中国地理学,特别是中国人文与经济地理学形成了具有鲜明特色的学科发展体系。党的二十大报告提出实现中国式现代化的历史使命。立足于地理学的学科定位和发展走向,着眼于经济地理学面向社会发展的现实需求,是正确理解和建构中国经济地理学自主知识创新体系的重要前提。首先,在讨论地理学发展战略、阐释地理过程和地理格局研究重点应从模拟和预判走向调控的基础上,文章认为:我国未来国土空间体系优化调控应成为地理学前沿命题。进而重点讨论了人文与经济地理学未来发展的5个创新方向,包括综合人文地理学将成为一个新的分支学科;人文地理学科中人口地理学的回归和振兴;做大做强政治、社会、文化地理学;重大生产力布局原理研究;国土空间体系优化的辅助决策方法论。中国地理学战略研究、国际代表性杂志和美国战略的主题词的比较表明:我国同美国战略的提法基本一致;美国战略研究同现实中国际发展前沿不相同;我国具有鲜明的研究特色且与目前现实发展的国际前沿有明显的差异性,创新地理学、人文与经济地理学自主知识具有现实基础和客观需求。其次,中国式现代化建设的使命任务与人文地理学发展规律在科学内涵、建设任务、发展路径和发展目标上高度契合。在科学内涵上,中国式现代化所强调的“人与自然和谐共生”现代化科学内涵同地理学人地关系和可持续发展的科学内涵具有高度的一致性;在建设任务上,党的二十大报告“战略”与“布局”热词与地理学的学科发展前沿和重点方向高度匹配;在发展路径上,党的二十大报告提出的“全过程人民民主”“坚持系统观念”与地理学研究和决策相结合、与地理学综合性和区域性的学科特点相契合;在发展目标上,中国式现代化建设需要解决的国家需求和关键问题与地理学发展的学科前沿和自主创新的目标高度统一。最后,以区域协调发展战略为例讨论了经济地理学和经济地理学者的使命担当,包括认识区域协调发展对推进中国式现代化建设意义的重要性;促进区域协调发展的关键是创新和健全区域协调发展机制;形成完整的促进区域协调发展的战略体系;优化重大生产力布局是区域协调发展的重要抓手;优化国土空间体系的难点是如何促进我国重点生态功能区充分发展。
Chinese geography,especially Chinese human and economic geography,has formed a discipline development system with distinctive characteristics. The report of the 20th CPC National Congress proposed the historical mission of realizing Chinese modernization. Basing on the discipline orientation and development trend of geography and focusing on the practical needs of economic geography facing social development,it is an important premise to correctly understand and construct the self-dependent knowledge innovation system of Chinese economic geography. First,the optimization and regulation of China's future territorial system should become the frontier proposition of geography on the basis of discussing the development strategy of geography and explaining that the research focus of geographical process and geographical pattern should move from simulation and prediction to regulation. Then,this paper focuses on five innovative directions for the future development of human and economic geography,including comprehensive human geography as a new branch discipline,the return and revitalization of population geography in human geography,the expansion and strengthening of political,social and cultural geography,the research on the principle of major productive force distribution,and the auxiliary decision-making methodology for the optimization of territorial system. By comparing the theme words of Chinese geographical strategic research,international representative magazines and American strategic,it is shown that the formulation of Chinese strategy is basically the same with that of the United States strategy,the strategic study of the United States is different from the international development frontier. In addition,it also shows that China has its distinctive research characteristics and is significantly different from the current international development frontier and that innovation of self-dependent knowledge of geography, human and economic geography has realistic basis and objective needs. Second,the mission and task of Chinese modernization construction are highly consistent with the development law of human geography in terms of scientific connotation,construction task,development path and development goal. In terms of scientific connotation,the modern scientific connotation of "harmony between humanity and nature" emphasized by Chinese modernization is highly consistent with the scientific connotation of the man-land relationship and the sustainable development in geography. In terms of construction tasks,the hot words of "strategy" and "layout" in the report of the 20th CPC National Congress are highly matched with the frontier and key direction of the discipline development of geography. In terms of the development path,the "developing whole-process people's democracy" and "adhering to the systematic concept" proposed in the report are in line with the geography discipline characteristics of the combination of research and decision-making,comprehensiveness and regionality. In terms of development goals,the national needs and key issues that need to be addressed in Chinese modernization construction are highly unified with the frontier of geography discipline and the goal of self-dependent innovation. Finally,taking regional coordinated development strategy as an example,economic geography and economic geographers' mission are discussed. It includes that understanding regional coordinated development is of great significance in promoting the Chinese modernization,that the key to promote regional coordinated development is to innovate and improve the mechanism,that a complete strategic system for promoting regional coordinated development has been formed,that optimizing the distribution of major productive forces is the key for regional coordinated development,and that the difficulty in optimizing the territorial system is how to promote the full development of China's ecological security zones.
[1] 陈发虎,李新,吴绍洪,等. 中国地理科学学科体系浅析[J]. 地理学报,2021,76(9):2069-2073.
[2] 樊杰,赵鹏军,周尚意,等. 人文地理学学科体系与发展战略要点[J]. 地理学报,2021,76(9):2083-2093.
[3] Fan J.A century of integrated research on the human-environment system in Chinese human geography[J]. Progress in Human Geography,2022,46(4):988-1008.
[4] 陈明星,龙花楼,王成金,等. 我国人文与经济地理学发展回顾与展望:变化大背景下我国人文与经济地理学发展高层论坛综述[J]. 地理学报,2016,71(8):1456-1471.
[5] 傅伯杰. 地理学综合研究的途径与方法:格局与过程耦合[J]. 地理学报,2014,69(8):1052-1059.
[6] 傅伯杰. 地理学:从知识、科学到决策[J]. 地理学报,2017,72(11):1923-1932.
[7] 樊杰. “人地关系地域系统”是综合研究地理格局形成与演变规律的理论基石[J]. 地理学报,2018,73(4):597-607.
[8] 樊杰. 中国人文地理学70年创新发展与学术特色[J]. 中国科学:地球科学,2019,49(11):1697-1719.
[9] 石敏俊. 区域发展政策模拟[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016.
[10] 陆大道,郭来喜. 地理学的研究核心——人地关系地域系统:论吴传钧院士的地理学思想与学术贡献[J]. 地理学报,1998,53(2):97-105.
[11] 金学良. 中国人口地理学研究的回顾与展望[J]. 人文地理,1996,11(S1):112-117,122.
[12] Feng Z M,Li F Z,Yang Y Z,et al.The past,present,and future of population geography in China:Progress,challenges and opportunities[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2017,27(8):925-942.
[13] 古恒宇,沈体雁. 中国高学历人才的空间演化特征及驱动因素[J]. 地理学报,2021,76(2):326-340.
[14] 周尚意,戴俊骋. 文化地理学概念、理论的逻辑关系之分析:以“学科树”分析近年中国大陆文化地理学进展[J]. 地理学报,2014,69(10):1521-1532.
[15] 刘云刚,安宁,王丰龙. 中国政治地理学的学术谱系[J]. 地理学报,2018,73(12):2269-2281.
[16] 樊杰,赵艳楠. 面向现代化的中国区域发展格局:科学内涵与战略重点[J]. 经济地理,2021,41(1):1-9.
[17] 钱学森. 论地理科学[M]. 杭州:浙江教育出版社,1994.
[18] 吴传钧. 经济地理学——生产布局的科学[J]. 科学通报,1960(19):594-596.
[19] 吴传钧,施雅风. 中国地理学90年发展回忆录[M]. 北京:学苑出版社,1999.
[20] 樊杰. 地理学的综合性与区域发展的集成研究[J]. 地理学报,2004(S1):33-40.
[21] 樊杰. “人地关系地域系统”学术思想与经济地理学[J]. 经济地理,2008,28(2):177-183.
[22] 陆大道,樊杰. 中国至2050年区域科技发展路线图[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2009.
[23] 吴传钧. 论地理学的研究核心——人地关系地域系统[J]. 经济地理,1991,11(3):1-6.
[24] 美国国家科学院国家研究理事会. 理解正在变化的星球:地理科学的战略方向[M]. 刘毅,刘卫东,等,译. 北京:科学出版社,2011.
[25] 美国国家研究院. 重新发现地理学[M]. 黄润华,译. 北京:学苑出版社,2002.
[26] 樊杰,周侃. 以“三区三线”深化落实主体功能区战略的理论思考与路径探索[J]. 中国土地科学,2021,35(9):1-9.
[27] 樊杰. 地域功能—结构的空间组织途径——对国土空间规划实施主体功能区战略的讨论[J]. 地理研究,2019,38(10):2373-2387.
[28] 樊杰,王亚飞,梁博. 中国区域发展格局演变过程与调控[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(12):2437-2454.
[29] Long G Y.China's changing regional disparities during the reform period[J]. Economic Geography,1999,75(1):59-70.
[30] Glawe L,Wagner H.The middle-income trap:Definitions,theories and countries concerned—A literature survey[J]. Comparative Economic Studies,2016,58(4):507-538.
[31] Cai F.Is there a “Middle‐income Trap”?Theories,experiences and relevance to China[J]. China & World Economy,2012,20(1):49-61.
[32] 樊杰,赵浩,郭锐. 我国区域发展差距变化的新趋势与应对策略[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(1):1-11.
[33] 樊杰. 中国主体功能区划方案[J]. 地理学报,2015,70(2):186-201.
[34] 樊杰,周侃,盛科荣,等. 中国陆域综合功能区及其划分方案[J]. 中国科学:地球科学,2023,53,doi:10.1360/SSTe-2022-0021.
[35] 樊杰. 我国主体功能区划的科学基础[J]. 地理学报,2007(4):339-350.
[36] Fan J,Li S S,Sun Z R,et al.The functional evolution and system equilibrium of urban and rural territories[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2022,32(7):1203-1224.
[37] 樊杰,周侃,伍健雄. 中国相对贫困地区可持续发展问题典型研究与政策前瞻[J]. 中国科学院刊,2020,35(10):1249-1263.