The Influence of Industrial Land Transfer Structure Tendency on Carbon Emission Efficiency and Its Transmission Mechanism:Based on The Intermediary Perspective of Green Technology Innovation

Expand
  • School of Government,Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100081,China

Received date: 2022-10-24

  Revised date: 2023-06-05

  Online published: 2023-11-03

Abstract

How to optimize regional institutional environment and guide local government behavior to realize green transformation is one of the core issues concerned by environmental economic geography. Based on the panel data of 261 prefecture-level cities in China from 2010 to 2019,this study calculates the industrial carbon emission efficiency at the city level with the help of the super-efficiency SBM-DEA model. It analyzes the influence of industrial land transfer structure tendency on carbon emission efficiency and its transmission mechanism. The results show that: 1) The transfer structure of industrial land in favor of low-end technology industry has a significant negative impact on carbon emission efficiency,and the impact is more significant in central and western regions and small and medium-sized cities. 2) Green technology innovation plays a partial mediating role in the influence of industrial land transfer structure tendency on carbon emission efficiency. 3) The transmission mechanism of green technology innovation has nonlinear characteristics,that is,the industrial structure change caused by land transfer has obvious differences in the impact on carbon emission efficiency. From the perspective of optimizing local government behavior,the paper enriches the discussion on green transformation in environmental economic geography research and provides a new empirical perspective for promoting the creation of supply-side path and realizing green transformation. The policy implication of this paper is that,in order to achieve high-quality development,it is necessary to adjust the incentive of local government industrial land transfer. It is not only necessary to reasonably control the scale of local government industrial land transfer,but more importantly,to optimize the industrial land transfer structure,so as to provide support for the realization of the "double carbon" goal and regional sustainable development.

Cite this article

HUANG Zhiji, SONG Mingyue . The Influence of Industrial Land Transfer Structure Tendency on Carbon Emission Efficiency and Its Transmission Mechanism:Based on The Intermediary Perspective of Green Technology Innovation[J]. Economic geography, 2023 , 43(7) : 65 -76 . DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.07.007

References

[1] 原伟鹏,孙慧,王晶,等. 中国城市减污降碳协同的时空演化及驱动力探析[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(10):72-82.
[2] 莫惠斌,王少剑. 黄河流域县域碳排放的时空格局演变及空间效应机制[J]. 地理科学,2021,41(8):1324-1335.
[3] Wu H,Qiu Y,Yin L,et al.Effects of China’s land-intensive use on carbon emission reduction:A new perspective of industrial structure upgrading[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science,2022,10:1073565.
[4] 黄志基,朱晟君,石涛. 工业用地出让、技术关联与产业进入动态[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(5):144-155.
[5] Peng J,Zheng Y,Liu C.The impact of urban construction land use change on carbon emissions:Evidence from the China land market in 2000-2019[J]. Land,2022,11(9):1440.
[6] 陈前利,马贤磊,石晓平,等. 工业用地供应行为影响工业能源碳排放吗?——基于供应规模、方式与价格三维度分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(12):57-67.
[7] 刘璇,许恒周,张苗. 土地出让市场化的碳排放效应及传导机制——基于产业结构中介视角[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(6):12-21.
[8] Gao B,Huang Z,Zhang T,et al.Exploring the impact of industrial land price distortion on carbon emission intensity:Evidence from China[J]. Land,2022,12(1):92.
[9] 黄志基,宋澜,高菠阳,等. 工业用地出让、产业选择与城市空气质量[J]. 地理研究,2022,41(1):229-250.
[10] 贺灿飞,毛熙彦,彭建. 环境经济地理研究的理论演进与展望[J]. 经济地理,2021,41(10):70-78.
[11] 毛熙彦,贺灿飞. 环境经济地理学的研究现状与挑战[J]. 地理研究,2022,41(1):4-17.
[12] 姚鹏,李慧昭,孙久文. 工业用地价格扭曲、产业转移与产能回潮[J]. 经济学动态,2022(10):81-100.
[13] 李汝资,刘耀彬,王文刚,等. 中国城市土地财政扩张及对经济效率影响路径[J]. 地理学报,2020,75(10):2126-2145.
[14] 陶然,袁飞,曹广忠. 区域竞争、土地出让与地方财政效应:基于1999~2003年中国地级城市面板数据的分析[J]. 世界经济,2007(10):15-27.
[15] 雷潇雨,龚六堂. 基于土地出让的工业化与城镇化[J]. 管理世界,2014(9):29-41.
[16] 邓楚雄,赵浩,谢炳庚,等. 土地资源错配对中国城市工业绿色全要素生产率的影响[J]. 地理学报,2021,76(8):1865-1881.
[17] 余泳泽,宋晨晨,容开建. 土地资源错配与环境污染[J]. 财经问题研究,2018(9):43-51.
[18] 耿凤娟,苗长虹,胡志强. 黄河流域工业结构转型及其对空间集聚方式的响应[J]. 经济地理,2020,40(6):30-36.
[19] 刘满凤,刘熙,徐野,等. 资源错配、政府干预与新兴产业产能过剩[J]. 经济地理,2019,39(8):126-136.
[20] Huang J B,Liu Q,Cai X C,et al.The effect of technological factors on China's carbon intensity:New evidence from a panel threshold model[J]. Energy Policy,2018,115:32-42.
[21] Yang Y,Zhou Y N,Poon J,et al.China's carbon dioxide emission and driving factors:A spatial analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,211:640-651.
[22] 马海涛,王柯文. 城市技术创新与合作对绿色发展的影响研究——以长江经济带三大城市群为例[J]. 地理研究,2022,41(12):3287-3304.
[23] 于斌斌,苏宜梅. 土地财政如何影响土地利用效率?——基于规模与技术视角的动态空间杜宾模型检验[J]. 地理研究,2022,41(2):527-545.
[24] 徐博禹,刘霞辉. 进出口贸易对第一产业的碳排放效应研究——基于中国省级研发投入数据的门槛检验[J]. 经济问题,2022(2):27-33.
[25] 孙艺璇,程钰,张含朔. 城市工业土地集约利用对碳排放效率的影响研究——以中国15个副省级城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(8):1703-1712.
[26] Tone K.A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operation Research,2001,130(3):498-509.
[27] 王兆峰,杜瑶瑶. 基于SBM-DEA模型湖南省碳排放效率时空差异及影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学,2019,39(5):797-806.
[28] 王涛. 工业专业化、多样化集聚与碳排放[J]. 工业技术经济,2019,38(6):131-138.
[29] 孙作人,刘毅,田培培. 产业集聚、市场化程度与城市碳效率[J]. 工业技术经济,2021,40(4):46-57.
[30] 张彩江,陈佳平. 产业集聚对工业经济的增长是否存在地区与工业类型差异性?[J]. 商业研究,2016(9):8-16.
[31] 吴朝霞,许越,孙坤. 城市集聚效应对绿色技术创新的影响研究——基于中国232个地级及以上城市的空间计量分析[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(10):25-34,71.
[32] 毛文峰,陆军. 土地要素错配如何影响中国的城市创新创业质量——来自地级市城市层面的经验证据[J]. 产业经济研究,2020(3):17-29,126.
[33] 郭炳南,卜亚. 人力资本、产业结构与中国碳排放效率——基于SBM与Tobit模型的实证研究[J]. 当代经济管理,2018,40(6):13-20.
[34] 欧阳晓灵,张骏豪,杜刚. 环境规制与城市绿色技术创新:影响机制与空间效应[J]. 中国管理科学,2022(8):1-12.
[35] 张苗,陈银蓉,程道平,等. 土地利用结构和强度变化对碳排放影响分析[J]. 资源开发与市场,2018,34(5):624-628,675.
[36] 谢贞发,朱恺容,李培. 税收分成、财政激励与城市土地配置[J]. 经济研究,2019,54(10):57-73.
[37] Huang D,Chan R.On ‘land finance’ in urban China:Theory and practice[J]. Habitat International,2018,75:96-104.
[38] 宋丽颖,张安钦. 中国“压力型”财政激励的产业结构调整效应[J]. 财贸经济,2021,42(6):21-36.
[39] 丁一兵,刘威. 进口产品复杂度对产业结构高级化的影响——来自中国34个工业行业的经验研究[J]. 经济评论,2018(3):31-45.
[40] 任海军,赵景碧. 技术创新、结构调整对能源消费的影响——基于碳排放分组的PVAR实证分析[J]. 软科学,2018,32(7):30-34.
[41] 赵涛,张智,梁上坤. 数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据[J]. 管理世界,2020,36(10):65-76.
Outlines

/