Types and Spatial Pattern of Coupling Coordination Between the New-type Urbanization and Eco-environment in Wuling Mountainous Area of Hunan

Expand
  • 1. Business School, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha 410205, Hunan, China;
    2. Research Center for Green Poverty Alleviation and Development in Wuling Mountainous Area, Jishou University, Jishou 416000, Hunan, China

Received date: 2022-04-26

  Revised date: 2022-08-11

  Online published: 2023-11-03

Abstract

:Taking Wuling Mountainous area of Hunan as the research area,this paper analyzes the temporal and spatial differences of the coupling coordination between new-type urbanization and eco-environment from 2011 to 2020 and its influencing factors. The results show that:1) The development trend of coupling coordination between new-type urbanization and eco-environment is generally good in this region. Most counties and cities are in mild or moderate coupling coordination state. The coupling coordinated development of new-type urbanization and eco-environment in this region has been gradually upgraded. In the process of spatial evolution,it has formed a spatial pattern,which takes the central cities as the core to drive the development of surrounding areas. 2) It presents the following two development types in most of counties and cities:mild coupling coordination state and lagging urbanization,moderate coupling coordination state and lagging urbanization. In particular,the problem of lagging urbanization is very serious. 3) The factors affecting the coupling coordination can be summarized as economic factor,social factor,population factor,resource factor and environmental factor. Among them,environmental factor has the greatest impact on the coupling coordination between new-type urbanization and eco-environment,followed by economic factor,population factor and resource factor.

Cite this article

SHAO Jia, LENG Jing . Types and Spatial Pattern of Coupling Coordination Between the New-type Urbanization and Eco-environment in Wuling Mountainous Area of Hunan[J]. Economic geography, 2022 , 42(9) : 87 -95 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.09.010

References

[1] Howard E.Garden Cities of Tomorrow[M]. London:Rosemount Press,1902.
[2] Tong C.Review on environmental indicator research[J]. Research on Environmental Science,2000,13(4):53-55.
[3] Grossman Gene M,Krueger Alan B.Economic growth and the environment[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1995,110(2):353-377.
[4] OECD. Indicators to Measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressure from Economic Growth[R]. Paris:OECD,2002.
[5] Townsend A M.Life in the real-time city:Mobile telephones and urban metabolism[J]. Journal of Urban Technology,2000,7(2):85-104.
[6] Rockstrom J,Steffen W,Noone K,et al.A safe operating space for humanity[J]. Nature,2009,461(7263):472-475.
[7] Wackernagel M,Rees W.Our Ecological Footprint:Reducing Human Impact on the Earth[M]. Gabriola Island:New Society Publishers,1998.
[8] 马世骏,王如松. 社会—经济—自然复合生态系统[J]. 生态学报,1984(1):1-9.
[9] 乔标,方创琳. 城市化与生态环境协调发展的动态耦合模型及其在干旱区的应用[J]. 生态学报,2005(11):211-217.
[10] 方创琳,杨玉梅. 城市化与生态环境交互耦合系统的基本定律[J]. 干旱区地理,2006(1):1-8.
[11] 乔标,方创琳,黄金川. 干旱区城市化与生态环境交互耦合的规律性及其验证[J]. 生态学报,2006(7):2183-2190.
[12] 刘海猛,方创琳,李咏红. 城镇化与生态环境“耦合魔方”的基本概念及框架[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(8):1489-1507.
[13] 方创琳,周成虎,顾朝林,等. 特大城市群地区城镇化与生态环境交互耦合效应解析的理论框架及技术路径[J]. 地理学报,2016,71(4):531-550.
[14] Mutisya E,Yarime M.Moving towards urban sustainability in Kenya:a framework for integration of environmental,economic,social and governance dimensions[J]. Sustainability Science,2014,9(2):205-215.
[15] Tretyakova E A.Assessing sustainability of development of ecological and economic systems:A dynamic method[J]. Studies on Russian Economic Development,2014,25(4):423-430.
[16] Roland-Holst D W,Rodrigo G C,Reinert K A. North American economic integration and industrial pollution in the Great Lakes region[J]. The Annals of Regional Science,2002,36(3):483-495.
[17] 刘耀彬. 中国城市化与生态环境耦合规律与实证分析[J]. 生态经济,2007(10):122-126.
[18] 李静芝,代宇涵,赵雯,等. 城市化系统与生态系统交互耦合时空特征及协调发展预警研究——以湖南省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(7):1590-1601.
[19] Chen M X,Huang Y B,Tang Z P.The provincial pattern of the relationship between urbanization and economic development in China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2014,24(1):33-45.
[20] 王秀明,张勇,奚蓉,等. 广东省城镇化与生态环境耦合协调的空间特征及影响因素研究[J]. 中国环境管理,2019,11(3):100-106.
[21] 王长建,张小雷,杜宏茹,等. 城市化与生态环境的动态计量分析——以新疆乌鲁木齐市为例[J]. 干旱区地理,2014,37(3):609-619.
[22] 赵安周,李英俊,卫海燕,等. 西安市城市化与城市生态环境耦合协调发展研究[J]. 水土保持研究,2012,19(6):152-156.
[23] 赵建吉,刘岩,朱亚坤,等. 黄河流域新型城镇化与生态环境耦合的时空格局及影响因素[J]. 资源科学,2020,42(1):159-171.
[24] 常新锋,管鑫. 新型城镇化进程中长三角城市群生态效率的时空演变及影响因素[J]. 经济地理,2020,40(3):185-195.
[25] 崔木花. 中原城市群9市城镇化与生态环境耦合协调关系[J]. 经济地理,2015,35(7):72-78.
[26] 陈晓红,吴广斌,万鲁河. 基于BP的城市化与生态环境耦合脆弱性与协调性动态模拟研究——以黑龙江省东部煤电化基地为例[J]. 地理科学,2014,34(11):1337-1343.
[27] 高新才,杨芳. 西北地区城镇化与生态环境耦合协调度测度[J]. 城市问题,2016(12):26-33.
[28] 张雅杰,刘辉智. 长江经济带城镇化与生态环境耦合协调关系的时空分析[J]. 水土保持通报,2017,37(6):334-340.
[29] 中共中央,国务院. 国家新型城镇化规划(2014-2020年)[DB/OL]. http://www.gov.cn/gonghao/content/2014/content_2644805.htm,2014 - 03 - 16.
[30] 匡乐红,徐林荣,刘宝琛. 组合赋权法确定地质灾害危险性评价指标权重[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2006,2(6):1063-1067.
[31] 周燕华,施生旭. 民族地区城镇化与生态环境耦合协调评价研究——以福建省10个县(市)为例[J]. 林业经济,2019,41(8):95-101.
Outlines

/