旅游经济与管理

黄河流域国家级非物质文化遗产分类分布特征与保护策略

展开
  • 1.宁夏大学 前沿交叉学院,中国宁夏 中卫 755000;
    2.南京师范大学 地理科学学院&江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,中国江苏 南京 210023;
王磊(1981—),男,博士,教授,研究方向为旅游地理、葡萄酒旅游。E-mail:duke@nxu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2022-09-13

  修回日期: 2023-02-10

  网络出版日期: 2023-07-03

基金资助

国家社会科学基金项目(20BJY202); 国家自然科学基金项目(42271257、42001155); 宁夏重点研发项目(引才专项)(2018BEB04015)

Distribution Characteristics and Protection of National Intangible Cultural Heritages in the Yellow River Basin

Expand
  • 1. School of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies,Ningxia University,Zhongwei 755000,Ningxia,China;
    2. School of Geography/Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,Jiangsu,China

Received date: 2022-09-13

  Revised date: 2023-02-10

  Online published: 2023-07-03

摘要

黄河流域非物质文化遗产是黄河文化和中华文明的重要组成部分。新时代黄河流域高质量发展对非物质文化遗产传承、利用和保护提出了新的要求和任务。文章基于价值—特征—保护(V-C-P)视角,以黄河流域国家级非物质文化遗产为研究对象,全面认识其类别结构、空间分布、文化生态等特征,深刻阐释黄河流域非物质文化遗产新时代价值,探索新时代非物质文化遗产保护的系统策略。研究发现:①黄河流域国家级非物质文化遗产数量结构、空间分布和文化生态与人们日常生活联系程度、内容专业性程度以及传习难易程度密切相关;遗产专业技艺性越强,其传习和保存越困难,遗产数量越少,空间分布越集聚,文化生态失调越突出。②当前黄河流域非物质文化遗产保护面临文化生态环境压力大、时代价值阐释不充分、系统性保护工程薄弱等主要问题,亟需探讨适宜新时代非物质文化遗产价值实现的“支撑—实施—保障”系统性策略,促进遗产保护和永续利用。

本文引用格式

王磊, 李涛, 刘志林 . 黄河流域国家级非物质文化遗产分类分布特征与保护策略[J]. 经济地理, 2023 , 43(2) : 229 -237 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.02.024

Abstract

The intangible cultural heritage is an important part of the Yellow River culture and Chinese civilization. The high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin in the new era puts forward new requirements and tasks for the inheritance,utilization and protection of intangible cultural heritage. Based on the perspective of value-characteristic-protection(v-c-p),This paper has systematically understood the category structure,spatial distribution,cultural ecology and other characteristics of national intangible cultural heritage in the Yellow River Basin,and deeply explained the value of intangible cultural heritage and innovative strategies for the protection of intangible cultural heritage in the new era. The results have shown that: 1) The quantitative structure,spatial distribution and cultural ecology of national intangible cultural heritage in the Yellow River Basin are closely related to local people's daily life,the degree of professionalism and the difficulty degree of inheritance. The stronger the professional skills of heritage,the more difficult it is to spread and preserve,the less the number of heritage,the more concentrated the spatial distribution,and the more prominent the imbalance of cultural ecology. 2) At present,the protection of intangible cultural heritage in the Yellow River Basin is facing major problems,such as great pressure on cultural ecological environment,insufficient interpretation of value in the new era and weak systematic protection project. It is urgent to explore the systematic strategy of "support-implementation-guarantee" suitable for the realization of intangible cultural heritage value in the new era,so as to promote heritage protection and sustainable utilization.

参考文献

[1] 张占仓. 黄河文化的主要特征与时代价值[EB/OL]. 河南大学黄河文明与可持续发展研究中心,http://yrcsd.henu.edu.cn/info/1063/6731.htm,2022-09-26.
[2] 习近平. 在黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展座谈会上的讲话[J]. 求是,2019(20):4-11
[3] 黄承梁. 推动黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展[J]. 红旗文稿,2022(8):15-17.
[4] 詹森杨. 河流、景观与遗产互联的黄河文化生态保护[J]. 民俗研究,2021(3):15-21.
[5] 马明飞,郑玉馨. 黄河流域非物质文化遗产传承与保护的困境与对策[J]. 中华遗产,2020 (Z1):29-32.
[6] Melis C,Chambers D.The construction of intangible cultural heritage:A Foucauldian critique[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,2021(89):103206.
[7] Melis C,Wise N,Badurina D J.Geo-political complexities of governmentality and Balkanism:Deconstructing UNESCO World Intangible Cultural Heritage discourses[J]. Political Geography,2022(95):102578.
[8] Masoud H,Mortazavi M,Farsani T N.A study on tourists' tendency towards intangible cultural heritage as an attraction (case study:Isfahan,Iran)[J]. City,Culture and Society,2019(17):54-60.
[9] Guo Y B,Cao Z,Zhu Z F.The influence of ICH-narrator/self-congruity on tourist's purchase intention of intangible cultural heritage products in a narrative context[J]. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management,2022(52):151-160.
[10] Paolis L T,Chiarello S,Gatto C,et al.Virtual reality for the enhancement of cultural tangible and intangible heritage:The case study of the Castle of Corsano[J]. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage,2022(27):e00238.
[11] 马知遥,刘智英,刘垚瑶. 中国非物质文化遗产保护理念的几个关键性问题[J]. 民俗研究,2019(6):39-46.
[12] 王德刚. 空间再造与文化传承:栖霞古镇都村“非遗”保护工程实验研究[J]. 民俗研究,2014(5):13-25.
[13] 桑子文,金元浦. 中国文化生态保护实验区保护传承理论创新[J]. 福建论坛·人文社会科学版,2018(4):64-72.
[14] 马翀炜,夏禾. 坐看云起时:“云上”开秧门与非物质文化遗产保护传承的图像化路径[J]. 西北民族研究,2021(4):155-166.
[15] 黄永林,谈国新. 中国非物质文化遗产数字化保护与开发研究[J]. 华中师范大学学报:人文社会科学版,2012,51(2):49-55.
[16] 王珂,易嘉欣,雷莺乔. 黄河流域文旅资源丰富[N]. 人民日报,2021-10-27(19).
[17] 王芳,黄远水,吴必虎. 传统技艺文化遗产旅游活化路径的模型构建研究[J]. 旅游学刊,2021,36(2):92-103.
[18] 杨利慧. 遗产旅游语境中的神话主义:以导游词底本与导游的叙事表演为中心[J]. 民俗研究,2014(1):27-37.
[19] 卢松,王立妹. 徽州非物质文化遗产分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(1):23-31.
[20] 林青. 习近平关于非物质文化遗产重要论述及其时代价值[J]. 南京理工大学学报:社会科学版,2019,32(6):20-27.
[21] 朱鹤,刘家明,桑子文,等. 民族文化资源的类型特征及成因分析:以格萨尔(果洛)文化生态保护实验区为例[J]. 地理学报,2017,72(6):1118-1132.
[22] 中华人民共和国文化和旅游部. 黄河流域非物质文化遗产保护传承弘扬工作方案(征求意见稿)[S].2019年6月.
[23] 韩顺法,徐鹏飞,马培龙. 江苏非物质文化遗产的时空分布及其影响因素[J]. 地理科学,2021,41(9):1598-1605.
[24] 李涛,陶卓民,李在军,等. 基于GIS 技术的江苏省乡村旅游景点类型与时空特征研究[J]. 经济地理,2014 ,34(11):179-184.
[25] 冯天瑜. 真切把握中华民族文化生态变迁[N]. 北京日报,2021-05-24(12).
文章导航

/