EN中文

Economic geography >

2023 , Vol. 43 >Issue 12: 23 - 35

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.12.003

Spatiotemporal Divergence of China-USA-India Geo-economic Influence Power over Pan-South Asian Countries

Expand
  • 1. Faculty of Geographical Science,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China;
    2. Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability,Xining 810008,Qinghai,China;
    3. Yunnan Provincial Seismological Bureau,Kunming 650224,Yunnan,China;
    4. Faculty of Geography,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming 655500,Yunnan,China;
    5. Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research & Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System,Environment and Resources,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China;
    6. School of Geography,Qinghai Normal University,Xining 810008,Qinghai,China

Received date: 2023-03-13

  Revised date: 2023-08-14

  Online published: 2024-03-29

Fold

Abstract

The geo-economic influence power has increasingly become an important research content for safeguarding the national security,assisting the national geo-strategic decision-making and clarifying the national geo-environment. Based on national strength,international trade,investment,aid,loans and other data and indicators,this paper constructs an analytical framework and quantitative model of geo-economic influence power from the two aspects of the influence power implementation and the influence power implementation effectiveness,and takes China,the United States,India and Pan-South Asia countries as examples to study the implementation,effectiveness and evolution of their geo-economic influence power. The findings are as follows: 1) In the aspect of influence power implementation,the sensitivities and vulnerabilities among China-the United States-India and the "Pan-South Asian" countries reveal a distinct realism,and different years have their own emphasis and choices on the influence and "construction"of Pan-South Asia countries in different years. 2) In the aspect of the influence power implementation effectiveness,the "Pan-South Asian" countries' responses and reactions to the power influenced by China,the United States and India vary,and there is a tendency of "great power balance and multi-bilateral betting" in their dependence and reliance. 3) In terms of influence power evolution,China,the United States and India have obvious differences in the construction and solidification of their respective influencing areas,the influence power change situation and patterns are complex and heterogeneous.This paper concludes with a discussion of the sources of influence power,the process of its exercise and effectiveness,and the geo-economics of its application to the world.

Key words： geo-economic influence power; influence power implementation; influence power effectiveness; spatio-temporal differentiation; China,the USA,India and Pan-South Asian countries

Cite this article

NIU Fuchang, GE Yuejing, ZHAO Zhengxian, CHEN Xiuhong, HUANG Yu, WU Junqiang . Spatiotemporal Divergence of China-USA-India Geo-economic Influence Power over Pan-South Asian Countries[J]. Economic geography, 2023 , 43(12) : 23 -35 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.12.003

References

[1] 牛福长,胡志丁,王学文. 中国和印度对周边国家的地缘经济权力时空演化[J]. 经济地理,2021,41(6):1-11.
[2] 杜德斌,段德忠,杨文龙,等. 中国经济权力空间格局演化研究——基于国家间相互依存的敏感性与脆弱性分析[J]. 地理学报,2016,71(10):1741-1751.
[3] 刘云刚,叶清露,许晓霞. 空间、权力与领域:领域的政治地理研究综述与展望[J]. 人文地理,2015,30(3):1-6.
[4] Giddens A.The Nation-state and Violence[M]. Oakland:University of California Press,1985.
[5] Taylor P J.The state as container:Territoriality in the modern world-system[J]. Progress in Human Geography,1994,18(2):151-162.
[6] Kjellén R.Staten Som lifsform[M]. Sweden:Stockholm Hugo Gebers Förlag,1916.
[7] 麦金德. 历史的地理枢纽[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1958.
[8] 阿尔弗雷德·赛耶·马汉. 海权对历史的影响[M]. 西安:陕西师范大学出版社,2010.
[9] 朱里奥·杜黑. 制空权[M]. 北京:解放军出版社,1986.
[10] Elden S.Land,terrain,territory[J]. Progress in Human Geography,2010,6(34):799-817.
[11] 胡志丁,刘玉立,李灿松,等. 权力、地缘环境与地缘位势评价——以中日钓鱼岛之争为例[J]. 热带地理,2014,34(1):50-57.
[12] Delaney D.Entering the territory of territory[C]//Delaney D.Territory:A Short Introduction. Oxford:Blackwell Publishing,2005.
[13] Storey D.Territory and territoriality[C]//Handbook on the Geographies of Regions and Territories:Edward Elgar Publishing,2018.
[14] Luttwak N E.From geopolitics to geo-economics:Logic of conflict,grammar of commerce[J]. National Interest,1990,20(3):17-23.
[15] Csurgai G.The increasing importance of geoeconomics in power rivalries in the twenty-first century[J]. Geopolitics,2018,23(1):38-46.
[16] Antto V.Geoeconomics defined and redefined[J]. Geopolitics,2017,23(1):47-49.
[17] 杨攻研,刘洪钟. 政治关系、经济权力与贸易往来:来自东亚的证据[J]. 世界经济与政治,2015(12):110-130.
[18] Wang J Z,Wang X T.The game analysis of China energy security[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials,2013,318:432-436.
[19] Twarowska K.Reforms of China's exchange rate regime and the renminbi internationalization[J]. Ekonomia Prawo-Economics and Law,2019,18(4):531-556.
[20] O Leonidivna K,O Oleksiivna M.Global trends of economic diplomacy development under globalization[J]. Marketing and Management of Innovations,2015(1):135-146.
[21] O Loughlin J.Geo-Economic competition in the Pacific rim:The political-geography of Japanese and United-States exports,1966-1988[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,1993,18(4):438-459.
[22] Sum N L.The intertwined geopolitics and geoeconomics of hopes/fears:China's triple economic bubbles and the 'One Belt One Road' imaginary[J]. Territory Politics Governance,2019,7(4):528-552.
[23] 杨文龙,杜德斌,马亚华. 经济权力视角下中美战略均势的地理透视[J]. 地理研究,2017,36(10):1901-1914.
[24] 侯璐璐,刘云刚. 政治地理学中生存空间概念的演变[J]. 地理科学进展,2019,38(5):637-647.
[25] 陈小强,袁丽华,沈石,等. 中国及其周边国家间地缘关系解析[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(8):1534-1547.
[26] Sparke M.Geoeconomics,globalisation and the limits of economic strategy in statecraft:A response to Vihma[J]. Geopolitics,2018,23(1):30-37.
[27] 王淑芳,葛岳静,刘玉立. 中美在南亚地缘影响力的时空演变及机制[J]. 地理学报,2015,70(6):864-878.
[28] 潘忠岐,黄仁伟. 中国的地缘经济战略[J]. 清华大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2008,23(5):116-122.
[29] De Graaff N,Van Apeldoorn B.US-China relations and the liberal world order:Contending elites,colliding visions?[J]. International Affairs,2018,94(1):113.
[30] Mercille J.The radical geopolitics of US foreign policy:Geopolitical and geoeconomic logics of power[J]. Political Geography,2008,27(5):570-586.
[31] 马亚华,冯春萍. 空间视角下的东亚权力分布——一种基于引力模型的比较静态分析[J]. 世界经济与政治,2014(11):121-134.
[32] 邝艳湘. 经济相互依赖、退出成本与国家间冲突升级——基于动态博弈模型的理论分析[J]. 世界经济与政治,2010(4):123-138.
[33] 马腾,葛岳静,黄宇,等. 基于流量数据的中美两国与东北亚地缘经济关系研究[J]. 地理学报,2020,75(10):2076-2091.
[34] 项卫星,王冠楠. 中美经济相互依赖关系中的敏感性和脆弱性——基于“金融恐怖平衡”视角的分析[J]. 当代亚太,2012(6):90-111.
[35] 王毛平. 中日经济“非对称性”相互依赖与权力分析[J]. 国际论坛,2010,12(1):40-45.
[36] 曹德军. 中美印不对称三角关系的“信任—权力”分析[J]. 国际展望,2015,7(5):128-145.
[37] 陈建山. 中美印“战略三角”新变化及趋势分析[J]. 学术探索,2020(2):79-88.
[38] 戴永红. 中美印在缅甸的竞合博弈及中国的应对[J]. 四川大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2015(4):146-153.
[39] 季澄,宋德星. 印太视域下的中、美、印海上地缘博弈——表象与实质[J]. 亚太安全与海洋研究,2017(5):32-47.
[40] Wigell M.Conceptualizing regional powers' geoeconomic strategies:Neo-imperialism,neo-mercantilism,hegemony,and liberal institutionalism[J]. Asia Europe Journal,2016,14(2):135-151.
[41] Moisio S,Paasi A.From geopolitical to geoeconomic? The changing political rationalities of state space[J]. Geopolitics,2013,2(18):267-283.
[42] 胡志丁,张喆,赵路平. 地缘环境研究的理念及议程与路径[J]. 地理学报,2023,78(1):198-213.
[43] 曹玮. 中美战略竞争下的战略第三方选择:基于海量事件数据的中美印、中美俄、中美欧VAR模型分析[J]. 当代亚太,2021(5):39-74.
[44] Stanojević N.Geoeconomic concept and practice:Classification of contemporary geoeconomic means[J]. The Review of International Affairs,2021(72):29-46.
[45] Moisio S. Re-thinking geoeconomics:Towards a political geography of economic geographies[J]. Geography Compass,2019,https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12466.
[46] Fjäder C.Interdependence as dependence:Economic security in the age of global interconnectedness[C]//Wigell M,Scholvin S,Aaltola M. Geo-Economics and Power Politics in the 21st Century. London:Routledge,2018.
[47] 赵亚博,葛岳静. 基于事件分析法的中国与中亚地区地缘关系演变[J]. 经济地理,2019,39(5):1-9.
[48] 马腾,李一杰,潘娴,等. 中、美、俄与中东欧国家地缘经济关系的时空演变[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(6):1-12.
[49] 刘大庆,李长军,张宏,等. 基于地缘影响力模型的大国地缘政治博弈——以钓鱼岛问题背景下的中美博弈为例[J]. 地理科学,2019,39(10):1663-1671.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉