EN中文

Economic geography >

2024 , Vol. 44 >Issue 1: 88 - 98

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2024.01.009

Pattern and Evolution Mechanism of Well-being Level in Mountainous Counties from a Perspective of Human-living-industry Synergy：A Case Study of 27 Counties in the Dabie Mountains

Expand
  • 1. School of Geography and Tourism,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi'an 710119,Shaanxi,China;
    2. Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,Hubei,China;
    3. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,Hubei,China

Received date: 2023-06-20

  Revised date: 2023-11-17

  Online published: 2024-06-03

Fold

Abstract

Taking the 27 counties (cities,districts) in the Dabie Mountains and based on the analysis framework of well-being level from a perspective of human-living-industry synergy,this paper measures their well-being level by the means of the entropy weight TOPSIS,uses the methods of the Theil index and the GeoDetector to analyze the spatiotemporal pattern of well-being level of 27 counties (cities,districts),and analyzes the influencing factors and driving mechanism of spatiotemporal differentiation of well-being level in the research area. It's found that: 1) From 2011 to 2020,the range of well-being level value in each county is between 0.151 and 0.554. Overall,there is room for further improvement in the county's well-being level,the differences in the well-being level of each county are gradually narrowing. 2) At different time points,counties with relatively high value of well-being level mostly distribute on the northeastern side of the Dabie Mountains and spread in the peripheral areas of research area,the well-being level is stable or increasing. 3) The spatiotemporal difference characteristics of well-being level at the county scale are the result of the joint action of multiple influencing factors. The forces of strategy,subject,object,power,and feedback play differentiated roles in the well-being level at different time.

Key words： county scale; well-being; human-living-industry synergy; evaluation; old revolutionary base areas; rural revitalization; Dabie Mountains

Cite this article

ZI Minggui, ZHANG Chunyan, LUO Jing, ZHOU Yi . Pattern and Evolution Mechanism of Well-being Level in Mountainous Counties from a Perspective of Human-living-industry Synergy：A Case Study of 27 Counties in the Dabie Mountains[J]. Economic geography, 2024 , 44(1) : 88 -98 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2024.01.009

References

[1] 颜军. 对习近平关于人民美好生活重要论述的深入思考[J]. 科学社会主义,2020,31(2):56-64.
[2] 王圣云. 多维转向与福祉地理学研究框架重构[J]. 地理科学进展,2011,30(6):739-745.
[3] 占少贵,王圣云,傅春. 福祉研究文献综述[J]. 广西社会科学,2014,30(12):100-105.
[4] Diener E.Subjective well-being[J]. Psychological Bulletin,1984,95(3):542-575.
[5] Cummins R A,Hunter B,Davern M,et al.The Australian unity wellbeing index:An overview[J]. Social Indicators Network News,2003,76:1-4.
[6] 王圣云. 福祉地理学:中国区域发展不平衡研究[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社,2011.
[7] Uysal M,Sirgy M J,Woo E,et al.Quality of life (QOL) and well-being research in tourism[J]. Tourism Management,2016,53:244-261.
[8] 朱杰,卢春天,石金莲,等. 自然保护区居民福祉的历时性——以陕西佛坪国家级自然保护区为例[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(22):8299-8309.
[9] 田建国,庄贵阳,朱庄瑞. 新时代中国人类福祉的理论框架和测量[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(12):9-18.
[10] Vemuri A W,Costanza R.The role of human,social,built,and natural capital in explaining life satisfaction at the country level:Toward a National Well-Being Index[J]. Ecological Economics,2006,58(1):119-133.
[11] 粟路军,何学欢,胡东滨. 旅游者主观幸福感研究进展及启示[J]. 四川师范大学学报:社会科学版,2019,46(2):83-92.
[12] Smith L M,Case J L,Smith H M,et al.Relating ecosystem services to domains of human well-being:Foundation for a US index[J]. Ecological Indicators,2013,28:79-90.
[13] 王靓. 社区福祉指标——澳大利亚维多利亚州社区指标系统探讨[J]. 规划师,2012,28(Sup2):182-187.
[14] 付永虎,解文艳,刘俊青,等. 基于GeoSOS-FLUS模型的江苏省生态福祉时空演变及其预测研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2023,32(1):71-82.
[15] 黄志刚,黎洁. 乡村旅游征地对失地农户福祉的影响——基于PSM模型的检验[J]. 资源科学,2021,43(1):171-184.
[16] 陈明星,周园,汤青,等. 新型城镇化、居民福祉与国土空间规划应对[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(6):1273-1287.
[17] 程明洋,刘彦随,蒋宁. 黄淮海地区乡村人—地—业协调发展格局与机制[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(8):1576-1589.
[18] 李鑫,马晓冬,胡嫚莉. 乡村地域系统人—地—业要素互馈机制研究[J]. 地理研究,2022,41(7):1981-1994.
[19] 李涛. “人—地—业”协同视角下乡村旅游投资与目的地空间作用研究[J]. 地理研究,2022,41(12):3259-3272.
[20] 陶慧,张梦真,刘家明. 共生与融合:乡村遗产地“人—地—业”协同发展研究——以听松文化社区为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2022,41(4):582-594.
[21] 翟晨阳,王圣云. 基于系统动力学的鄱阳湖区多维福祉时空差异演变与情景模拟[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(8):2954-2967.
[22] 贺艳华,刘聪,周国华,等. 长江经济带城乡居民福祉测度及其差异[J]. 热带地理,2021,41(2):327-339.
[23] 李文青,赵雪雁,杜昱璇,等. 秦巴山区生态系统服务与居民福祉耦合关系的时空变化[J]. 自然资源学报,2021,36(10):2522-2540.
[24] 张圆刚,张宏梅,何杨媚,等. 文旅融合发展的社会福祉效应研究:逻辑诠释、测度与机制框架[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(5):233-240.
[25] Yoon K P,Hwang C L.Multiple Attribute Decision Making:An Introduction[M]. London:Sage Publications,1995.
[26] 赵明华,郑元文. 近10年来山东省区域经济发展差异时空演变及驱动力分析[J]. 经济地理,2013,33(1):79-85.
[27] 马雪莹,邵景安,徐新良. 基于熵权—TOPSIS的山区乡镇通达性研究——以重庆市石柱县为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2016,35(9):1144-1154.
[28] 鲍涵,滕堂伟,胡森林,等. 长三角地区城市绿色创新效率空间分异及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(2):273-284.
[29] 刘彦随,李进涛. 中国县域农村贫困化分异机制的地理探测与优化决策[J]. 地理学报,2017,72(1):161-173.
[30] 杨忍,罗秀丽,陈燕纯. 中国县域乡村地域多功能格局及影响因素识别[J]. 地理科学进展,2019,38(9):1316-1328.
[31] 金恩焘,王圣云,姜婧,等. 21世纪以来中国城乡福祉差距的时空分异与政策研究[J]. 公共行政评论,2019,12(4):143-160,193-194.
[32] 苏红键. 中国地区福祉的比较研究[J]. 社会科学战线,2020,43(10):89-98.
[33] 任婷婷,周忠学. 农业结构转型对生态系统服务与人类福祉的影响——以西安都市圈两种农业类型为例[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(7):2353-2365.
[34] 刘迪,陈海,张行,等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区生态系统服务对人类福祉的影响及其群体差异[J]. 地理研究,2022,41(5):1298-1310.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉