J]. Tourism Management,2019,74(3):212-223.
[54] Khalid S.Al-hagla. Sustainable urban development in historical areas using the tourist trail approach:A case study of the Cultural Heritage and Urban Development (CHUD) project in Saida,Lebanon[J]. Cities,2010,27(4):234-248.
[55] Su Rui,Bill Bramwell,Peter A Whalley.Cultural political economy and urban heritage tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,2018,68(1):30-40.
