基于Martin的经济韧性理论,构建省域入境旅游经济韧性水平评价体系,运用熵权TOPSIS对其进行测度,并分析时空演变特征,采用模糊集定性比较分析对2011、2015、2019年的省域入境旅游经济韧性组态机制进行研究。结果表明：①从时序演变特征来看,省域入境旅游经济整体韧性呈现上升趋势,区域差异不断缩小;②从空间分异特征来看,省域入境旅游经济韧性整体呈由点及线到面的空间扩散式发展,抵御能力呈显著的“沿海沿边”集聚倾向,恢复能力逐渐形成“一横二纵”的中高水平集聚带,调整能力片状组团式发展特征愈发显著,更新能力则呈现明显的南高北低特征,各维度空间格局差异显著,仍存在较大的发展空间;③在组态机制上,省域入境旅游经济韧性表现为6种驱动机制（产业支撑型创新驱动、基础巩固型创新驱动、服务优化型创新驱动、突破型产业驱动、渐进型产业驱动和基础保障驱动）和3种限制机制（服务优化限制、产业创新限制和基础产业限制）,旅游产业环境逐渐成为影响入境旅游经济韧性发展的关键所在。
Based on Martin's the economic resilience theory,this paper constructs the evaluation system of China's inbound tourism economy,studies its spatial-temporal characteristics and configuration mechanism in 2011, 2015 and 2019 using the methods of TOPSIS and fsQCA. The results show that: 1) The overall resilience level of China's inbound tourism economy shows an upward trend,and the regional differences are constantly narrowing. 2) From the perspective of spatial differentiation,the resilience of China's inbound tourism economy as a whole shows the spatial diffusion development which evolves from point distribution to line distribution and cluster distribution. The resistant ability shows a significant tendency of "coastal and border" agglomeration,the recovery ability gradually forms a "one horizontal and two vertical" high-level agglomeration zones,the adjustment ability shows the development characteristics of cluster pattern,and the renewal ability shows the obvious characteristics of high in the south and low in the north. The spatial pattern of each dimension has significant difference,and there is still a large space for development. 3) As for the configuration mechanism,the economic resilience of China's inbound tourism is manifested in six types of driving mechanism (industry supporting innovation-driven type,foundation consolidation innovation-driven type,service optimization innovation-driven type,breakthrough industry-driven type,gradual industry-driven type and foundation security-driven type) and three types of restrictive mechanism (service optimization-restrict type,industrial innovation-restrict type and foundation industry-restrict type). The environment of tourism industry has gradually become the key to the resilient development of inbound tourism economy.
[1] 文艳,孙根年. 中国入境旅游贸易效率及其影响因素研究——基于异质性随机前沿引力模型的估计[J]. 旅游学刊,2021,36(3):29-43.
[2] 王钊,李涛. 中国入境旅游流集散优势度与旅游经济效率的时空耦合分析[J]. 人文地理,2021,36(5):157-166.
[3] Dwyer L,Forsyth P.Assessing the benefits and costs of inbound tourism[J].Annals of Tourism Research,1993,20(4):751-768.
[4] Yi-Bin Chiu,Wenwen Zhang,Kaixin Ding.Does globalization influence inbound tourism?Evidence from a dynamic panel threshold analysis[J].Journal of Travel Research,2021,60(5):1074-1084.
[5] 徐雨利,龙花楼,屠爽爽,等. “一带一路”倡议对我国沿线重点省份入境旅游效率的影响[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(9):201-210.
[6] 刘军胜,马耀峰. 中国主要旅游城市与入境客源国匹配度及演化格局[J]. 经济地理,2021,41(4):158-165.
[7] 张子昂,黄震方,曹芳东,等. 浙江省县域入境旅游时空跃迁特征及驱动机制[J]. 地理研究,2016,35(6):1177-1192.
[8] 阮文奇,郑向敏,李勇泉,等. 中国入境旅游的“胡焕庸线”空间分布特征及驱动机理研究[J]. 经济地理,2018,38(3):181-189,199.
[9] 何俊阳,贺灵,邓淇中. 泛珠三角区域入境旅游发展效率评价及影响因素[J]. 经济地理,2016,36(2):195-201.
[10] 罗浩,张瑜璇. 中国的入境旅游客源市场收敛吗?[J]. 旅游学刊,2018,33(7):28-39.
[11] 姬宸宇,张含宇. 旅游业、民航业和经济增长之间的动态关系——基于中国主要旅游城市的面板数据分析[J]. 旅游学刊,2021,36(12):40-53.
[12] 曹翔,张双龙,余升国. 入境旅游免签政策的游客吸引效应及其异质性[J]. 人文地理,2021,36(4):177-184.
[13] 吴良平,胡健敏,张健. 中国省域入境旅游发展的空间计量建模与影响因素效应研究[J]. 旅游学刊,2020,35(3):14-27.
[14] 杨洋,陈艳,熊洛奕,等. 综合国家距离对中国入境旅游的影响——基于CAGE距离框架的实证研究[J]. 旅游学刊,2022,37(2):62-74.
[15] 唐弘久,保继刚. 我国主要入境客源地游客的时空特征及影响因素[J]. 经济地理,2018,38(9):222-230,239.
[16] 王克军. 主要客源国对中国入境旅游市场的贡献分析[J]. 旅游学刊,2017,32(1):32-41.
[17] Mou N X,Yuan R Z,Yang T F,et al.Exploring spatio-temporal changes of city inbound tourism flow:The case of Shanghai,China[J].Tourism Management,2020,doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.103955.
[18] Beirman,David.Thailand's approach to destination resilience:An historical perspective of tourism resilience from 2002 to 2018[J]. Tourism Review International,2018,22(3-4):277-292.
[19] 吴良平,张健. 危机事件下中国入境旅游的受损格局与影响机制研究[J]. 旅游科学,2016,30(5):37-51.
[20] 阮文奇,李勇泉. 自然灾害型危机事件对客源地旅游需求的影响及空间差异——九寨沟地震后的时空异质性分析[J]. 经济地理,2018,38(8):214-223.
[21] Tien Duc Pham,Larry Dwyer,Jen-Je Su,et al.COVID-19 impacts of inbound tourism on Australian economy[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,2021,doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103179.
[22] Holling C S.Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1973,4(1):1-23.
[23] 修春亮,魏冶,王绮. 基于“规模—密度—形态”的大连市城市韧性评估[J]. 地理学报,2018,73(12):2315-2328.
[24] Martin R,Sunley P.On the notion of regional economic resilience:Conceptualization and explanation[J]. Journal of Economic Geography,2015,15(1):1-42.
[25] 孙久文,孙翔宇. 区域经济韧性研究进展和在中国应用的探索[J]. 经济地理,2017,37(10):1-9.
[26] 李连刚,张平宇,谭俊涛,等. 韧性概念演变与区域经济韧性研究进展[J]. 人文地理,2019,34(2):1-7,151.
[27] 王倩,赵林,于伟,等. 中国旅游经济系统韧性的时空变化特征与影响因素分析[J]. 地理与地理信息科学,2020,36(6):113-118.
[28] Lee Y A,Kim Jinwon,Jang Seongsoo,et al.Tourism and economic resilience[J].Annals of Tourism Research,2021,doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.103024.
[29] Zhang PY,Huang YM,Pan SP,et al.Does resilience exist in China's tourism economy?From the perspectives of resistance and recoverability[J].Sustainability,2022,doi.org/10.3390/su141710641.
[30] 方叶林,王秋月,黄震方,等. 中国旅游经济韧性的时空演化及影响机理研究[J]. 地理科学进展,2023,42(3):417-427.
[31] 杨勇,邹永广,李媛,等. 疫情冲击下我国省域旅游经济韧性空间差异与组态影响研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学,2022,38(5):111-120.
[32] 魏敏,魏海湘,黄海玉. 疫情下旅游经济韧性与高质量发展[J]. 旅游学刊,2022,37(9):5-7.
[33] 方叶林,吴燕妮,黄震方,等. 中国大陆入境旅游产业演化与韧性研究[J]. 经济地理,2023,43(1):188-196.
[34] 董亚娟,张一荻. 中国入境旅游经济韧性、效率提升与恢复性增长[J]. 陕西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2023.51(2):1-11.
[35] 杜运周,贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界,2017(6):155-167.
[36] 刘倩倩,宋瑞,周功梅. 旅华外国客源市场的俱乐部收敛研究——识别方法与影响因素[J]. 旅游学刊,2021,36(6):88-102.
[37] 黄锐,谢朝武. 中国赴东盟地区旅游安全事故风险因子的组态影响探测——基于HEVP框架的模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 经济地理,2021,41(7):202-212.
