Spatial Pattern Evolution of China’s Urbanization Quality Classification from the Perspective of Industry

  • XU Leyi ,
  • CAO Xinsheng ,
  • LIU Chengjun
Expand
  • 1. College of Economic,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310027,Zhejiang,China;
    2. College of Economic and Management,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023,Zhejiang,China

Received date: 2018-02-24

  Revised date: 2018-06-10

  Online published: 2025-04-01

Abstract

Reconstructing the urbanization quality indexes from the perspective of industry, this article uses the DEA method to measure the industrial efficiency and the entropy method to measure the industrial urbanization quality. On this basis, it also uses the trend-surface analysis and spatial auto-correlation analysis to analyze the temporal-spatial characteristics of urbanization quality and explores the impact of international trade on the quality of urbanization by the use of Spatial Durbin Model. The main conclusions are as follows: the quality of China's urbanization unevenly develops, which is showed that it is higher in the east than the west and higher in the middle than the west and north. Moreover, export, inward foreign investment and cooperation with foreign countries can effectively promote the local urbanization quality, while outward foreign investment has the opposite effect; it will have a positive effect on its geographically adjacent provinces' urbanization quality by the way of more inward foreign investments and more imports, while it will have a positive effect on the urbanization quality of other provinces at the same level of economic development through the more inward foreign investments.

Cite this article

XU Leyi , CAO Xinsheng , LIU Chengjun . Spatial Pattern Evolution of China’s Urbanization Quality Classification from the Perspective of Industry[J]. Economic geography, 2018 , 38(12) : 68 -75 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2018.12.009

References

[1] 陈炜伟.中国城镇化率升至58.52%[EB/OL]. http://ex.cssn.cn/bk/bkpd_qklm/bkpd_bkwz/201802/t20180205_3839947.shtml,2018-02-05/2018-02-20.
[2] 中国社会科学院《城镇化质量评估与提升路径研究》创新项目组.中国城镇化质量综合评价报告[J].经济研究参考,2013(31):3-32.
[3] 马震. 贸易开放对我国城镇化进程的影响与对策研究[J].价格月刊,2017(11):91-94.
[4] 王富喜,毛爱华,李赫龙,等.基于熵值法的山东省城镇化质量测度及空间差异分析[J].地理科学,2013,33(11):1323-1329.
[5] Chenery,Syqruin.Patterns of Development,1950—1970[M].NewYork:Oxford University Press,1975:22-23.
[6] H·钱纳里. 工业化和经济增长的比较研究[M]. 上海:上海三联书店,1989.
[7] 韩雪. 山东省城镇化发展与产业结构演变的互动关系研究[D]. 济南:山东大学,2013:41-46.
[8] 卢永忠,陈波翀.中国城市化快速发展的机制研究[J].经济地理,2005,25(4):506-514.
[9] Krugman.P,Elizondo.R.Trade Policy and the Third World Metropolis[J].Journal of Development Economics,1996,49(1):137-150.
[10] 郭东杰,王晓庆.经济开发与人口流动及城镇化发展研究[J].中国人口研究,2013(5):78-85.
[11] 熊湘辉,徐璋勇.中国新型城镇化水平及动力因素测度研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2018(2):44-62.
[12] 王贺封,石忆邵,尹昌应.基于DEA模型和Malmquist生产率指数的上海市开发区用地效率及其变化[J].地理研究,2014,33(9):1636-1646.
[13] H Wang,R Zuo.A comparative study of trend surface analysisand spectrum-area multifractal model to identify geochemical anomalies[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration,2015,155:84-90.
[14] 王怡睿,黄煌,石培基.中国城镇化质量时空演变研究[J].经济地理,2017,37(1):90-97.
[15] 徐维祥,张凌燕,刘程军.多维邻近下新型城镇化的时空分异特征和驱动机制——以长江经济带为实证[J].经济地理,2017,37(9):70-79.
[16] 张春梅,张小林,吴启焰,等.城镇化质量与城镇化规模的协调性研究——以江苏省为例[J].地理科学,2013,33(1):16-22.
[17] 马述忠,李嫣君,吴国杰.基于空间自相关的中国技术类创新资源流动影响因素分析[J].经济学家,2015(11):15-25.
[18] 林光平,龙志和,吴梅.中国地区经济σ-收敛的空间计量实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006(4):14-22.
[19] 张亚斌. 进出口贸易对我国城镇化发展的影响分析[D]. 广州:暨南大学,2015.
[20] 章昌裕. 对外经济合作六十年:回顾与前瞻[J].国际经济合作,2009(2):4-8.
[21] 方创琳,王德利.中国城市化发展质量的综合测度与提升路径[J]. 经济地理,2011,31(11):1932-1945.
[22] 时娇. 贸易开放对城镇化的影响:基于中东西部比较研究[D]. 南京:东南大学,2016.
[23] 杨璐璐. 中部六省城镇化质量空间格局演变及驱动因素——基于地级及以上城市的分析[J].经济地理,2015,35(1):68-75.
[24] 罗良文,梁胜荣.贸易开放、产业集聚与城镇——基于1993—2013年省级面板数据的实证研究[J].社会科学研究,2016(2):8-14.
[25] Moir H.Relationships between urbanization levels and the in-dustrial structure of the labor force[J].Economic Development and Cultural Change,1976(1):123-135.
[26] 干春晖,郑若谷,余典范.中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J].经济研究,2011(5):4-16.
[27] 王慧,卞艺杰,王数乔.出口贸易、工业碳排放效率动态演进与空间溢出[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2016(1):3-19.
Outlines

/