Based on the scientific connotation of resilience theory and the systematic characteristics of human settlement environment of traditional villages,this paper constructs the physical examination evaluation index system and the comprehensive evaluation function of human settlement environment of traditional villages from three aspects: the stability of landscape order,the diversification of regional functions and the adaptation of construction subjects. Based on the above,it evaluates four typical traditional villages in Hunan Province. The results show that: 1) The overall development of the physical examination results of human settlement environment in the four typical traditional villages is good, and the internal differences are obvious. 2) Among the three criteria layers,the evaluation results of the landscape order stability layer,which represents the basis for the continuous development of human settlement environment of traditional villages,are better,while the evaluation results of the regional function diversification layer and the construction subject adaptation layer,which represent the advantages of the traditional village human settlement environment and promote the transformation and adaptation of the system,are relatively different. 3) The systematic problems of human settlement environment in traditional villages are concentrated in two aspects: the power imbalance of multiple subjects and the lack of cultural inheritance. According to the results of physical examination and evaluation,the differential restoration path of human settlement environment of traditional villages is explored from two aspects: strengthening community empowerment and implementing cultural compensation.
LI Bohua, LONG Xiangyu, DOU Yindi, YANG Fuduan
. Physical Examination and Restoration Path of Human Settlement of Traditional Villages：A Case Study of Four Typical Traditional Villages in Hunan Province[J]. Economic geography, 2024
, 44(2)
: 175
-186
.
DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2024.02.018
[1] 孙九霞. 传统村落:理论内涵与发展路径[J]. 旅游学刊,2017,32(1):1-3.
[2] 杨馥端,窦银娣,易韵,等. 催化视角下旅游驱动型传统村落共同富裕的机制与路径研究——以湖南省板梁村为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2023,38(2):357-374.
[3] 项继权,周长友. “新三农”问题的演变与政策选择[J]. 中国农村经济,2017(10):13-25.
[4] 曹海林. 乡村社会变迁中的村落公共空间——以苏北窑村为例考察村庄秩序重构的一项经验研究[J]. 中国农村观察,2005(6):61-73.
[5] 张文忠,何炬,谌丽. 面向高质量发展的中国城市体检方法体系探讨[J]. 地理科学,2021,41(1):1-12.
[6] Michael C.Rural Settlement and Land Use[M]. Chicago:Aldine Transaction,2007.
[7] Marsden T,Sonnino R.Rural development and the regional state:Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,2008,24(4):422-431.
[8] Onuki Y.The archaeological excavations and the protection of cultural heritage in relation with the local society:Experiences in Peru[J]. Archaeologies,2007,3( 2) :99-115.
[9] Murat T.A participatory governance model for the sustainable development of Cumalikizik,a heritage site in Turkey[J]. Environment&Urbanization,2009,21(1):161-184.
[10] Miyazaki H,Nagai M,Shibasaki R.Development of time-series human settlement mapping system usinghistorical landsat archive[J].International Archives of the Photogrammetry,Remote Sensing and SpatialInformation Sciences,2016,41:1385-1388
[11] Dahms F.Settlement evolution in the arena society in the urban field[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,1998,14(2):299-320.
[12] Michael Woods.Rural Geography[M].London:Sage Publications ,2005.
[13] 陶伟,陈红叶,林杰勇. 句法视角下广州传统村落空间形态及认知研究[J]. 地理学报,2013(2):209-218.
[14] 高璟,吴必虎,赵之枫. 基于文化地理学视角的传统村落旅游活化可持续路径模型建构[J]. 地域研究与开发,2020,39(4):73-78.
[15] 杨兴柱,王群. 皖南旅游区乡村人居环境质量评价及影响分析[J]. 地理学报,2013,68(6):851-867.
[16] 王竹,钱振澜. 乡村人居环境有机更新理念与策略[J]. 西部人居环境学刊,2015,30(2):15-19.
[17] 王成,代蕊莲,陈静,等. 乡村人居环境系统韧性的演变规律及其提升路径——以国家城乡融合发展试验区重庆西部片区为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2022,37(3):645-661.
[18] 王成,李颢颖,何焱洲,等. 重庆直辖以来乡村人居环境可持续发展力及其时空分异研究[J]. 地理科学进展,2019,38(4):556-566.
[19] 李红波. 韧性理论视角下乡村聚落研究启示[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(4):556-562.
[20] Modica M,Reggiani A.Spatial economic resilience:Overview and perspectives[J]. Networks and Spatial Economics,2014,15(2):211-233.
[21] Holling C S.Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1973,4:1-23.
[22] 龙翔宇,李伯华,窦银娣,等. 有机更新视角下传统村落人居环境活化研究——以湖南4个典型传统村落为例[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2023,46(1):117-125.
[23] 邹君,刘媛,谭芳慧,等. 传统村落景观脆弱性及其定量评价——以湖南省新田县为例[J]. 地理科学,2018,38(8):1292-1300.
[24] 杨立国,龙花楼,刘沛林,等. 传统村落保护度评价体系及其实证研究——以湖南省首批中国传统村落为例[J]. 人文地理,2018,33(3):121-128,151.
[25] 徐凯,房艳刚. 辽宁省乡村多功能评价和演变特征分析[J]. 经济地理,2021,41(1):147-157.
[26] 安悦,周国华,贺艳华,等. 基于“三生”视角的乡村功能分区及调控——以长株潭地区为例[J]. 地理研究,2018,37(4):695-703.
[27] 周小平,郭一嘉,张辉,等. 城市周边乡村多功能评价及治理策略——以宁波市鄞州区和聊城市茌平区为例[J]. 城市发展研究,2021,28(11):110-117.
[28] 魏成,苗凯,黄铎,肖大威. 传统村落基础设施综合评价体系研究——以珠江三角洲为例[J]. 城市与区域规划研究,2017,9(4):112-126.
[29] 张鸿,杜凯文,靳兵艳. 乡村振兴战略下数字乡村发展就绪度评价研究[J]. 西安财经大学学报,2020,33(1):51-60.
[30] 杨忍,罗秀丽,陈燕纯. 中国县域乡村地域多功能格局及影响因素识别[J]. 地理科学进展,2019,38(9):1316-1328.
[31] 朱跃,杨兴柱,杨周,等. 主体功能视角下皖南旅游区乡村多功能演化特征与影响机制[J]. 地理科学,2021,41(5):815-823.
[32] 张挺,徐艳梅,李河新. 乡村建设成效评价和指标内在影响机理研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(11):37-46.
[33] 王淑佳,孙九霞. 中国传统村落可持续发展评价体系构建与实证[J]. 地理学报,2021,76(4):921-938.
[34] 张文忠. 中国城市体检评估的理论基础和方法[J]. 地理科学,2021,41(10):1687-1696.
