EN中文

经济地理 >

2022 , Vol. 42 >Issue 5: 175 - 184

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.05.018

三农、土地与生态

社会—生态视角下县域乡村地域系统脆弱性评价与差异化应对策略

展开
  • 1.中南大学 建筑与艺术学院,中国湖南 长沙 410083;
    2.中南林业科技大学 风景园林学院,中国湖南 长沙 410004;
    3.中南林业科技大学 旅游学院,中国湖南 长沙 410004
李振民（1988—）,男,湖南长沙人,博士研究生,讲师,研究方向为区域与城乡可持续发展。E-mail：lizhenmin_cs@163.com

网络出版日期: 2023-10-07

基金资助

湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会课题（XSP22YBC202）; 湖南省教育厅科学研究青年项目（21B0240）; 湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目（19YBA380）; 湖南省教育厅科学研究项目（18C0289）

收起

Vulnerability Assessment and Differentiated Response Strategies of Rural Territorial Systems at the County Level from the Socio-ecological Perspective

Expand
  • 1. School of Architecture and Art,Central South University,Changsha 410083,Hunan,China;
    2. College of Landscape Architecture,Central South University of Forestry and Technology,Changsha 410004,Hunan,China;
    3. College of Tourism,Central South University of Forestry and Technology,Changsha 410004,Hunan,China

Online published: 2023-10-07

Fold

摘要

从社会—生态视角对乡村地域系统脆弱性进行评价,有助于厘清阻碍转型期中国乡村发展的影响因素,精准践行乡村振兴战略,促进乡村科学有序发展。文章以湖南武陵山片区为研究对象,利用VSD分析框架,从社会—生态视角提出了一套县域多维度乡村地域系统脆弱性评价指标体系,使用CRITIC法减少评价指标间的冲突性,并通过SERV模型对区域脆弱性进行测度。结果表明,研究区2019年脆弱性空间分异特征显著,差异较明显,总体呈现东南、西北高,北部、西部低的空间格局。运用定性和定量结合的方法,将高脆弱区分为4个类型,依据“和谐共生、因地制宜、循序渐进、重点突出”的原则提出了差异化的应对策略,以期实现区域的可持续发展。

关键词： 脆弱性; 乡村地域系统; 社会—生态理论; 差异化应对策略; 湖南武陵山片区; 乡村振兴

本文引用格式

李振民, 石磊, 张冲昊 . 社会—生态视角下县域乡村地域系统脆弱性评价与差异化应对策略[J]. 经济地理, 2022 , 42(5) : 175 -184 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.05.018

Abstract

This paper evaluates the vuln1erability of rural territorial systems from the socio-ecological perspective,which contributes to clarifying the influencing factors that constrain the development of Chinese rural areas during the transition period and precisely implementing the rural revitalization strategy,and promotes the scientific and orderly development of rural areas. Based on the VSD analysis framework,this paper proposes the evaluation index system of multidimensional rural territorial system vulnerability in mountainous counties from the socio-ecological perspective,uses the CRITIC method to reduce the conflict among evaluation indexes,and measures the regional vulnerability through the SERV model. The results show that it shows the significant spatial differentiation characteristics of vulnerability in the study area in 2019,which is higher in the southeast and northwest than in the north and west. This paper also uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to classify the high vulnerability areas into four types,and proposes differentiated response strategies based on the principles of "harmonious coexistence,local adaptation,gradual progress and focus" in order to achieve sustainable development of the region.

Key words： vulnerability; rural territorial systems; socio-ecological theory; differentiated response strategies; Wuling Mountain area of Hunan Province; rural revitalization

参考文献

[1] Liu Yansui,Li Yuheng.Revitalize the world's countryside[J]. Nature,2017,548:275-277
[2] World Economic Forum. The global risks report 2020[EB/OL].http://reports.weforum.org/global-risks-report-2020/,2020 - 01 - 15.
[3] 杨忍,潘瑜鑫. 中国县域乡村脆弱性空间特征与形成机制及对策[J]. 地理学报,2021,76(6):1438-1454.
[4] 王群,银马华,杨兴柱,等. 大别山贫困区旅游地社会—生态系统脆弱性时空演变与影响机理[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(8):1663-1679.
[5] Kasperson J X,Kasperson R E.International Workshop on Vulnerability and Global Environmental Change[R]. Stockholm:Stockholm Environment Institute,2001.
[6] 杨忍,陈燕纯,张菁,等. 20世纪90年代以来西方乡村地理研究的主要理论演变与启示[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(4):544-555.
[7] 刘彦随. 现代人地关系与人地系统科学[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(8):1221-1234.
[8] 吴传钧. 论地理学的研究核心——人地关系地域系统[J]. 经济地理,1991,11(3):1-6.
[9] 熊昌盛,胡宇瑶,周天肖,等. 我国省域基础设施投入对社会—生态系统脆弱性的影响[J/OL]. 应用生态学报:1 - 11[2022 - 02 - 01].DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202205.021.
[10] Sofie Skjeflo.Measuring household vulnerability to climate change:Why markets matter[J]. Global Environmental Change,2013,23(6):1694-1701.
[11] 林金煌,胡国建,祁新华,等. 闽三角城市群生态环境脆弱性及其驱动力[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(12):4155-4166.
[12] 黄静,崔胜辉,李方一,等. 厦门市土地利用变化下的生态敏感性[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(24):7441-7449.
[13] 谢盼,王仰麟,刘焱序,等. 基于社会脆弱性的中国高温灾害人群健康风险评价[J]. 地理学报,2015,70(7):1041-1051.
[14] 孙才志,曹强,王泽宇. 环渤海地区海洋经济系统脆弱性评价[J]. 经济地理,2019,39(5):37-46.
[15] Maikhuri R K,Nautiyal A,Jha N K,et al.Socio-ecological vulnerability:Assessment and coping strategy to environmental disaster in Kedarnath valley,Uttarakhand,Indian Himalayan Region[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,2017,25:111-124.
[16] 王岩,方创琳. 大庆市城市脆弱性综合评价与动态演变研究[J]. 地理科学,2014,34(5):547-555.
[17] 陈嘉雷,陈文杰,黄国如. 基于情景模拟与多源数据的城市内涝风险评估[J]. 水电能源科学,2021,39(6):55-59.
[18] 彭飞,韩增林,杨俊,等. 基于BP神经网络的中国沿海地区海洋经济系统脆弱性时空分异研究[J]. 资源科学,2015,37(12):2441-2450.
[19] 任国平,刘黎明,李洪庆,等. 基于改进熵权DEA-TOPSIS模型的乡村国土综合整治格局优化[J]. 地球信息科学学报,2022,24(2):280-298.
[20] 余中元,李波,张新时. 湖泊流域社会生态系统脆弱性分析——以滇池为例[J]. 经济地理,2014,34(8):143-150.
[21] 苗长虹,胡志强,耿凤娟,等. 中国资源型城市经济演化特征与影响因素——路径依赖、脆弱性和路径创造的作用[J]. 地理研究,2018,37(7):1268-1281.
[22] 燕玲玲,高秉丽,徐彩仙,等. 半干旱黄土丘陵区县域社会生态系统脆弱性时空变化及其影响因素——以定西市安定区为例[J]. 水土保持研究,2020,27(5):373-380,388.
[23] 王群,银马华,杨兴柱,等. 大别山贫困区旅游地社会—生态系统脆弱性时空演变与影响机理[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(8):1663-1679.
[24] 鲁大铭,石育中,李文龙,等. 西北地区县域脆弱性时空格局演变[J]. 地理科学进展,2017,36(4):404-415.
[25] 任国平,刘黎明,李洪庆,等. 都市水源区村域社会—生态系统脆弱性空间分异的地理影响模式——以上海市青浦区为例[J]. 地理科学,2021,41(8):1469-1478.
[26] 吴吉林,刘帅,刘水良,等. 张家界农户乡村旅游脆弱性评价与影响因素[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(8):1336-1344.
[27] 李平星,樊杰. 基于VSD模型的区域生态系统脆弱性评价——以广西西江经济带为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2014,29(5):779-788.
[28] Lilibeth Acosta-Michlik,Victoria Espaldon.Assessing vulnerability of selected farming communities in the Philippines based on a behavioural model of agent's adaptation to global environmental change[J]. Global Environmental Change,2008,18(4):554-563.
[29] 黄曦涛,李怀恩,张瑜,等. 基于PSR和AHP方法的西安市城市内涝脆弱性评价体系构建与脆弱度评估[J]. 自然灾害学报,2019,28(6):167-175.
[30] 陈萍,陈晓玲. 全球环境变化下人—环境耦合系统的脆弱性研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展,2010,29(4):454-462.
[31] 黄晓军,黄馨,崔彩兰,等. 社会脆弱性概念、分析框架与评价方法[J]. 地理科学进展,2014,33(11):1512-1525.
[32] IPCC. Climate change:Impacts,Adaptation and Vulnerability[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001.
[33] Turner II B L,Kasperson R E,Matson P A,et al. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2003,100(14):8074-8079.
[34] Reduction I.Living with Risk:A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives[M]. BioMed Central Ltd.,2004.
[35] Adger W N.Vulnerability[J]. Global Environmental Change,2006,16(3):268-281.
[36] 田亚平,向清成,王鹏. 区域人地耦合系统脆弱性及其评价指标体系[J]. 地理研究,2013,32(1):55-63.
[37] 黄建毅,刘毅,马丽,等. 国外脆弱性理论模型与评估框架研究评述[J]. 地域研究与开发,2012,31(5):1-5,15.
[38] 李文龙,匡文慧,吕君,等. 北方农牧交错区人地系统演化特征与影响机理——以内蒙古达茂旗为例[J]. 地理学报,2021,76(2):487-502.
[39] 王成,何焱洲. 重庆市乡村生产空间系统脆弱性时空分异与差异化调控[J]. 地理学报,2020,75(8):1680-1698.
[40] Long H,Li Y,Liu Y,et al.Accelerated restructuring in rural China fueled by 'increasing vs. decreasing balance' land-use policy for dealing with hollowed villages[J]. Land Use Policy,2012,29(1):11-22.
[41] Liu Y,Li J,Yang Yuan.Strategic adjustment of land use policy under the economic transformation[J]. Land Use Policy,2018,74:5-14.
[42] Pahl R E.The rural-urban continuum[J]. Sociologia Ruralis,1966,6(3):299-329.
[43] 吴希. 三种权重赋权法的比较分析[J]. 中国集体经济,2016(34):73-74.
[44] Tim G. Frazier,Courtney M. Thompson,Raymond J.Dezzani. A framework for the development of the SERV model:A Spatially Explicit Resilience-Vulnerability model[J]. Applied Geography,2014,51:158-172.
[45] 金儒成,梅再美,蔡广鹏,等. 主导因素法对利用聚类分析进行土地利用分区的校正研究——以贵州省仁怀市和罗甸县为例[J]. 安徽农业科学,2010,38(15):8115-8118,8171.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉