城市地理与新型城镇化

大城市边缘区城乡多维空间冲突特征与形成机制——以韶关市转溪村为例

展开
  • 长沙理工大学 建筑学院,中国湖南 长沙 410076
唐常春(1976—),男,湖南衡南人,博士,教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为经济地理与区域发展。E-mail:tangchangchun@163.com

收稿日期: 2021-03-18

  修回日期: 2021-11-03

  网络出版日期: 2023-09-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(41471109)

Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Urban-rural Multidimensional Spatial Conflict in Metropolitan Fringe:Take Zhuanxi Village in Shaoguan City as an Example

Expand
  • College of Architecture,Changsha University of Science & Technology,Changsha 410076,Hunan,China

Received date: 2021-03-18

  Revised date: 2021-11-03

  Online published: 2023-09-25

摘要

大城市边缘区作为城乡功能过渡与要素交汇区,经济社会持续演变,空间冲突日趋激烈,生态文明与城乡共同繁荣语境下加强空间冲突与协调研究具有重要意义。选取典型案例韶关市转溪村,主要采用2008与2018年土地利用数据、2018年问卷调研数据和环境抽样检测数据,从用地空间、经济社会与生态环境等维度,解析大城市边缘区城乡空间冲突特征及成因机制,提出城乡统筹与空间协调发展路径。研究表明:①研究区用地变化与冲突明显,城镇用地快速增长,侵占优质区位,农村用地空间明显缩减,生态位不断缩窄。2018年村域建设用地中城镇用地占比高达60.79%。②城乡经济差距与冲突显著,外来企业带动作用小,村庄经济发展滞后,城乡收入和公共服务差距大。转溪村人均收入仅为曲江区农村平均水平的50.94%,村民对公共服务满意度低。③城市工业等企业嵌入,导致不同程度的大气污染、噪声污染和水污染,61.37%的受访村民认为外来企业破坏环境或干扰生活。④城乡空间冲突是多维冲突的交织复合体,主要受城乡地域功能分工、乡村多元价值认知、空间组织与统筹治理、城乡协同发展制度供给等因素影响。⑤应基于生态文明进行功能协调,促进城乡等值发展。基于城乡统筹开展空间重构,优化三生空间治理。基于共同繁荣建立协同机制,保障乡村发展权益。

本文引用格式

唐常春, 卢幸芷, 雷钧钧, 孙为民 . 大城市边缘区城乡多维空间冲突特征与形成机制——以韶关市转溪村为例[J]. 经济地理, 2022 , 42(1) : 79 -89 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.01.010

Abstract

As the transition of urban-rural functions and the intersection of urban-rural elements,the economic and social development of metropolitan fringe is constantly evolving,and the spatial conflict is becoming increasingly fierce. It is of great significance to strengthen the research on spatial conflict and coordination in the context of ecological civilization and urban-rural common prosperity. Taking Zhuanxi Village of Shaoguan City as a typical case,this paper mainly uses the land use data in 2008 and 2018,questionnaire survey data and environmental sampling data in 2018 to analyze the characteristics and cause mechanism of urban-rural spatial conflict in urban fringe from the dimensions of land use space,economic society and ecological environment,and puts forward the path of urban-rural overall planning and spatial coordinated development. The results show that: 1) In the study area,land use changes and conflicts are obvious,the scale of urban land is growing rapidly,the high-quality location is occupied,the space of rural land is significantly reduced,and the ecological niche is shrinking continually. In 2018, urban land accounted for 60.79% of construction land in the village. 2) The economic gap and conflict between urban and rural areas are significant,the driving role of foreign enterprises is weak,the development of village economy lags behind,and the income gap and public service gap between urban and rural areas are large. The per capita income of Zhuanxi Village is only 50.94% of the disposable income of rural residents in Qujiang District,and the villagers' satisfaction with public services is low. 3) The embeddedness of urban enterprises leds to different degrees of air pollution,noise pollution and water pollution. 61.37% of the surveyed villagers thought that foreign enterprises destroyed the environment or interfered with their lives. 4) Urban-rural spatial conflict is a complex of multidimensional conflicts. The deep-seated causes mainly include the division of urban-rural regional functions,rural multi-value cognition,spatial organization and overall governance,system supply of urban-rural coordinated development and so on. 5) It should be based on the ecological civilization to coordinate the functions and promote the equal development of urban-rural areas. Based on the overall planning of urban and rural areas,it should carry out space reconstruction and optimize the governance of production-living-ecological space. Based on common prosperity,it should establish a collaborative mechanism to protect the rights and interests of rural development.

参考文献

[1] 张荣天,焦华富. 中国新型城镇化研究综述与展望[J]. 世界地理研究,2016,25(1):59-66.
[2] 周国华,彭佳捷. 空间冲突的演变特征及影响效应——以长株潭城市群为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2012,31(6):717-723.
[3] 张京祥. 城市与区域管治及其在中国的研究和应用[J]. 城市问题,2000(6):40-44.
[4] 李铭,方创琳,孙心亮. 区域管治研究的国际进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展,2007,26(7):107-120.
[5] 方创琳,刘海燕. 快速城市化进程中的区域剥夺行为与调控路径[J]. 地理学报,2007,62(8):849-860.
[6] 于伯华,吕昌河. 土地利用冲突分析:概念与方法[J]. 地理科学进展,2006,25(3):106-115.
[7] Campbell D J,Gichohi H,Mwangi A,et al.Land use conflict in Kajiado district,Kenya[J]. Land Use Policy,2000,17(4):337-348.
[8] 周德,徐建春,王莉. 环杭州湾城市群土地利用的空间冲突与复杂性[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(9):1630-1642.
[9] 付凯,王卓琳,任云英. 人地关系视角下西安大都市边缘区土地利用冲突及规划应对[J]. 现代城市研究,2019(9):60-66.
[10] Torre A,Melot R,Magsi H,et al.Identifying and measuring land-use and proximity conflicts:Methods and identification[J]. SpringerPlus,2014,3(85):1-26.
[11] 储胜金,许刚. 浙北山区土地利用与生态保护的冲突与协调机制研究:以天目山自然保护区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2004,13(1):24-29.
[12] 张诚. 公共空间冲突:特征、机理与治理[J]. 深圳大学学报:人文社会科学版,2020,37(1):129-135.
[13] 刘晨光,李二玲,覃成林. 中国城乡协调发展空间格局与演化研究[J]. 人文地理,2012,27(2):97-102.
[14] 刘彦随,乔陆印. 中国新型城镇化背景下耕地保护制度与政策创新[J]. 经济地理,2014,34(4):1-6.
[15] 龙花楼,屠爽爽. 土地利用转型与乡村振兴[J]. 中国土地科学,2018,32(7):1-6.
[16] 周子鑫,朱传耿. 我国区域空间整合研究进展与展望[J]. 地域研究与开发,2009,28(5):1-5.
[17] 李鑫,马晓冬,Khuong Manh-ha,等. 城乡融合导向下乡村发展动力机制[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(8):1926-1939.
[18] 曾鹏,任晓桐,李晋轩. 空间治理背景下乡村发展路径的转型与创新[J]. 小城镇建设,2020,38(8):5-11.
[19] 马晓冬,李鑫,胡睿,等. 基于乡村多功能评价的城市边缘区“三生”空间划分研究[J]. 地理科学进展,2019,38(9):1382-1392.
[20] 乔家君,马玉玲. 城乡界面的经济效应[J]. 经济地理,2016,36(9):1-9.
[21] Zhang X C,Pan Q,Zhao Y.Research on spatial calculating analysis model of land use change[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2004,14(3):104-110.
[22] 任斐鹏,江源,熊兴,等. 东江流域近20年土地利用变化的时空差异特征分析[J]. 资源科学,2011,33(1):143-152.
[23] 朱耿平,刘国卿,卜文俊,等. 生态位模型的基本原理及其在生物多样性保护中的应用[J]. 生物多样性,2013(1):90-98.
[24] 何玉霞. 当代中国城乡协调发展研究——以城乡分工的视角[D]. 曲阜:曲阜师范大学,2014.
[25] 樊杰. 我国主体功能区划的科学基础[J]. 地理学报,2007,62(4):339-350.
[26] 申明锐,沈建法,张京祥,等. 比较视野下中国乡村认知的再辨析:当代价值与乡村复兴[J]. 人文地理,2015,30(6):53-59.
[27] 樊杰. 地域功能—结构的空间组织途径——对国土空间规划实施主体功能区战略的讨论[J]. 地理研究,2019,38(10):2373-2387.
[28] 邹利林,刘彦随,王永生. 中国土地利用冲突研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2020,39(2):298-309.
[29] 罗兴奇,孙菲. 城乡发展一体化的保障机制及协同策略[J]. 农村经济,2016(1):20-25.
[30] 张京祥,夏天慈. 治理现代化目标下国家空间规划体系的变迁与重构[J]. 自然资源学报,2019,34(10):2040-2050.
文章导航

/